探空仪湿度测量误差研究现状及其对云识别的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on Humidity Measurement Error of Radiosonde and Its Influence on Cloud Recognition
  • 作者:孙丽 ; 赵姝慧
  • 英文作者:Sun Li;Zhao Shuhui;Weather Modification Office of Liaoning Province;
  • 关键词:湿度 ; 探空仪 ; 测量误差 ; 云识别
  • 英文关键词:Humidity;;Radiosonde;;Measurement error;;Cloud recognition
  • 中文刊名:DXJZ
  • 英文刊名:Advances in Earth Science
  • 机构:辽宁省人工影响天气办公室;
  • 出版日期:2018-01-10
  • 出版单位:地球科学进展
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.33;No.279
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目“西伯利亚生物质燃烧气团远距离传输对中国东北地区大气环境的影响”(编号:41705127);; 辽宁省气象局科研项目“辽宁省人工增雨作业云系性质和垂直结构特征研究”(编号:Y201502)资助~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:DXJZ201801009
  • 页数:8
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:62-1091/P
  • 分类号:89-96
摘要
探空湿度观测是获取湿度资料的重要手段,探空仪湿度传感器的性能会直接影响湿度的测量结果并对基于探空湿度资料识别的云层准确性造成影响。为更好地了解目前国内外探空仪湿度测量的准确性,回顾了大量国内外研究成果,简要介绍了国内外探空仪的类型及湿度传感器性能,归纳了探空仪湿度测量误差并探讨了湿度测量误差对云识别的影响。分析发现,探空仪湿度测量误差来源多样,是多种因素综合作用的结果。一般而言,在对流层低层温度较高的条件下,湿度测量的结果较为准确,云层识别较为可靠;但湿度传感器在低温条件下响应时间变长、灵敏度下降,导致云底的识别准确性要高于云顶,而识别的中、高云偏少;而高湿条件下,测湿元件易被沾湿,导致湿度异常偏高,从而使得识别的云层偏厚;探空仪普遍存在湿度异常偏低的情况,尤其是湿度较高的测站,从而导致云层漏判。
        Sounding observation of humidity is an important means of obtaining the atmospheric humidity data.The measurement results of humidity and accuracy of cloud recognition based on that are directly affected by the performance of the radiosonde humidity sensor.In order to better understand the accuracy of the current measurement of the radiosonde at home and abroad,a large number of research results are reviewed.The types of radiosonde and the performance of its humidity sensor are briefly introduced.Moreover,the influence of humidity measurement error on cloud recognition is also discussed.The results show that the error sources of radiosonde humidity measurement are various and it's a comprehensive result of many factors.In general,accuracy of humidity measurement is more reliable in the low troposphere with high temperature and so with the cloud identification by the humidity.However,the response time is longer and sensitivity of humidity sensor is lower at low temperature,which results in the accuracy of cloud bottom recognition being higher than that of cloud top while the medium and high cloud recognized by radiosonde being less than the reality.Moreover,under high-humidity conditions,the humidity sensors are easily wetted,which leads to the abnormally high value of humidity and resulting in thicker cloud.Furthermore,the radiosonde generally has low humidity anomalies,especially when the synoptic station with high humidity,resulting in missing report of cloud.
引文
[1]Qin Yanyan,Li Bai,Zhang Peiyuan.A study of the relationship between radar reflectivity of rain and relative humidity of atmosphere[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences,2006,30(2):351-359.[秦琰琰,李柏,张沛源.降水的雷达反射率因子与大气相对湿度的相关关系研究[J].大气科学,2006,30(2):351-359.]
    [2]Ye Chengzhi,Li Yunying,Li Zuxian.Numerical study on the water vapor transports of the two landfalling cyclones affecting Hunan Province[J].Plateau Meteorology,2009,28(1):98-107.[叶成志,李昀英,黎祖贤.两次严重影响湖南的登陆台风水汽场特征数值模拟[J].高原气象,2009,28(1):98-107.]
    [3]Miao Aimei,Wu Jie,Zhao Haiying,et al.Statistical relation and flow pattern of low-level jet and heavy rainstorm in Shanxi[J].Plateau Meteorology,2010,29(4):939-946.[苗爱梅,武捷,赵海英,等.低空急流与山西大暴雨的统计关系及流型配置[J].高原气象,2010,29(4):939-946.]
