摘要
With marker and phenotype information from observed populations, genomic selection(GS) can be used to establish associations between markers and phenotypes. It aims to use genome-wide markers to estimate the effects of all loci and thereby predict the genetic values of untested populations, so as to achieve more comprehensive and reliable selection and to accelerate genetic progress in crop breeding. GS models usually face the problem that the number of markers is much higher than the number of phenotypic observations.To overcome this issue and improve prediction accuracy, many models and algorithms,including GBLUP, Bayes, and machine learning have been employed for GS. As hot issues in GS research, the estimation of non-additive genetic effects and the combined analysis of multiple traits or multiple environments are also important for improving the accuracy of prediction. In recent years, crop breeding has taken advantage of the development of GS.The principles and characteristics of current popular GS methods and research progress in these methods for crop improvement are reviewed in this paper.
With marker and phenotype information from observed populations, genomic selection(GS) can be used to establish associations between markers and phenotypes. It aims to use genome-wide markers to estimate the effects of all loci and thereby predict the genetic values of untested populations, so as to achieve more comprehensive and reliable selection and to accelerate genetic progress in crop breeding. GS models usually face the problem that the number of markers is much higher than the number of phenotypic observations.To overcome this issue and improve prediction accuracy, many models and algorithms,including GBLUP, Bayes, and machine learning have been employed for GS. As hot issues in GS research, the estimation of non-additive genetic effects and the combined analysis of multiple traits or multiple environments are also important for improving the accuracy of prediction. In recent years, crop breeding has taken advantage of the development of GS.The principles and characteristics of current popular GS methods and research progress in these methods for crop improvement are reviewed in this paper.
引文
[1]L.N.Hazel,J.L.Lush,The efficiency of three methods of selection,J.Hered.33(1942)393–399.
[2]C.R.Henderson,Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model,Biometrics 31(1975)423–447.
[3]R.Lande,R.Thompson,Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits,Genetics 124(1990)743–756.
[4]C.Riedelsheimer,A.Czedik-Eysenberg,C.Grieder,J.Lisec,F.Technow,R.Sulpice,T.Altmann,M.Stitt,L.Willmitzer,A.E.Melchinger,Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize,Nat.Genet.44(2012)217–220.
[5]M.Goddard,Genomic selection:prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response,Genetica 136(2009)245–257.
[6]L.Chen,C.Li,M.Sargolzaei,F.Schenkel,Impact of genotype imputation on the performance of GBLUP and Bayesian methods for genomic prediction,PLo S One 9(2014),e101544.
[7]Z.Zhang,M.Erbe,J.He,U.Ober,N.Gao,H.Zhang,H.Simianer,J.Li,Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance-covariance matrix,G3-Genes Genomes Genet.5(2015)615–627.
[8]E.L.Heffner,A.J.Lorenz,J.L.Jannink,M.E.Sorrells,Plant breeding with genomic selection:gain per unit time and cost,Crop Sci.50(2010)1681–1690.
[9]R.Bernardo,J.Yu,Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize,Crop Sci.47(2007)1082–1090.
[10]T.Albrecht,V.Wimmer,H.Auinger,M.Erbe,C.Knaak,M.Ouzunova,H.Simianer,C.C.Sch?n,Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize,Theor.Appl.Genet.123(2011)339–350.
[11]D.C.Kadam,S.M.Potts,M.O.Bohn,A.E.Lipka,A.J.Lorenz,Genomic prediction of single crosses in the early stages of a maize hybrid breeding pipeline,G3-Genes Genomes Genet.6(2016)3443–3453.
[12]U.Beukert,Z.Li,G.Liu,Y.Zhao,N.Ramachandra,V.Mirdita,F.Pita,K.Pillen,J.C.Reif,Genome-based identification of heterotic patterns in rice,Rice 10(2017)22.
[13]S.Z.Xu,D.Zhu,Q.F.Zhang,Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction,Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.111(2014)12456–12461.
[14]H.D.Daetwyler,U.K.Bansal,H.S.Bariana,M.J.Hayden,B.J.Hayes,Genomic prediction for rust resistance in diverse wheat landraces,Theor.Appl.Genet.127(2014)1795–1803.
[15]X.Wang,L.Z.Li,Z.F.Yang,X.F.Zheng,B.Yu,C.W.Xu,Z.L.Hu,Predicting rice hybrid performance using univariate and multivariate GBLUP models based on North Carolina mating design II,Heredity 118(2017)302–310.
[16]J.Y.Li,J.Wang,R.S.Zeigler,The 3,000 rice genomes project:new opportunities and challenges for future rice research,Gigascience 3(2014)8.
