电针及温针治疗腰痛病的临床疗效对比
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Electro-acupuncture and Warm Acupuncture in the Treatment of Low Back Pain
  • 作者:张露 ; 全艳 ; 赵敏
  • 英文作者:ZHANG Lu;QUAN Yan;ZHAO Min;Institute of Nursing, Fenyang College, Shanxi Medical University;
  • 关键词:腰痛病 ; 电针 ; 温针 ; 疗效
  • 英文关键词:Low back pain;;Electric acupuncture;;Warm acupuncture;;Curative effect
  • 中文刊名:HZZZ
  • 英文刊名:China & Foreign Medical Treatment
  • 机构:山西医科大学汾阳学院护理学系;
  • 出版日期:2017-11-21
  • 出版单位:中外医疗
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.36
  • 基金:山西医科大学汾阳学院人才引进科研启动基金(1319)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HZZZ201733067
  • 页数:3
  • CN:33
  • ISSN:11-5625/R
  • 分类号:183-184+187
摘要
目的探究腰痛病患者在使用电针及温针治疗后疗效。方法研究对象为方便选取2015年8月—2016年8月该院收入96例腰痛病患者,用随机排列表法分成观察组与对照组,48例采用电针及温针治疗作为对照组,另48例采用药物治疗作为对照组,比较两组患者实施不同治疗对治疗总有效率及下腰痛评分(JOA)影响。结果治疗前两组JOA组间数据差异无统计学意义,治疗后观察组临床特征、主观症状、日常功能首先度以及膀胱功能评分分别为(4.73±0.45)分、(7.13±0.71)分、(12.28±1.39)分、(-1.59±-0.13)分显著比对照组评分高(P<0.05);且总有效率95.83%比对照组77.08%高(χ2=15.011,P<0.05)。结论采用电针及温针对腰痛病患者展开治疗,不仅能提高治疗总有效率,还能提升JOA,具有推广及应用价值。
        Objective This paper tries to explore the curative effect of electroacupuncture and warm needle therapy on patients with low back pain. Methods A total of 96 patients with low back pain from August 2015 to August 2016 were convenient selected in the study and were divided into the observation group and the control group by randomized table method. 48 patients were treated with electroacupuncture and warm acupuncture as the observation group. The other 48 patients were treated with drug therapy as control group. The effects of different treatments on the total effective rate of treatment and the low back pain score(JOA) were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference of JOA between the two groups before treatment. The clinical features, subjective symptoms, daily function first degree and bladder function score of the observation group after treatment were(4.73±0.45)points,(7.13±0.71)points,(12.28±1.39)points,(-1.59±0.13) points respectively, significantly higher than those of the control group(P<0.05); And the total effective rate was 95.83%, higher than the control group of 77.08%(χ2=15.011, P<0.05). Conclusion The use of electroacupuncture and warm needle for the treatment of patients with low back pain not only can improve the total effective rate of treatment, but also enhance the JOA, with the promotion and application value.
引文
[1]赖鑫,阎路达.傅杰英教授针灸调体质治疗慢性腰痛病经验[J].环球中医药,2017,10(7):751-752.
    [2]李文顺,岳旭迎,许金海,等.电针和温针治疗腰痛病疗效对比研究[J].上海针灸杂志,2016,35(7):866-869.
    [3]卢群文,王敏玉,李庆兵,等.罗才贵教授取八髎穴治疗腰痛病经验[J].中国针灸,2014,34(12):1225-1227.
    [4]黄金媛,雷龙鸣,沈燕舞,等.穴位按摩在急性期腰痛病患者便秘护理中的应用[J].护理研究,2016,30(27):3386-3388.
    [5]郭秋蕾,贾文睿,孙启胜,等.《内经》腰痛之经络辨治[J].中国针灸,2017,37(6):658-662.
    [6]汤仙,赵锋,冯进,等.辨证施护对非特异性下腰痛保守治疗疗效的影响[J].湖南中医药大学学报,2015,35(7):57-59.
    [7]石陨,王琳珏,石光,等.基于德尔菲法的《中医治未病实践指南-慢性腰痛易发人群》第2轮专家问卷调查和结果分析[J].河北中医,2017,39(5):669-673.
    [8]夏群,梁威.椎间盘源性腰痛的诊治进展[J].天津医药,2015,43(11):1244-1249.
    [9]黄外军,石啸双,姜爱平,等.电针华佗夹脊穴治疗慢性腰肌劳损的疗效观察[J].国际中医中药杂志,2015,37(4):370-371.
    [10]卢璐,周俊合,刘月,等.天灸治疗腰椎间盘突出症之腰痛的临床疗效研究[J].中国全科医学,2017,20(4):497-500,506.
    [11]David A Fishbain,Brandly Cole,John E Lewis,等.循证综述:慢性腰痛和软组织综合征存在神经病理性疼痛的证据[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2015,21(10):721-731.
    [12]梁飞凡,陈威烨,陈博,等.针灸治疗下腰痛疗效的Meta分析[J].中国骨伤,2016,29(5):449-455.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.