    [4]Ding Yihui,Liu Yanju.Analysis of long-term variations of fog and haze in China in recent 50 years and their relations with atmospheric humidity[J].Science in China(Series D),2010,44(1):37-48.[丁一汇,柳艳菊.近50年我国雾和霾的长期变化特征及其与大气湿度的关系[J].中国科学:D辑,2010,44(1):37-48.]
    [5]Cai Miao,Zhou Yuquan,Ou Jianjun,et al.Study on diagnosing three dimensional cloud region[J].Plateau Meteorology,2015,34(5):1 330-1 344.[蔡淼,周毓荃,欧建军,等.三维云场分布诊断方法的研究[J].高原气象,2015,34(5):1 330-1 344.]
    [6]Han Chengming,Li Yaodong,Shi Xiaokang.Overview of researches on cloud analysis and prediction methods[J].Advances in Earth Science,2015,30(4):505-516.[韩成鸣,李耀东,史小康.云分析预报方法研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2015,30(4):505-516.]
    [7]Kang Xinjuan.The method for forest fire risk level prediction in Chengcheng County[J].Shaanxi Forestry,2008,(4):24.[康新娟.澄城县森林火险等级预报方法[J].陕西林业,2008,(4):24.]
    [8]Zhou Yuquan,Ou Jianjun.The method of cloud vertical structure analysis using rawinsonde observation and its applied research[J].Meteorology Monthly,2010,36(11):50-58.[周毓荃,欧建军.利用探空数据分析云垂直结构的方法及其应用研究[J].气象,2010,36(11):50-58.]
    [9]Poore K D,Wang J,Rossow W B.Cloud layer thicknesses from a combination of surface and upper-air observations[J].Journal of Climate,1995,8:550-568.
    [10]Wang J,Rossow W B.Determination of cloud vertical structure from upper-air observations[J].Journal of Applied Meteorology,1995,34:2 243-2 258.
    [11]Arabey E N.Radiosonde data as means for revealing cloud layers[J].Meteorologiia i Gidrologia,1975,6:32-37.
    [12]Chernykh I V,Eskridge R E.Determination of cloud amount and level from radiosonde soundings[J].Journal of Applied Meteorology,1996,35:1 362-1 369.
    [13]Minnis P,Yi Y H,Huang J P,et al.Relationships between radiosonde and RUC-2 meteorological conditions and cloud occurrence determined from ARM data[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2005,110(D2).DOI:12.1029/2005JD006005.
    [14]Wang J,Rossow W B,Uttal T,et al.Variability of cloud vertical structure during ASTEX observed from a combination of rawinsonde,radar,ceilometer,and satellite[J].Monthly Weather Review,1999,127:2 482-2 502.
    [15]Slingo J M.A cloud parameterization scheme derived from GATE data for use with a numerical model[J].Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society,1980,106:747-770.
    [16]Han D,Ellingson R G.A experimental technique for testing the validity of cumulus cloud parameterizations for longwave radiation calculations[J].Journal of Applied Meteorology,2000,39:1 147-1 159.
    [17]Zhang J Q,Chen H B,Li Z Q.Analysis of cloud layer structure in Shouxian,China using RS92 radiosonde aided by 95 GHz cloud radar[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2010,115:D00K30.DOI:10.1029/2010JD014030.
    [18]Zhang J Q,Chen H B,Bian J C,et al.Development of cloud detection methods using CFH,GTS1,and RS80 radiosondes[J].Advances in Atmospheric Sciences,2012,29(2):236-248.
    [19]Cai Miao,Ou Jianjun,Zhou Yuquan,et al.Discriminating cloud area by using L-band sounding data[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences,2014,38(2):213-222.[蔡淼,欧建军,周毓荃,等.L波段探空判别云区方法的研究[J].大气科学,2014,38(2):213-222.]
    [20]Xu Wenjing,Guo Yatian,Huang Binxun,et al.Analysis of GTS radiosonde humidity sensor testing data and correction of upperair relative humidity radiosonde data[J].Meteorological Science and Technology,2007,35(3):423-428.[徐文静,郭亚田,黄炳勋,等.GTS探空仪碳湿敏元件性能测试数据分析及相对湿度订正[J].气象科技,2007,35(3):423-428.]
    [21]Suortti T M,Lats A,Kivi R,et al.Tropospheric comparisons of vaisala radiosondes and balloon-borne frost-point and lyman-αhygrometers during the LAUTLOS-WAVVAP experiment[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2008,6(25):149-166.
    [22]V9mel H,David D,Smith K.Accuracy of tropospheric and stratospheric water vapor measurements by the cryogenic frost point hygrometer:Instrumental details and observations[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2007,112:D08305.DOI:10.1029/2006JD007224.