[17]H.H.Neves,R.Carvalheiro,S.A.Queiroz,A comparison of statistical methods for genomic selection in a mice population,BMC Genet.13(2012)100.
[18]T.H.Meuwissen,B.J.Hayes,M.E.Goddard,Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps,Genetics 157(2001)1819–1829.
[19]S.Z.Xu,Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome,Genetics 163(2003)789–801.
[20]R.Tibshirani,Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso,J.R.Stat.Soc.B(1996)267–288.
[21]T.Park,G.Casella,The bayesian lasso,J.Am.Stat.Assoc.103(2008)681–686.
[22]J.Friedman,T.Hastie,R.Tibshirani,Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent,J.Stat.Softw.33(2010)1–22.
[23]X.Wang,Z.F.Yang,C.W.Xu,A comparison of genomic selection methods for breeding value prediction,Sci.Bull.60(2015)925–935.
[24]P.Van Raden,Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions,J.Dairy Sci.91(2008)4414–4423.
[25]B.J.Hayes,P.M.Visscher,M.E.Goddard,Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix,Genet.Res.91(2009)47–60.
[26]D.Habier,J.Tetens,F.-R.Seefried,P.Lichtner,G.Thaller,The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle,Genet.Sel.Evol.42(2010)5.
[27]J.Yang,B.Benyamin,B.P.Mc Evoy,S.Gordon,A.K.Henders,D.R.Nyholt,P.A.Madden,A.C.Heath,N.G.Martin,G.W.Montgomery,Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height,Nat.Genet.42(2010)565–569.
[28]M.E.Goddard,B.J.Hayes,T.H.E.Meuwissen,Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection,J.Anim.Breed.Genet.128(2011)409–421.
[29]O.F.Christensen,P.Madsen,B.Nielsen,T.Ostersen,G.Su,Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs,Animal 6(2012)1565–1571.
[30]A.Legarra,I.Aguilar,I.Misztal,A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information,J.Dairy Sci.92(2009)4656–4663.
[31]S.Maenhout,B.De Baets,G.Haesaert,E.van Bockstaele,Support vector machine regression for the prediction of maize hybrid performance,Theor.Appl.Genet.115(2007)1003–1013.
[32]N.Heslot,H.P.Yang,M.E.Sorrells,J.L.Jannink,Genomic selection in plant breeding:a comparison of models,Crop Sci.52(2012)146–160.
[33]J.Crossa,P.Perez-Rodriguez,J.Cuevas,O.Montesinos-Lopez,D.Jarquin,G.de los Campos,J.Burgueno,J.M.GonzalezCamacho,S.Perez-Elizalde,Y.Beyene,S.Dreisigacker,R.Singh,X.C.Zhang,M.Gowda,M.Roorkiwal,J.Rutkoski,R.K.Varshney,Genomic selection in plant breeding:methods,models,and perspectives,Trends Plant Sci.22(2017)961–975.
[34]D.Habier,R.Fernando,J.Dekkers,The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values,Genetics 177(2007)2389–2397.
[35]H.Gao,G.Su,L.Janss,Y.Zhang,M.S.Lund,Model comparison on genomic predictions using high-density markers for different groups of bulls in the Nordic Holstein population,J.Dairy Sci.96(2013)4678–4687.
[36]X.Wu,M.S.Lund,D.Sun,Q.Zhang,G.Su,Impact of relationships between test and training animals and among training animals on reliability of genomic prediction,J.Anim.Breed.Genet.132(2015)366–375.
[37]H.H.R.Neves,R.Carvalheiro,A.M.Perez,Y.T.O'Brien,A.S.Utsunomiya,F.S.do Carmo,J.Schenkel,J.C.Soelkner,C.P.Mc Ewan,J.B.Van Tassell,M.V.G.B.da Cole,S.A.Silva,T.S.Queiroz,J.F.Garcia Sonstegard,Accuracy of genomic predictions in Bos indicus(Nellore)cattle,Genet.Sel.Evol.46(2014)17.
[38]Y.Xu,C.W.Xu,S.Z.Xu,Prediction and association mapping of agronomic traits in maize using multiple omic data,Heredity 119(2017)174–184.
[39]P.Perez-Rodriguez,D.Gianola,J.M.Gonzalez-Camacho,J.Crossa,Y.Manes,S.Dreisigacker,Comparison between linear and nonparametric regression models for genome-enabled prediction in wheat,G3-Genes Genomes Genet.2(2012)1595–1605.
[40]M.Roorkiwal,A.Rathore,R.R.Das,M.K.Singh,A.Jain,S.Srinivasan,P.M.Gaur,B.Chellapilla,S.Tripathi,Y.Li,Genome-enabled prediction models for yield related traits in chickpea,Front.Plant Sci.7(2016)1666.
