超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞用于骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折的疼痛治疗效果
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spine plane block for pain management of osteoporosis vertebra compression fracture
  • 作者:张俊 ; 高巍巍 ; 王伍超 ; 葛衡江 ; 陈力勇
  • 英文作者:ZHANG Jun;GAO Wei-wei;WANG Wu-chao;GE Heng-jiang;CHEN Li-yong;Department of Anesthesiology,Daping Hospital,Army Medical University;Department of Pain Medicine,Daping Hospital,Army Medical University;
  • 关键词:椎体骨折 ; 骨质疏松 ; 超声 ; 竖脊肌平面 ; 阻滞 ; 疼痛
  • 英文关键词:vertebra fracture;;osteoporosis;;ultrasound;;erector spine plane;;block;;pain
  • 中文刊名:CXWK
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Traumatic Surgery
  • 机构:陆军军医大学大坪医院麻醉科;陆军军医大学大坪医院疼痛医学科;
  • 出版日期:2019-07-15
  • 出版单位:创伤外科杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.21
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CXWK201907005
  • 页数:7
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:50-1125/R
  • 分类号:23-28+33
摘要
目的 观察及评价超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞(erector spinae plane block)用于骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)的疼痛治疗效果。方法 陆军军医大学大坪医院疼痛科收治42例骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者,男性8例,女性34例;年龄59~86岁,平均75.1岁;BMI 14.5~30.1kg/m~2。采用随机数字表法分为超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞组(ESP组)和对照组,每组21例。ESP组采用基础治疗(卧床休息、镇痛和抗骨质疏松药物、物理治疗)结合ESP阻滞;对照组仅采用基础治疗。两组若出现较严重疼痛,疼痛数字评分法(NRS)≥5分,均使用曲马多肌注缓解。评估ESP组患者入院时(T_1)、第4天ESP阻滞前(T_2),阻滞后2h(T_3)、8h(T_4)、第5天(T_5)、第6天ESP阻滞前(T_6)、阻滞后8h(T_7)、第7天(T_8)、出院后21d(T_9)NRS疼痛评分,以及各相同时间对照组患者NRS评分,两组患者第3天、出院后21d匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI),两组患者第4~7天肌注曲马多需求总次数。结果 ESP组患者行ESP阻滞后NRS评分与入院时、阻滞前比较均下降(P<0.01);出院后21d PSQI与阻滞前比较显著降低(P<0.01)。行ESP阻滞后各时间点NRS评分、曲马多需求量及夜间睡眠质量均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 采用超声引导下ESP阻滞联合基础治疗显著缓解骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者的疼痛,改善睡眠质量,减少阿片类药物的应用,治疗效果显著优于单纯基础治疗。
        Objective To observe and evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided erector spine plane(ESP) block on pain management of patients undergoing osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture(OVCF). Methods Forty-two patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture were randomly assigned to ultrasound-guided erector spine plane block group(ESP group=21) and contrast group(C group=21). ESP group received either basic treatment(analgesic drugs,anti-osteoporosis drugs and physiotherapy) with ultrasound-guided erector spine plane block,and contrast group only received basic treatment. The blocks were performed at the 4 th day and 6 th day. Numerical rating scale(NRS) was assessed in the ESP group at the time of admission(T_1),at the 4 th day before ESP block(T_2),2 hours(T_3)and 8 hours(T_4)after block,at the 5 th day(T_5)and 6 th day(T_6) before ESP blocks and at 8 hours after block(T_7),at the 7 th day(T_8)before block,and at the 21 days after discharge(T_9). NRS score was assessed at the same time point in the C group. Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI) was assessed at the 3 rd day and 21 st day after discharge. The times of demands for tramadol hydrochloride injection were recorded at within the 4 th-7 th day. Results ESP group showed significantly lower NRS score at all time points after ESP blocks than pre-block(P<0.01).The decrease of PSQI was obvious at 21 days after discharge than the 3 rd day(P<0.01).ESP group showed significantly lower NRS score,tramadol hydrochloride injection demands and PSQI than C group after block(P<0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided ESP block combined with basic treatment is more effective to relieve pain,improve sleep quality,reduce the dosage of opioids than basic treatment in patients with osteoporosis vertebra compression fracture.
引文
[1] Forero M,Adhikary SD,Lopez H,et al.The erector spinae plane block:a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,2016,41(5):621.