    [23]Li Wei.Capacity analysis on China-made HS02 humidity sensitive capacitor sensor[J].Plateau Meteorology,2012,31(2):568-580.[李伟.国产HS02型湿敏电容湿度传感器性能分析[J].高原气象,2012,31(2):568-580.]
    [24]Fujiwara M,Shiotani M,Hasebe F,et al.Performance of the meteolabor“Snow White”chilled mirror hygrometer in the tropical troposphere:Comparisons with the Vaisala RS-80 A/H humicap sensors[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2003,20:1 534-1 542.
    [25]Li Wei,Xing Yi,Ma Shuqing.The analysis and comparison between GTS1 radiosonde made in China and RS92 radiosonde of Vaisala company[J].Meteorology Monthly,1999,35(10):97-102.[李伟,邢毅,马舒庆.国产GTS1探空仪与VAISALA公司RS92探空仪对比分析[J].气象,2009,35(10):97-102.]
    [26]Lu Yi.Some humidity sensors in digital radiosondes[J].Meteorological,Hydrological and Marine Instruments,2009,(3):162-165.[卢轶.用于数字式电子探空仪的几种湿度传感器[J].气象水文海洋仪器,2009,(3):162-165.]
    [27]Xu Wenjing,Guo Yatian,Huang Bingxun,et al.Analysis of GTS radiosonde humidity sensor testing data and correction of upper-air relative humidity radiosonde data[J].Meteorological Science and Technology,2007,35(3):423-428.[徐文静,郭亚田,黄炳勋,等.GTS探空仪碳湿敏元件性能测试数据分析及相对湿度订正[J].气象科技,2007,35(3):423-428.]
    [28]Li Wei.Capacity analysis on China-made HS02 humidity sensitive capacitor sensor[J].Plateau Meteorology,2012,31(2):568-580.[李伟.国产HS02型湿敏电容湿度传感器性能分析[J].高原气象,2012,31(2):568-580.]
    [29]Li Wei,Zhao Peitao,Guo Qiyun,et al.The international radiosonde intercomparison results for China-made GPS radiosonde[J].Journal of Applied Meteorological Science,2011,2(4):453-462.[李伟,赵培涛,郭启云,等.国产GPS探空仪国际比对试验结果[J].应用气象学报,2011,2(4):453-462.]
    [30]Li Feng,Xing Yi,Yang Rongkang.Analysis on measure ability of Chinese-developed GPS sounding technology[J].Meteorological Science and Technology,,2012,40(4):513-519.[李峰,邢毅,杨荣康.国产GPS探空系统探测能力分析[J].气象科技,2012,40(4):513-519.]
    [31]Verver G,Fujiwara M,Dolmans P,et al.Performance of the Vaisala RS80A/H and RS90 humicap sensors and the meteolabor“Snow White”chilled-mirror hygrometer in Paramaribo,Suriname[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2006,23(11):1 506-1 518.DOI:10/1175/JTECH1941.1.
    [32]Wang J,Cole H L,Carlson D J,et al.Corrections of humidity measurement errors from the Vaisala RS80 radiosonde-application to TOGA COARE data[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2002,19:981-1 002.
    [33]Miloshevich L,V9mel H,Paukkunen A,et al.Development and validation of a time-lag correction for Vaisala radiosonde humidity measurements[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2004,21:1 305-1 327.
    [34]Miloshevich L,V9mel H,Whiteman D,et al.Absolute accuracy of water vapor measurements from six operational radiosonde types launched during AWEX-G,and implications for AIRS validation[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2009,111:D09S10.DOI:10.1029/2005JD006083.
    [35]Turner D D,Lesht B M,Clough S A,et al.Dry bias and variability in Vaisala RS80-H radiosondes:The ARM experience[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2003,20:117-132.
    [36]Ash J,Smout R,Smees M,et al.RA III radiosonde training workshop,Buenos Aires,May 2006[C]∥Papers and Posters Presented at the WMO Technical Conference on Instruments and methods of Observation(TECO-2006).Geneva:WMO,2006:6.
    [37]Nash J,Oakley T,V9mel H,et al.Measurement of upper-air pressure,temperature and humidity[C]∥Instrument and Observation Methods Report.Geneva:WMO,2011:51.
    [38]Miloshevich L,V9mel H,Whiteman D,et al.Absolute accuracy of water vapor measurements from six operational radiosonde types launched during AWEX-G and implications for AIRS validation[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2006,111:D09S10.