[41]O.Gonzalez-Recio,G.J.M.Rosa,D.Gianola,Machine learning methods and predictive ability metrics for genome-wide prediction of complex traits,Livest.Sci.166(2014)217–231.
[42]D.Wang,I.S.El-Basyoni,P.S.Baenziger,J.Crossa,K.M.Eskridge,I.Dweikat,Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits with epistatic effects in plant breeding populations,Heredity 109(2012)313–319.
[43]I.Misztal,T.J.Lawlor,R.L.Fernando,Dominance models with method R for stature of Holsteins,J.Dairy Sci.80(1997)975–978.
[44]M.Denis,J.M.Bouvet,Efficiency of genomic selection with models including dominance effect in the context of eucalyptus breeding,Tree Genet.Genomes 9(2013)37–51.
[45]R.Wellmann,J.Bennewitz,Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits,Genet.Res.94(2012)21–37.
[46]M.Balestre,R.G.Von Pinho,J.C.Souza,Prediction of maize single-cross performance by mixed linear models with microsatellite marker information,Genet.Mol.Res.9(2010)1054–1068.
[47]N.Uwatoko,A.Onishi,Y.Ikeda,M.Kontani,A.Sasaki,K.Matsubara,Y.Itoh,Y.Sano,Epistasis among the three major flowering time genes in rice:coordinate changes of photoperiod sensitivity,basic vegetative growth and optimum photoperiod,Euphytica 163(2008)167–175.
[48]D.Mao,T.Liu,C.Xu,X.Li,Y.Xing,Epistasis and complementary gene action adequately account for the genetic bases of transgressive segregation of kilo-grain weight in rice,Euphytica 180(2011)261–271.
[49]J.W.Dudley,G.R.Johnson,Epistatic models improve prediction of performance in corn,Crop Sci.49(2009)1533.
[50]T.Würschum,H.P.Maurer,F.Dreyer,J.C.Reif,Effect of interand intragenic epistasis on the heritability of oil content in rapeseed(Brassica napus L.),Theor.Appl.Genet.126(2013)435–441.
[51]Z.Hu,Y.Li,X.Song,Y.Han,X.Cai,S.Xu,W.Li,Genomic value prediction for quantitative traits under the epistatic model,BMC Genet.12(2011)15.
[52]Y.Jia,J.L.Jannink,Multiple-trait genomic selection methods increase genetic value prediction accuracy,Genetics 192(2012)1513–1522.
[53]M.Lopez-Cruz,J.Crossa,D.Bonnett,S.Dreisigacker,J.Poland,J.L.Jannink,R.P.Singh,E.Autrique,G.de los Campos,Increased prediction accuracy in wheat breeding trials using a marker×environment interaction genomic selection model,G3-Genes Genomes Genet.5(2015)569–582.
[54]A.W.Schulthess,Y.Wang,T.Miedaner,P.Wilde,J.C.Reif,Y.Zhao,Multiple-trait and selection indices-genomic predictions for grain yield and protein content in rye for feeding purposes,Theor.Appl.Genet.129(2016)273–287.
[55]Z.Guo,D.M.Tucker,D.Wang,C.J.Basten,E.Ersoz,W.H.Briggs,J.Lu,M.Li,G.Gay,Accuracy of across-environment genome-wide prediction in maize nested association mapping populations,G3-Genes Genomes Genet.3(2013)263–272.
[56]M.Scutari,P.Howell,D.J.Balding,I.Mackay,Multiple quantitative trait analysis using Bayesian networks,Genetics198(2014)129–137.
[57]C.Henderson,R.Quaas,Multiple trait evaluation using relatives'records,J.Anim.Sci.43(1976)1188–1197.
[58]T.Hayashi,H.Iwata,A Bayesian method and its variational approximation for prediction of genomic breeding values in multiple traits,BMC Bioinf.14(2013)34.
[59]S.Tsuruta,I.Misztal,I.Aguilar,T.J.Lawlor,Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins,J.Dairy Sci.94(2011)4198–4204.
[60]G.Guo,F.Zhao,Y.Wang,Y.Zhang,L.Du,G.Su,Comparison of single-trait and multiple-trait genomic prediction models,BMC Genet.15(2014)30.
[61]Y.Bao,J.E.Kurle,G.Anderson,N.D.Young,Association mapping and genomic prediction for resistance to sudden death syndrome in early maturing soybean germplasm,Mol.Breed.35(2015)128.
