颈动脉内膜剥脱术与颈动脉支架置入术治疗颅外颈动脉狭窄的临床疗效比较
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Clinical Efficacy Comparison Between Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting on Extracranial Carotid Stenosis Treatment
  • 作者:孙晓磊 ; 袁罡 ; 张雷 ; 王伟明 ; 何虎强 ; 胥雄飞 ; 王寓平 ; 曾宏 ; 何延政 ; 刘勇
  • 英文作者:SUN Xiao-lei;YUAN Gang;ZHANG Lei;WANG Wei-ming;HE Hu-qiang;XU Xiong-fei;WANG Yu-ping;ZENG Hong;HE Yan-Zheng;LIU Yong;Department of Vascular Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University;
  • 关键词:颈动脉狭窄 ; 颈动脉内膜剥脱术 ; 颈动脉支架置入术 ; 临床疗效
  • 英文关键词:Carotid artery stenosis;;Carotid endarterectomy;;Carotid artery stenting;;Clinical efficacy
  • 中文刊名:ZPWL
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics in General Surgery
  • 机构:西南医科大学附属医院血管外科;
  • 出版日期:2016-07-25
  • 出版单位:中国普外基础与临床杂志
  • 年:2016
  • 期:v.23
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZPWL201607016
  • 页数:5
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:51-1505/R
  • 分类号:67-71
摘要
目的比较颈动脉内膜剥脱术(carotid endarterectomy,CEA)与颈动脉支架置入术(carotid stenting,CAS)治疗颅外颈动脉狭窄的临床疗效,为颅外颈动脉狭窄的CEA和CAS治疗提供更丰富的临床循证医学证据。方法将40例有手术指征的颈动脉狭窄患者按治疗方法的不同分为CEA组和CAS组。2组患者均行相应手术治疗,观察、比较其临床疗效。结果 2组患者围术期并发症发生率、术后3个月2组患者的心血管并发症、脑卒中及死亡等主要终点事件发生率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);随访12个月,2组术侧颈动脉再狭窄、致残或致死性卒中发生率比较差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于具有手术指征的颅外颈动脉狭窄患者,CEA与CAS具有同样的临床疗效,且安全性均较高;但仍需要大样本多中心长期循证医学证据支持。
        Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of carotid endarterectomy(CEA) and carotid artery stenting(CAS) in the treatment of patients with carotid artery stenosis, and to provide a more abundant evidence-based medicine for the treatment of CEA and CAS in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Methods Forty patients with carotid artery stenosis were randomly divided into CEA group and CAS group based on the operative indication. Patients in CEA group were given carotid endarterectomy treatment and those in CAS group were given carotid artery stenting treatment. Then clinical efficacy of the two groups were observed and compared. Results In terms of the occurring rate of perioperative complications, cardiovascular events in 3 months after operation, and some major end events such as stroke, death and so on, the comparative difference between the two groups was of no statistical significance(P>0.05). Through the followedup visits of 12 months, the comparative difference between the two groups was also of no statistical significance(P>0.05) in terms of the occurring rate of carotid artery restenosis and disabling or fatal stroke. Conclusions For patients with severe extracranial carotid stenosis under indication of operation treatment, carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are of equivalent clinical efficacy, and both of them are of high security, although further study with largeamount and evidence-based medical data in long term from multiple centers is still in need.
引文
1 Huang JF,Meschia JF.Interventions for extracranial carotid artery stenosis:an update.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med,2016,18(5):34.
    2 Doig D,Turner EL,Dobson J,et al.Risk factors for stroke,myocardial infarction,or death following carotid endarterectomy:results from the international carotid stenting study.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2015,50(6):688-694.
    3 Dandapat S,Robinson JG.Guidelines for management of hyperlipidemia:implications for treatment of patients with stroke secondary to atherosclerotic disease.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep,2016,16(3):24.
    4 Winstein CJ,Stein J,Arena R,et al.Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery:a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/American Stroke Association.Stroke,2016,47(6):e98-e169.
