基于能源链的纯电动公交车全生命周期CO_2减排效果研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:CO_2 Emission Reduction Effect of Electric Bus Based on Energy Chain in Life Cycle
  • 作者:王雪然 ; 刘文峰 ; 张龙文 ; 张沫
  • 英文作者:WANG Xue-ran;LIU Wen-feng;ZHANG Long-wen;ZHANG Mo;Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport;Bus Branch of Shenzhen Bus Group Co., Ltd.;
  • 关键词:城市交通 ; CO_2排放 ; 全生命周期评价 ; 电动公交车 ; 能源链 ; 情景分析
  • 英文关键词:urban traffic;;CO_2 emission;;LCA;;electric bus;;energy chain;;scenario analysis
  • 中文刊名:YSXT
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
  • 机构:交通运输部公路科学研究院;深圳巴士集团股份有限公司公共汽车分公司;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:交通运输系统工程与信息
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.19
  • 基金:中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(2017-9052,2018-9053,2018-9065)~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YSXT201901005
  • 页数:7
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:11-4520/U
  • 分类号:23-29
摘要
为准确量化纯电动公交车CO_2减排效果,更好地推动纯电动公交车在城市公交领域的推广应用,本文从能源链角度对纯电动公交车全生命周期的CO_2减排效果进行了研究.基于能源消耗数据,构建了基于能源链的纯电动公交车全生命周期CO_2排放模型;采用单因素敏感性分析法对排放模型的主要影响因素进行了分析,并基于此采用情景分析法建立了CO_2减排效果分析方法;通过实际案例及情景设置分析了现阶段及不同场景下纯电动公交车的CO_2减排效果.结果表明:在相同运营环境下,相比柴油公交车,纯电动公交车能源链全生命周期每百公里可以实现CO_2减排61.20%;在设定的不同情景下,2025年,2035年,2050年纯电动公交车的使用将分别实现每天CO_2减排134 712.36 t,253 566.80 t,326 323.74 t.
        In order to accurately quantify the effect of CO_2 emission reduction of electric bus and promote the popularization and application of electric bus in the field of urban public transportation, this paper studies the CO_2 emission reduction effect of electric buses from the perspective of energy chain. Firstly, the CO_2 emission model of electric bus energy chain is constructed based on the data of energy consumption. Secondly, the main influencing factors of the emission model are analyzed by single factor sensitivity analysis, and the analysis method of CO_2 emission reduction is established based on the scenario analysis method. Finally, through actual cases and scenario settings, the CO_2 emission reduction effect of pure electric buses at different stages is analyzed. The results show that: the life cycle CO_2 emission of the electric bus energy chain is reduced by 61.20% under the same operating environment, compared to the diesel bus; under different scenarios, 134 712.36, 253 566.80, 326 323.74 tons of CO_2 emissions reduction per day are achieved respectively in 2025, 2035, 2050.
引文
[1]中华人民共和国国务院.国务院关于印发“十三五”控制温室气体排放工作方案的通知(国发[2016]61号)[EB].2016.[State Council of the PRC.Notice of the State Council on issuing the work plan for controlling greenhouse gas emissions in 13th Five-Year(No.61[2016])[EB].2016.]
    [2]中华人民共和国交通运输部.中国城市客运发展年度报告[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2017.[Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China.National report on urban passenger transport development[M].Beijing:China Communications Press,2017.]
    [3]程颖,于雷,王宏图,等.基于PEMS的MOBILE与COPERT排放模型对比研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2011,11(3):176-181.[CHENG Y,YU L,WANGH T,et al.Comparative study of MOBILE and COPERTemission models based on PEMS[J].Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,2011,11(3):176-181.]
    [4]郝艳召,王宏图,宋国华,等.中观机动车尾气模型在中国的适用性[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2016,36(1):112-119.[HAO Y Z,WANG H T,SONG G H,et al.Suitability of meso-level vehicle emission model in China[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition),2016,36(1):112-119.]
    [5]高艺,虞明远,余艳春,等.公路运输温室气体排放清单的建立方法[J].公路交通科技,2013,30(3):153-158.[GAO Y,YU M Y,YU Y C,et al.Development of GHG emission inventory for road transport[J].Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2013,30(3):153-158.]
    [6]谭丕强,李洁,胡志远,等.柴油公交车燃用不同替代燃料的排放特性[J].交通运输工程学报,2013,13(4):67-73.[TAN P Q,LI J,HU Z Y,et al.Emission characteristics of diesel bus burning different alternative fuels[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2013,13(4):67-73.]
    [7]DELUCHI M,WANG Q,SPERLING D.Electric vehicles:Performance,life-cycle costs,emissions,and recharging requirements[J].Transportation Research Part A General,1989,23(3):255-278.
    [8]李书华.电动汽车全生命周期分析及环境效益评价[D].长春:吉林大学,2014.[LI S H.Life cycle assessment and environmental benefits analysis of electric vehicles[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2014.]
    [9]HAWKINS T R,SINGH B,MAJEAU-BETTEZ G,et al.Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology,2013,17(1):53-64.
    [10]BRADY,JOHN,O'MAHONY,et al.Travel to work in Dublin,the potential impacts of electric vehicles on climate change and urban air quality[J].Transportation Research Part D Transport&Environment,2011,16(2):188-193.
    [11]OU X,ZHANG X,CHANG S.Alternative fuel buses currently in use in China:Life-cycle fossil energy use,GHG emissions and policy recommendations[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(1):406-418.
    [12]OU X,YAN X,ZHANG X.Using coal for transportation in China:Life cycle GHG of coal-based fuel and electric vehicle,and policy implications[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2010,4(5):878-887.
    [13]IPCC.2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories[R].Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme,Eggleston H.S.,Buendia L.,Miwa K.,Ngara T.and Tanabe K.(eds).Published:IGES,Japan.
    [14]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB19147-2009车用柴油[S].北京:中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会,2009.[AQSIQ,Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China,SAC.GB19147-2009 Automotive diesel oil[S].Beijing:AQSIQ,Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China,SAC,2009.]
    [15]SHEN W,HAN W,CHOCK D,et al.Well-to-wheels life-cycle analysis of alternative fuels and vehicle technologies in China[J].Energy Policy,2012(49):296-307.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.