摘要
以广布湿生藓类——湿地匐灯藓(Plagiomnium acutum)为比较材料,研究东亚特有濒危植物尖叶拟船叶藓(Dolichomitriopsis diversiformis)在不同快速脱水和复水胁迫下PSⅡ的叶绿素光合荧光变化和活性氧代谢及抗氧化系统变化,探讨两种藓类生理生态适应性差异的成因,以初步确定尖叶拟船叶藓受水分条件限制分布狭窄趋于濒危的原因。结果显示:(1)尖叶拟船叶藓的光合电子传递在脱水后可被极微弱光完全抑制,其抑制光强的恢复明显慢于湿地匐灯藓;其PSⅡ最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)和实际光化学量子效率(YⅡ)先降而后升,恢复较慢;光化学淬灭(q P)复水后恢复较快,非光化学淬灭(NPQ)的绝对值和变化速率则始终低于湿地匐灯藓。(2)尖叶拟船叶藓活性氧水平明显高于湿地匐灯藓;其SOD、CAT、APX等抗氧化系统酶活性整体变化幅度较大,抗氧化保护物质(As A)含量则明显低于湿地匐灯藓。以上结果表明尖叶拟船叶藓受到环境水分因子限制的原因主要有:(1)PSⅡ的反应中心色素(P680)对脱水伤害较为敏感;(2)复水修复过程中抗氧化保护系统的保护能力偏低。
Dolichomitriopsis diversiformis,an endangered moss species which is unique to East Asia,is now distributed in a very narrow area. From our early field investigation of its habitat,we found that the species is restricted by moisture content of atmosphere and growth matrix. In order to disclose the endangered mechanism of D. diversiformis under water stress,and to elucidate eco-physiological differences of bryophytes in similar humidity habitat,Plagiomnium acutum,a widespread species was selected to compare with D. diversiformis. Therefore, their photosynthetic chlorophyll characteristics of phtosystem Ⅱ( PSⅡ),such as electron transport rate( ETR)- photosynthetic available radiation( PAR) curves,maximal photochemical efficiency( Fv / Fm),photosystem quantum yielding( Y( Ⅱ)),photochemical qunching( q P) and nonphotochemical qunching( NPQ) were detected by PAM 2500 and IMAGING PAM. Furthermore,metabolism of reactiveoxygen species( superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide),activities of antioxidative enzymes( superoxide dismutase( SOD),catalase( CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase( APX)) and content of ascorbic acid( ASA) in the two moss species during desiccation and rehydration were determined in our studies. Results of ETR-PAR curve indicated that desiccation reduced the inhibitory light density of both species; but when water content recovered,the inhibitory light density restored to normal status. Compared with P. acutum,ETR of D. diversiformis was blocked completely by very weak light density after60 min dehydration and recovered much more slowly in rehydration. And the results of other PSⅡ chlorophyll fluorescence characters also gave similar evidences. Fv / Fm and Y Ⅱ of both bryophytes were decreased under desiccation and then increased in rehydraion,but the value of D. diversiformis declined more quickly during desiccation and recovered more slowly in rehydration. That is to say,photosynthetic electron transport of PSⅡ in D. diversiformis can be not only reduced by water loss but also destroyed completely by deep desiccation. Meanwhile,variation of q P and NPQ of both species manifested an interesting occurance. q P of D. diversiformis declined more quickly than P. acutum in desiccation and returned to normal condition much more quickly than that of P. acutum. In other words,photosynthetic reaction which is represented by photochemical qunching is protected primarily in D. diversiformis. But photochemical quenching restoration would bring out more production of reactive oxygen species. Otherwise,though NPQ of both species increased in desiccation and decrease in rehydration,yet the absolute value of D. diversiformis maintained a relative low level. These results suggested that the photo-protective mechanism supported by xanthophyll cycle in D. diversiformis should be weaker than in P. acutum.All these results indicate that PS Ⅱ of D. diversiformis,especially reaction central pigment( P680) is more sensitive to dehydration than P. acutum. Results of reactive oxygen species metabolism showed that absolute value of superoxide anion production and hydrogen peroxide content in D. diversiformis were significantly higher than in P. acutum. Furthermore,though anti-oxidative enzymes, such as SOD, CAT, APX also increased similar of reactive oxygen species under desiccation,yet their activities in D. diversiformis decreased more quickly in rehydration. In conclusion,the sensitivity of photosystem Ⅱ and the low efficiency of antioxidative system in rehydration are probably two major eco-physiological restricting factors of D. diversiformis narrow distribution.