    5 Mizukami H,Shimizu T,Maki F,et al.Progression of intracranial major artery stenosis is associated with baseline carotid and intracranial atherosclerosis.J Atheroscler Thromb,2015,22(2):183-190.
    6 Lavine SD,Cockroft K,Hoh B,et al.An international multi-society consensus document.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2016,37(4):E31-E34.
    7 Spence JD,Naylor AR.Endarterectomy,Stenting,or Neither for Asymptomatic Carotid-Artery Stenosis.N Engl J Med,2016,374(11):1087-1088.
    8 Huynh K.Atherosclerosis:carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy-no difference in long-term outcomes.Nat Rev Cardiol,2014,11(12):685.
    9 Boutchakova M,Papanagiotou P.Endovascular treatment of acute extracranial carotid artery occlusion.Radiologe,2016,56(1):18-23.
    10 Featherstone RL,Dobson J,Ederle J,et al.Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis(International Carotid Stenting Study):a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.Health Technol Assess,2016,20(20):1-94.
    11 Szikra P,Boda K,Rarosi F,et al.Aortic arch and common carotid artery plaques with soft components pose a substantial risk of cerebral embolization during carotid stenting.Interv Neuroradiol,2016,pii:1591019916633242.[Epub ahead of print].
    12 Chatzikonstantinou A,Ebert AD,Schoenberg SO,et al.Atherosclerosis in intracranial,extracranial,and coronary arteries with aortic plaques in patients with ischemic stroke of undetermined etiology.Int J Neurosci,2015,125(9):663-670.
    13 Mayor S.Carotid artery stenting is as effective as carotid endarterectomy,study shows.BMJ,2016,352:i1068.
    14 Spence JD,Naylor AR.Endarterectomy,stenting,or neither for asymptomatic carotid-artery stenosis.N Engl J Med,2016,374(11):1087-1088.
    15 Fantozzi C,Taurino M,Rizzo L,et al.Carotid endarterectomy or stenting in octogenarians in a monocentric experience.Ann Vasc Surg,2016,33:132-137.
    16 Howard G,Roubin GS,Jansen O,et al.Association between age and risk of stroke or death fromcarotid endarterectomyandcarotidstenting:a meta-analysis of pooled patient data from four randomised trials.Lancet,2016,387(10025):1305-1311.
    17 Ziaja D,Biolik G,Koce?ak P,et al.Neurological symptoms associated with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after CEA and CAS-one centre study.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2014,18(8):1176-1180.
    18 Brott TG,Howard G,Roubin GS,et al.Long-term results of stenting versus endarterectomy for carotid-artery stenosis.N Engl J Med,2016,374(11):1021-1031.
    19汪忠镐.汪忠镐血管外科学.杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,2010:780-787.
    20 Liu CY,Chen CQ.Intra-and extracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in China:epidemiology,diagnosis,treatment and risk factors.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2014,18(22):3368-3379.
    21 Sun J,Hatsukami TS.Plaque imaging to decide on optimal treatment:medical versus carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting.Neuroimaging Clin N Am,2016,26(1):165-173.
    22 Botnar RM,Ebersberger H,Noerenberg D,et al.Molecular imaging in cardiovascular diseases.Rofo,2015,36(2):92-101.
    23 Sun DJ,Zhuang AX,Zeng QH,et al.A study of microemboli monitoring of atherosclerotic thrombotic cerebral infarction and artery stenosis.Genet Mol Res,2014,13(3):6734-6745.
    24 Ryoo S,Lee MJ,Cha J,et al.Differential vascular pathophysiologic types of intracranial atherosclerotic stroke:a high-resolution wall magnetic resonance imaging study.Stroke,2015,46(10):2815-2821.
    25 Brugge KT.Regarding training guidelines for endovascular ischemic stroke intervention.Interv Neuroradiol,2016,22(3):253.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.