摘要
冯强的新诗批评建立在"道"的基础之上。他的"道"在植根于中国儒家传统的同时与西方传统构成平等对话关系,两者共同指向更具普遍性的共识。以"道"为基础,冯强的新诗批评做出许多深入的判断,比如对"向道"和"取势"的辨析以及"正名"和"风格"的区分等。这些认识对新诗研究和创作极具启发性,有助于中国诗人反思自身,破除迷信,确立自我,也有助于新诗与西方的平等对话。
Feng Qiang's criticism on modern Chinese poetry is based on"Dao". His"Dao"is rooted in the Confucian tradition of China and at the same time constitutes an equal dialogical relationship with the Western tradition. The dialogue between the Confucian tradition of China and the Western tradition leads to a more universal consensus. On the basis of "Tao",Feng Qiang's criticism on modern Chinese poetry has made a lot of insightful statements,such as the distinction between "Pursuing for Dao"and"Following the trend"as well as the distinction between"Rectification of Names"and"Style"and so on. All this might be helpful for Chinese poets to reflect on themselves,break away superstitions and establish their selfidentity. An equal dialogue between Chinese poets and the West is very enlightening to the study and creation of modern Chinese poetry.
引文
[1]吴林伯.《文心雕龙》义疏[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2002.
[2]冯强.新诗海外传播的当代性反思[D].北京:北京师范大学,2013.
[3]杨伯峻,译注.论语译注[M].北京:中华书局,1980.
[4]冯强.杜威经验论中的情感问题:一个当代性的研究[Z].2018.