引文
[1]Dhindsa R S.Glutathione status and protein synthesis during drought and subsequent rehydration in Tortula ruralis.Plant Physiology,1987,83(4):816-819.
[2]Oliver M J,Velten J,Wood A J.Bryophytes as experimental models for the study of environmental stress tolerance:Tortula ruralis and desiccation-tolerance in mosses.Plant Ecology,2000,151(1):73-84.
[3]Zsolt C,Proctor M C F,Tuba Z.Chlorophyll fluorescence during drying and rehydration in the mosses Rhytidiadelphus loreus(Hedw.)warnst.,Anomodon viticulosus(Hedw.)Hook.&Tayl.and Grimmmia pulvinata(Hedw.)sm.Annals of Botany,1999,84(2):235-244.
[4]Proctor M C F,Oliver M J,Wood A J,Alpert P,Stark L R,Cleavitt N L,Mishler B D.Desiccation-tolerance in bryophytes:a review.The Bryologist,2007,110(4):595-621.
[5]Oliver M J,Velten J,Mishler B D.Desiccation tolerance in bryophytes:a reflection of the primitive strategy for plant survival in dehydrating habitats?Integrative and Comparative Biology,2005,45(5):788-799.
[6]Wei M L,Zhang Y M,Zhang J.Microscopic and Submicroscopic Structure of Leaf Cells of Syntrichia caninervis Mitt.In Biological Soil Crusts.Journal of Desert Research,2009,29(3):493-498.
[7]Li X R,Zhang Y M,Zhao Y G.A Study of Biological Soil Crusts Recent Development Trend and Prospect.Advances in Earth Science,2009,24(1):11-24.
[8]Shi Y,Yang X J,Zhao X,Li X R.Responses of signal transduction substances of Didymodon vinealis and Bryum argenteum in biological soil crust to drought stress.Chinese Journal of Ecology,2012,31(5):1136-1142.
[9]Wei M L,Zhang Y M.Effects of Dehydration on Photosynthetic Pigment Content and Chlooplast Ultrastructure of Syntrichia caninervis in Biological Soil Crusts.Journal of Desert Research,2010,30(6):1311-1318.
[10]Zheng Y P,Zhao J C,Zhang B C,Li L,Zhang Y M.Advances on Ecological Studies of Algae and mosses in Biological Soil Crust.Chinese Bulletin of Botany,2009,44(3):371-378.
[11]Chen C Y,Li X R,Zhao X.Photosynthetic properties of two crust mosses during dehydration.Chinese Journal of Ecology,2012,31(12):3064-3069.
[12]Minibayeva F,Beckett R P.High rates of extracellular superoxide production in bryophytes and lichens,and an oxidative burst in response to rehydration following desiccation.New Phytologist,2001,152(2):333-341.
[13]Li Y J,Li J,Chen J,Huang G W.Response of Dolichomitriopsis diversiformis photosynthesis to light,air temperature and plant water content.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2004,15(3):391-395.
[14]Chen G X,LI J,Chen J,Zhu J Y,Chen J R,Liu Y D.A preliminary study on the community environment of Dolichmitriopsis diversiformis(Mitt)Nog.In Mt.Fanjing,Guizhou,China.Guizhou Science,2001,19(4):81-84.
[15]Chen J,Liu B,Li J,Jiang D S.Relationship between the distribution and the environmental factors in epiphytic moss Dolichomitriopsis diversiformis.Journal of Jishou University(Natural Sciences Edition),2006,27(5):85-88.
[16]Du X M,Li J,Tian X R,Li Z Y.Reactive Oxygen Species Metabolism and Lipid peroxidation of Polytrichum commune and Plagiomnium acutum during Fast Drying and rehydration.Acta Botanica Boreali-occidentalia Sinica,2012,32(11):2279-2285.
