管理层激励的盈余管理及股东财富增长——来自考核基期的证据
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Management-motivated Earnings Management and Shareholder Wealth Growth:Evidence from the Base Period of Assessment
  • 作者:程果 ; 蒋水全
  • 英文作者:CHENG Guo;JIANG Shuiquan;Faculty of Economics and Management,East China Normal University;School of Accounting,Chongqing Technology and Business University;
  • 关键词:股权激励 ; 考核基期 ; 真实盈余管理 ; 股东财富 ; 累计超额回报率 ; 委托代理 ; 高管权力
  • 英文关键词:equity incentive;;base period;;real earnings management;;shareholder wealth;;accumulated excess returns;;agency by agreement;;executive power
  • 中文刊名:NJSJ
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Nanjing Audit University
  • 机构:华东师范大学经济与管理学部;重庆工商大学会计学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-29 17:06
  • 出版单位:南京审计大学学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.16;No.77
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:NJSJ201903004
  • 页数:10
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:32-1867/F
  • 分类号:32-41
摘要
减少代理成本、促进股东财富增长是股权激励的主要目的之一,但它也可能因为管理层机会主义而变得无效。因此,考察股权激励样本在考核基期的真实盈余管理情况及其在股权激励草案公告日前后的股东财富效应颇有意义。研究发现:激励样本在股权激励考核基期存在负向的真实盈余管理,激励草案的公告能够显著增加股东财富,股东财富增加的幅度与公司业绩和行权考核条件高低正相关,但是剔除盈余管理的影响后,公司业绩与股东财富增长不相关。研究表明:股权激励草案的公告虽然增加了股东财富,但在考核基期也存在盈余管理,这种盈余管理削弱了公司业绩与股东财富增长之间的正相关关系。
        Reducing agency costs and promoting shareholder wealth is one of the main purposes of equity incentive,but it may also be ineffective because of management opportunism. Therefore,it is of significance to investigate the real earnings management of equity incentive samples in the base period and the shareholder wealth effect before and after the announcement date of equity incentive draft. The study finds that there is a negative real earnings management in the incentive sample in the base period,and the announcement of the equity incentive drafts significantly increases the shareholder wealth of the samples. The increase of shareholders' wealth is positively correlated with the performance of the company and the assessment conditions of exercising rights. However,after eliminating the influence of earnings management,the performance of the company is not related to the growth of shareholder wealth. The research shows that the announcement of equity incentive draft increases the shareholder wealth,but the earnings management also exists in the base period of equity incentive, which weakens the positive correlation between company performance and shareholder wealth growth.
引文
[1]吴德胜,王栋.中国业绩型股权激励公告前的盈余操纵[J]审计与经济研究,2015(5):66-75.
    [2]Gao P,Shrieves R E.Earnings management and executive Compensation:A case of overdose of option and underdose of salary?[J].SSRN Electronic Journal,2002,5(2):121-134.
    [3]肖淑芳,张晨宇,张超,轩然.股权激励计划公告前的盈余管理--来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].南开管理评论,2009(4):113-127.
    [4]肖淑芳,刘颖,刘洋.股票期权实施中经理人盈余管理行为研究--行权业绩考核指标设置角度[J]会计研究,2013(12):40-46.
    [5]谢德仁,陈运森.业绩型股权激励、行权业绩条件与股东财富增长[J].金融研究,2010(12):99-114.
    [6]陈艳艳.股权激励能够增加股东财富吗?[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,(3):12-18.
    [7]BartonJ,SimkoP.The balance sheet asan earnings management constraint[J].Accounting Review,2002,77(4):1-27.
    [8]Morgan A G,Poulsen A B.Linking pay to performance-compensation proposals in the S&P 500[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2001,62(3):489-523.
    [9]李曜.两种股权激励方式的特征、应用与证券市场反应的比较研究[J]财贸经济,2009(1):42-48.
    [10]吕长江,郑慧莲,严明珠.上市公司股权激励制度设计:是激励,还是福利?[J].管理世界,2009(9):133-147.
    [11]陆瑶,沈小力.股票价格信息含量与盈余管理--基于中国股市的实证分析[J]金融研究,2011(3):131-146.
    [12]许娟娟,陈艳,陈志阳.股权激励、盈余管理与公司绩效[J]山西财经大学学报,2016(3):100-112.
    [13]孙健,卢闯.高管权力、股权激励强度与市场反应[J]中国软科学,2012(4):135-142.
    [14]王君彩,张娟.股权激励、市场反应与公司治理效果--基于创业板上市公司的研究[J]中央财经大学学报,2016(5):53-59.
    [15]刘银国,孙慧倩,王烨.股票期权激励、行权业绩条件与真实盈余管理[J]管理工程学报,2018(2):128-136.
    [16]Dechow P M,Sloan R G,Sweeney A P.Detecting earnings management[J].Accounting Review,1995,70(2):193-225.
    [17]Lian Y,Su Z,Gu Y.Evaluating the effects of equity incentives using PSM:Evidence from China[J].Frontiers of Business Research in China,2011,5(2):266-290.
    [18]卢闯,孙健,张修平.股权激励与上市公司投资行为--基于倾向得分配对方法的分析[J].中国软科学,2015(5):13-19.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.