摘要
能力建设是反贫困的一个重要思路,通过对贫困群体进行增能有助于帮助他们可持续脱贫。要切实提升贫困群体的能力,需要找到关键性的影响变量。通过对一个增能范本案例的深度分析发现,在对贫困群体进行增能的过程中,建构贫困群体对增能的文化共鸣至关重要。文化共鸣程度对贫困群体能力建设具有阀门效应,弱文化共鸣会导致贫困群体的能力增长"内卷化",强文化共鸣能促成贫困群体能力"线性"增长。文化共鸣的诞生与增能过程中所使用的符号和互动方式密切相关。经过修辞化了的符号为增能的互动提供了基础,制度化的互动又能将符号意义变得显现化和固化,二者的良性互动有助于建构贫困群体的文化共鸣。符号、互动与文化共鸣的关系特点为深度推进精准扶贫以及对反贫困中的宣传与帮扶方案的制定等提供了有效借鉴。
Capacity building is an important way to combat poverty. Through the empowerment of poor groups,it can help them to achieve poverty alleviation.To effectively improve the capabilities of poor groups,it is necessary to find key impact variables.Through an in-depth analysis of an example of an empowering model,it is found that in the process of empowering poor groups,building a poor group is crucial to the cultural resonance of empowerment.The degree of cultural resonance has a valve effect on the capacity building of poor groups. The weak cultural resonance will lead to the"involution"of the capacity growth of the poor groups. Strong cultural resonance can promote the"linear"growth of the ability of the poor.The birth of cultural resonance is closely related to the symbols and interactions used in the process of empowerment.The rhetorical symbols provide the basis for the interaction of empowerment,and the institutionalized interaction can visualize and solidify the symbolic meaning.The benign interaction between the two helps to construct the cultural resonance of the poor.The relationship between symbol,interaction and cultural resonance provides an effective reference for deepening the promotion of precision poverty alleviation,propaganda in anti-poverty,and the formulation of assistance programs.
引文
[1]决胜全面小康关键年习近平布局三大攻坚战[EB/OL].(2017-12-24).http:∥www.chinanews.com/gn/2017/12-24/8407844.shtml.
[2] NICHOLAS B.Economic Theory and the Welfare State:A Survey and Interpretation[J].Journal of Economic Literature,1992(2):741-803.
[3]简·米勒.解析社会保障[M].郑飞北,杨慧,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2012.
[4] NEIL G,PAUL T.社会福利政策导论[M].黄晨曦,周烨,刘红,译.上海:华东理工大学出版社,2003.
[5]阿马蒂亚·森.以自由看待发展[M].任顿,于真,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[6] SHELDON D,IRWIN G,ROBERT H.Poverty,Welfare and Earnings:A New Approach[J].Challenge,1979(4):28-34.
[7]卫小将.精准扶贫中群众的主体性塑造——基于赋权理论视角[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2017(5):80-85.
[8]赵映雪.从“假赋权”到“真赋权”——城市贫困儿童小组社会工作的实践反思[D].长春:长春工业大学,2017.
[9]米歇尔·拉芒,马里奥·路易斯·斯莫尔,黄照静.文化多样性与反贫困政策[J].国际社会科学杂志(中文版),2011(2):70-81.
[10]古学斌,张和清,杨锡聪.专业限制与文化识盲:农村社会工作实践中的文化问题[J].社会学研究,2007(6):161-179.
[11]张国安.贵州反贫困的历程与文化变迁[J].贵阳学院学报(社会科学版),2002(3):5-8.
[12]姚金丹.社会工作增能视角下失独家庭的分析[J].社会工作,2012(10):24-27.
[13]程萍.社会工作介入农村精准扶贫:阿马蒂亚·森的赋权增能视角[J].社会工作,2016(5):15-23.
[14]王三秀,罗丽娅.国外能力贫困理念的演进、理论逻辑及现实启示[J].长白学刊,2016(5):120-126.
[15]北京大学社会学系嘉里郭氏基金脱贫模式课题组.理想主义与现实改造[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016.
[16]露丝·本尼迪克特.文化模式[M].王炜,等译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009.
[17]熊文渊.可行能力视角下高校教育扶贫的转向[J].重庆高教研究,2017(5):120-127.
[18] BUIJS A E,ARTS B J M,ELANDS B H M,et al.Beyond environmental frames:The social representation and cultural resonance of nature in conflicts over a Dutch woodland[J].Geoforum,2011(3):329-341.
[19] ROWLING C M,JONES T M,SHEETS P.Some Dared Call It Torture:Cultural Resonance,Abu Ghraib,and a Selectively Echoing Press[J].Journal of Communication,2011(6):1043-1061.
[20]范楠楠.符码与学校文化的共振效应[J].教育科学论坛,2010(12):5-7.
[21]陈成文.从“内卷化”看精准扶贫资源配置的矫正机制设计[J].贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版),2017(1):36-44.
[22]罗伯特·霍奇,冈瑟·克雷斯.社会符号学[M].周劲松,张碧,译.成都:四川教育出版社,2012.
[23]赵毅衡.符号学原理与推演[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2011.
[24]邵兰.符号互动理论与旅游形象的确立[D].苏州:苏州大学,2004.
[25]欧文·戈夫曼.日常生活中的自我呈现[M].冯钢,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