[62]J.Burgue?o,G.de los Campos,K.Weigel,J.Crossa,Genomic prediction of breeding values when modeling genotype×environment interaction using pedigree and dense molecular markers,Crop Sci.52(2012)707–719.
[63]N.Heslot,D.Akdemir,M.E.Sorrells,J.L.Jannink,Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions,Theor.Appl.Genet.127(2014)463–480.
[64]J.Cuevas,J.Crossa,O.A.Montesinos-Lopez,J.Burgueno,P.Perez-Rodriguez,G.de los Campos,Bayesian genomic prediction with genotype×environment interaction kernel models,G3-Genes Genomes Genet.7(2017)41–53.
[65]O.Kempthorne,A.W.Nordskog,Restricted selection indices,Biometrics 15(1959)10–19.
[66]J.J.Cerón-Rojas,J.Crossa,F.H.Toledo,J.Sahagún-Castellanos,A predetermined proportional gains eigen selection index method,Crop Sci.56(2016)2436–2447.
[67]J.Elgin,R.Hill,K.Zeiders,Comparison of four methods of multiple trait selection for five traits in alfalfa,Crop Sci.10(1970)190–193.
[68]D.J.Dolan,D.D.Stuthman,F.L.Kolb,A.D.Hewings,Multiple trait selection in a recurrent selection population in oat(Avena sativa L.),Crop Sci.36(1996)1207–1211.
[69]K.Suwantaradon,S.Eberhart,J.Mock,J.Owens,W.Guthrie,Index selection for several agronomic traits in the BSSS2maize population,Crop Sci.15(1975)827–833.
[70]C.C.Holbrook,J.W.Burton,T.E.Carter,Evaluation of recurrent restricted index selection for increasing yield while holding seed protein constant in soybean,Crop Sci.29(1989)324–329.
[71]J.C.M.Dekkers,Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory,J.Anim.Breed.Genet.124(2007)331–341.
[72]J.J.Cerón-Rojas,J.Crossa,V.N.Arief,K.Basford,J.Rutkoski,D.Jarquin,G.Alvarado,Y.Beyene,K.Semagn,I.De Lacy,A genomic selection index applied to simulated and real data,G3-Genes Genomes Genet.5(2015)2155–2164.
[73]D.H.Lyra,L.de Freitas Mendon?a,G.Galli,F.C.Alves,í.S.C.Granato,R.Fritsche-Neto,Multi-trait genomic prediction for nitrogen response indices in tropical maize hybrids,Mol.Breed.37(2017)80.
[74]H.M.Nielsen,A.K.Sonesson,H.Yazdi,T.H.E.Meuwissen,Comparison of accuracy of genome-wide and BLUP breeding value estimates in sib based aquaculture breeding schemes,Aquaculture 289(2009)259–264.
[75]S.A.Clark,J.M.Hickey,H.D.Daetwyler,J.H.J.van der Werf,The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes,Genet.Sel.Evol.44(2012)4.
[76]G.Su,R.F.Brondum,P.Ma,B.Guldbrandtsen,G.R.Aamand,M.S.Lund,Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density(similar to 54,000)and high-density(similar to 777,000)single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations,J.Dairy Sci.95(2012)4657–4665.
[77]E.L.Heffner,J.L.Jannink,H.Iwata,E.Souza,M.E.Sorrells,Genomic selection accuracy for grain quality traits in biparental wheat populations,Crop Sci.51(2011)2597.
[78]M.P.L.Calus,T.H.E.Meuwissen,A.P.W.de Roos,R.F.Veerkamp,Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes,Genetics 178(2008)553–561.
[79]T.M.Villumsen,L.Janss,M.S.Lund,The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle,J.Anim.Breed.Genet.126(2009)3–13.
[80]S.Q.Zhong,J.C.M.Dekkers,R.L.Fernando,J.L.Jannink,Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines:a barley case study,Genetics 182(2009)355–364.
[81]J.L.Jannink,A.J.Lorenz,H.Iwata,Genomic selection in plant breeding:from theory to practice,Brief.Funct.Genomics 9(2010)166–177.
[82]N.A.Alimi,M.C.A.M.Bink,J.A.Dieleman,J.J.Magán,A.M.Wubs,A.Palloix,F.A.V.Eeuwijk,Multi-trait and multi-environment QTL analyses of yield and a set of physiological traits in pepper,Theor.Appl.Genet.126(2013)2597–2625.
[83]T.Gartner,M.Steinfath,S.Andorf,J.Lisec,R.C.Meyer,T.Altmann,L.Willmitzer,J.Selbig,Improved heterosis prediction by combining information on DNA-and metabolic markers,PLo S One 4(2009),e5220.