[17]Vertucci C W,Roos E.Theoretical basis of protocols for seed storage II.The influence of temperature on optimal moisture levels.Seed Science Research,1993,3(3):201-203.
[18]Du X M,Tian X R,Li J,Shi J X.Comparison on Alternation of Chlorophyll Fluoroscence Between Pplytrichum commune and Plagiomnium acutum During Dehydration and Rehydration.Life Science Research,2012,16(6):521-525.
[19]Bors W,Lengfelder E,Saran M.Oxidation of hydroxylamine to nitrite as an assay for the combined presence of superoxide anions and hydroxyl radicals.Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications,1977,75(4):973-979.
[20]Patterson B D,Macrae E A,Ferguson I B.Estimation of hydrogen peroxide in plant extracts using titanium(IV).Analytical Biochemistry,1984,139(2):487-492.
[21]Jiang M Y,Zhang J H.Effect of abscisic acid on active oxygen species,antioxidative defence system and oxidative damage in leaves of maize seedlings.Plant Cell Physiology,2001,42(11):1265-1273.
[22]Donahue J L,Okpodu M C,Cramer C L,Grabau E A,Alscher R G..Responses of antioxidants to paraquat in pea leaves(Relationships to resistance).Plant Physiology,1997,113(1):249-257.
[23]Mishra N P,Mishra R K,Singhal G S.Changes in the activities of anti-oxidant enzymes during exposure of intact wheat leaves to strong visible light at different temperatures in the presence of protein synthesis inhibitors.Plant Physiology,1993,102(3):903-910.
[24]Bradford M M.A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of proteindye binding.Analytical Biochemistry,1976,72(1/2):248-254.
[25]Oldenhof H,Wolkers W F,Bowman J L,Tablin F,Crowe J H.Freezing and desiccation tolerance in the moss Physcomitrella patens:An in situ fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta,2006,1760(8):1226-1234.
[26]Genty B,Briantais J M,Baker N R.The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta,1989,990(1):87-92.
[27]Fu W G,Li P P,Wu Y Y.Effects of different light intensities on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and yield in lettuce.Scientia Horticulturae,2012,135:45-51.
[28]Lichtenthaler H K,MiehéJ A.Fluorescence imaging as a diagnostic tool for plant stress.Trends in Plant Science,1997,2(8):316-320.
[29]Oliver M J,Cushman J C,Koster K L.Dehydration tolerance in plants.Methods in Molecular Biology,2010,639:3-24.
[30]Misra A N,Srivastava A,Strasser R J.Utilization of fast chlorophyll a fluorescence technique in assessing the salt/ion sensitivity of mung bean and Brassica seedlings.Journal of Plant Physiology,2001,158(9):1173-1181.
[31]Dugald C D,Beadle C L.Xanthophyll-cycle dynamics and rapid induction of anthocyanin synthesis in Eucalyptus nitens seedlings transferred to photoinhibitory conditions.Journal of Plant Physiology,2005,162(1):37-46.
[32]Zhao L Y,Deng X P,Shan L.The Response Mechanism of Active Oxygen Species System to Droght Stress.Acta Botanica Borealioccidentalia Sinica,2005,25(2):413-418.
[34]Fu S L,Zhou Y B,He X Y,Chen W.Effects of drought stress on photosythesis physiology of Populus pseudo-sinonii.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2006,17(11):2016-2019.
[33]Pompelli M F,Barata-Luís R,Vitorino H S,Gonalves E R,Rolim E V,Santos M G,Almeida-Cortez J S,Ferreira V M,Lemos E E,Endres L.Photosynthesis,photoprotection and antioxidant activity of purging nut under drought deficit and recovery.Biomass and Bioenergy,2010,34(8):1207-1215.
[35]Charron A J,Quatrano R S.Between a Rock and a dry place:the water-stressed moss.Molecular Plant,2009,2(3):478-486.
[36]Xu Z F,Luo G H,Wang A G.Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis and the Metabolism of Active Oxygen in Photosynthetic Organs.Plant Physiology Journal,1999,35(4):325-331.
[37]Pospíil P.Molecular mechanisms of production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species by photosystem II.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta,2012,1817(1):218-231.