    [39]Miloshevich L,V9mel H,Paukkunen A,et al.Characterization and correction of relative humidity measurements from Vaisala RS80—A radiosondes at cold temperatures[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2001,18:135-156.
    [40]V9mel H,Selkirk H,Miloshevich L,et al.Radiation dry bias of the Vaisala RS92 humidity sensor[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2007,24:953-963.
    [41]Yao Wen,Ma Ying,Xu Wenjing.Relative humidity error of Lband electronic radiosonde and its application[J].Journal of Applied Meteorological Science,2008,19(3):356-361.[姚雯,马颖,徐文静.L波段电子探空仪相对湿度误差研究及其应用[J].应用气象学报,2008,19(3):356-361.]
    [42]WMO.Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation(V7.0)[Z].Geneva,2006.
    [43]Li Wei,Zhao Peitao,Guo Qiyun,et al.The analysis of Yangjiang international radiosonde intercomparison results for Chinese GTS1-2 electronic radiosonde[J].Meteorological Monthly,2011,37(11):1 466-1 472.[李伟,赵培涛,郭启云,等.中国GTS1-2型电子探空仪阳江国际比对结果分析[J].气象,2011,37(11):1 466-1 472.]
    [44]Rowe P M,Miloshevich L M,Turner D D,et al.Dry bias in Vaisala RS90 radiosonde humidity profiles over Antarctita[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2008,25:1 529-1 541.
    [45]Tang Nanjun.L-band Radiosonde System Relative Humidity Observation Error and Its Feature[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University of Information,Science and Technology,2013.[唐南军.L波段探空系统相对湿度的观测误差特征[D].南京:南京信息工程大学,2013.]
    [46]Bian J C,Chen H B,V9mel H,et al.Intercomparison of humidity and temperature sensors:GTS1,Vaisala RS80,and CFH[J].Advances in Atmospheric Sciences,2011,28(1):139-146.
    [47]Guo Qiyun,Zhao Peitao,Zhang Yucun,et al.Technical improvement and experimental analysis of GTS1 radiosonde[J].Meteorological Science and Technology,2013,41(2):254-258.[郭启云,赵培涛,张玉存,等.GTS1型探空仪技术改进对比试验[J].气象科技,2013,41(2):254-258.]
    [48]Xie Q,Huang K,Wang D X,et al.Intercomparison of GPS radiaosonde soundings during the eastern tropical Indian Ocean experiment[J].Acta Oceanologica Sinca,2014,30(1):127-134.
    [49]Guo Qiyun,Li Feng,Guo Kai,et al.Comparative analysis of new GPS and GTS1-2 radiosonde[J].Meteorological Science and Technology,2015,43(1):59-64,75.[郭启云,李峰,郭凯,等.新型GPS探空仪与业务GTS1-2探空仪对比分析[J].气象科技,2015,43(1):59-64,75.]
    [50]Ma Shuqing,Zhao Zhiqiang,Xing Yi.Vaisala’s radiosonde technology and advancement in radiosonde technology in China[J].Meteorological Science and Technology,2005,33(5):390-393.[马舒庆,赵志强,刑毅.Vaisala探空技术及中国探空技术的发展[J].气象科技,2005,33(5):390-393.]
    [51]Zhao Shijun,Su Xiaoyong,Gao Taichang.Performance analysis of RS92 radiosonde for sounding temperature,pressure,and humidity[J].Meteorological Science and Technology,2012,40(1):31-34.[赵世军,苏小勇,高太长.RS92探空仪温压湿测量性能分析[J].气象科技,2012,40(1):31-34.]
    [52]Costa-Surós M,CalbóJ,Gonzalez J,et al.Comparing the cloud vertical structure derived from several methods based on radiosonde profiles and ground-based remote sensing measurements[J].Atmospheric Measurement Techniques,2014,7:2 757-2 773.
    [53]Naud C,Muller J P,Clothiaux E E.Comparison between active sensor and radiosonde cloud boundaries over the ARM Southern Great Plains site[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2003,108(D4):4 140.DOI:10.1029/2002JD002887.
    [54]Yan Xiaolu,Zheng Xiangdong,Li Wei,et al.Inter-comparison and application of atmospheric humidity profiles measured by CFH and Vaisala RS80 radiosondes[J].Journal of Applied Meteorological Science,2012,23(4):433-440.[颜晓露,郑向东,李蔚,等.2012.两种探空仪观测湿度垂直分布及其应用比较[J].应用气象学报,2012,23(4):433-440.]
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.