    [2] Ferreira-Valente MA,Pais-Ribeiro JL,et al.Validity of four pain intensity rating scales[J].Pain,2011,152(10):2399-2404.
    [3] Smyth C.The Pittsburgh sleep quality index PSQI[J].Insight,2003,25(3):97-98.
    [4] 中国健康促进基金会骨质疏松防治中国白皮书编委会.骨质疏松症中国白皮书[J].中华健康管理学杂志,2009,3(3):148-154.
    [5] 中华医学会骨科学分会骨质疏松学组.骨质疏松性骨折诊疗指南[J].中华骨科杂志,2017,37(1):1-10.
    [6] Esses SI,Moro JK.Intraosseous vertebral body pressures[J].Spine,1992,17(S6):155-159.
    [7] 薛祥云,左小华,张前西,等.选择性神经根阻滞术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折疼痛的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2012,32(11):1302-1303.
    [8] 单建林,张阳,单忠林,等.胸腰段椎体压缩性骨折中下腰痛症状观察及机制分析[J].脊柱外科杂志,2015,13(1):33-36.
    [9] Bogduk N,MacVicar J,Borowczyk J.The pain of vertebral compression fractures can arise in the posterior elements[J].Pain Med,2010,11(11):1666-1673.
    [10] 刘宪义,李淳德,于峥嵘,等.胸腰段椎体压缩骨折后远隔部位疼痛的诊治[J].中华医学杂志,2010,90(5):346-348.
    [11] Venmans A,Klazen CA,Lohle PN,et al.Natural history of pain in patients with conservatively treated osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures:results from VERTOS II[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradio,2012,33(3):519-521.
    [12] Klazen CA,Verhaar HJ,Lohle PN,et al.Clinical course of pain in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol,2010,21(9):1405-1409.
    [13] Klazen CA,Lohle PN,De VJ,et al.Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II):an open-label randomised trial[J].Lancet,2010,376(9746):1085-1092.
    [14] Tsoumakidou G,Too CW,Koch G,et al.CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous vertebral augmentation[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radio,2017,40(3):331-342.
    [15] Xie L,Zhao ZG,Zhang SJ,et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures:an updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials[J].Int J Surg,2017,47:25-32.
    [16] Lee HM,Park SY,Lee SH,et al.Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs):conservative treatment versus balloon kyphoplasty[J].Spine J,2012,12(11):998-1005.
    [17] Firanescu CE,Vries JD,Lodder P,et al.Vertebroplasty versus sham procedure for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS IV):randomised sham controlled clinical trial[J].BMJ,2018,361:R1551.
    [18] Solberg J,Copenhaver D,Fishman SM.Medial branch nerve block and ablation as a novel approach to pain related to vertebral compression fracture[J].Curr Opin Anaesthesiol,2016,29(5):596-599.
    [19] 刘长永.分支阻滞对骨质疏松性压缩骨折慢性疼痛的影响[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2014,(Z1):104.
    [20] 黄洪斌,季向荣,林忠凯,等.脊神经后侧支脉冲射频治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折疼痛疗效观察[J].浙江医学,2017,39(5):380-381.
    [21] Huang WC,Lin HC,Lee MH,et al.Percutaneous dorsal root ganglion block for treating lumbar compression fracture-related pain[J].Acta Neurochirurgica,2018,(4):1-7.
    [22] Kamalian S,Bordia R,Ortiz AO.Post-vertebral augmentation back pain:evaluation and management[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradio,2012,33(2):370.
    [23] Adhikary SD,Bernard S,Lopez H,et al.Erector spinae plane block versus retrolaminar block:a magnetic resonance imaging and anatomical study[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,2018,43(7):756-762.
    [24] Ivanusic J,Konishi Y,Barrington MJ.A cadaveric study investigating the mechanism of action of erector spinae blockade[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,2018,43(6):567-571.
    [25] Tulgar S,Selvi O,Senturk O,et al.Clinical experiences of ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block for hip joint and proximal femur surgeries[J].J Clin Anesth,2018,47:5-6.
    [26] 余长兴,陈铮.硬膜外腔注药治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效分析[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2004,10(5):269-270.
    [27] Fink HA,Milavetz DL,Palermo L,et al.What proportion of incident radiographic vertebral deformities is clinically diagnosed and vice versa[J].J Bone Miner Res,2010,20(7):1216-1222.
    [28] Cooper C,Melton LJ.Vertebral fractures:how large is the silent epidemic[J].BMJ,1992,304(6830):793-794.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.