摘要
目的比较细胞松弛素A(Cyto A)及细胞松弛素B(Cyto B)对微核试验常用细胞系——中国仓鼠肺成纤维细胞(CHL)毒性及对体外微核试验结果的影响。方法在荧光显微镜下观察由微丝组成的应力纤维结构,并使用CHL开展胞质分裂阻断法微核试验,比较两者对多核细胞率及含微核双核细胞率的影响。结果不同浓度的Cyto A和Cyto B与细胞作用24 h后,与对照组(26%±7%)比较均可诱导多核细胞形成率的显著升高(Cyto A及Cyto B 3.0μg/ml浓度组分别为58%±12%和72%±9%,P <0.001),且Cyto A在3.0μg/ml浓度条件下诱导的平均多核细胞率与1.5μg/ml浓度组比较有所降低。Cyto A处理组在MMC浓度分别为0、0.1和0.3μg/ml时的微核率分别为0.25%±0.16%、 1.98%±0.59%和3.80%±0.90%;而Cyto B处理组在相同MMC浓度时的微核率分别为0.32%±0.16%、2.50%±0.61%和5.05%±1.09%。结论虽然Cyto B的多核细胞造模效果略优于Cyto A,两者均可有效用于胞质分裂阻断法微核研究。研究结果将为相关领域研究者提供可借鉴的实际经验。
Objective To compare the cytotoxicity and the effects of cytochalasin A(Cyto A) and cytochalasin B(Cyto B) on the results of in vitro micronucleus test on Chinese hamster lung(CHL) cells frequently used in micronucleus test.Methods The stress fiber structures formed by actin microfilaments were observed under fluorescence microscope, and the cytokinesis-blocking micronucleus test was performed to compare the multinuclear cell rate and micronucleus rate induced by Cyto A and Cyto B.Results The cells were treated with different concentrations of Cyto A and Cyto B for 24 hours, and both treatment could significantly increase the multinuclear cell rate. For Cyto A and Cyto B treatment at 3.0 μg/ml, the multinuclear cell rate was 58% ±12% and 72% ± 9%, respectively, compared with the control of 26% ± 7%(P < 0.001). The multinuclear cell rate induced by Cyto A at 3.0 μg/ml was lower than that at 1.5 μg/ml. The micronucleus ratio of cells in Cyto A treatment group along with different concentration of MMC(0, 0.1 and 0.3 μg/ml) were 0.25% ± 0.16%, 1.98% ± 0.59% and 3.80% ± 0.90%, respectively; while the micronucleus ratio under similar conditions after Cyto B treatment was 0.32% ± 0.16%, 2.50% ± 0.61% and 5.05% ± 1.09%,respectively.Conclusion Although Cyto B showed slight better effects on establishing the multinucleated cell model, both Cyto A and Cyto B could be effectively used in the cytokinesis-blocking micronucleus test.
引文
[1]El-Zein R,Vral A,Etzel CJ.Cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay and cancer risk assessment.Mutagenesis,2011,26(1):101-106.
[2]Katic J,Cemeli E,Baumgartner A,et al.Evaluation of the genotoxicity of 10 selected dietary/environmental compounds with the in vitro micronucleus cytokinesis-block assay in an interlaboratory comparison.Food Chem Toxicol,2010,48(10):2612-2623.
[3]Fenech M.The cytokinesis-block micronucleus technique:a detailed description of the method and its application to genotoxicity studies in human populations.Mutat Res,1993,101(285):35-44.
[4]Fenech M,Morley A.Solutions to the kinetic problem in the micronucleus assay.Cytobios,1985,43(172-173):233-246.
[5]Cooper JA.Effects of cytochalasin and phalloidin on actin.J Cell Biol,1987,105(4):1473-1478.
[6]Armbruster BL,Wunderli H,Turner BM,et al.Immunocytochemical localization of cytoskeletal proteins and histone 2B in isolated membrane-depleted nuclei,metaphase chromatin,and whole Chinese hamster ovary cells.J Histochem Cytochem,1983,31(12):1385-1393.
[7]Díaz-Ricart M,Arderiu G,Estebanell E,et al.Inhibition of cytoskeletal assembly by cytochalasin B prevents signaling through tyrosine phosphorylation and secretion triggered by collagen but not by thrombin.Am J Pathol,2002,160(1):329-337.
[8]Poste G.Enucleation of mammalian cells by cytochalasin B.I.Characterization of anucleate cells.Exp Cell Res,1972,73(2):273-286.
[9]The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Test no.487:in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test//OCOD guidelines for the testing of chemicals--section 4:health effects.(2014-09-26)[2018-12-12].https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-487-in-vitro-mammalian-cell-micronucleus-test_9789264224438-en.
[10]Wen HR,Dan M,Qi NS,et al.Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytomic test establishment in multiple mammalian cell lines.Carcinogenesis Teratogenesis Mutagenesis,2015,27(4):304-308.(in Chinese)文海若,淡墨,齐乃松,等.多细胞系胞质分裂阻滞微核细胞组学试验法的建立与应用.癌变·畸变·突变,2015,27(4):304-308.
[11]LüLL,Liu TT,Shen CL,et al.In vitro characteristics of micronucleus cytomic effect of the two CdSeS/ZnS-COOH alloyed quantum dots.Carcinogenesis Teratogenesis Mutagenesis,2015,27(3):187-190,196.(in Chinese)吕路路,刘甜甜,沈春琳,等.两种荧光波长CdSeS/ZnS-COOH合金量子点微核组学效应特征的比较研究.癌变·畸变·突变,2015,27(3):187-190,196.
[12]Cao YY,Xi J,Tang WF,et al.Genotoxicity evaluation of triclosan in vitro.Carcinogenesis Teratogenesis Mutagenesis,2018,30(1):71-75.(in Chinese)曹易懿,奚晶,唐伟锋,等.三氯生的体外遗传毒性评价.癌变·畸变·突变,2018,30(1):71-75.
[13]Marzook NB,Newsome TP.Viruses that exploit actin-based motility for their replication and spread.Handb Exp Pharmacol,2017,235:237-261.
[14]Etienne-Manneville S.Cytoplasmic intermediate filaments in cell biology.Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,2018,34:1-28.
[15]Luzhna L,Kathiria P,Kovalchuk O.Micronuclei in genotoxicity assessment:from genetics to epigenetics and beyond.Front Genet,2013,4:131.
[16]Surrallés J,Natarajan AT.Human lymphocytes micronucleus assay in Europe.An international survey.Mutat Res,1997,392(1-2):165-174.
[17]von der Hude W,Kalweit S,Engelhardt G,et al.In vitro micronucleus assay with Chinese hamster V79 cells-results of a collaborative study with in situ exposure to 26 chemical substances.Mutat Res,2000,468(2):137-163.
[18]Zhao H.Preliminary study on nuclear bridge as a biomarker of radiation.Beijing:Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,2014.(in Chinese)赵骅.核质桥作为辐射生物标志物的初步研究.北京:中国疾病预防控制中心,2014.
[19]The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.OECD environment,health and safety publications series on the safety of manufactured nanomaterials No.43--Genotoxicity of manufactured nanomaterials:report of the OECD expert meeting.(2014-12-03)[2018-12-12].http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2014)34&doclanguag e=en.
[20]Wen HR,Shao AL,Chen L,et al.Selection of appropriate genotoxicity testing methods for nanomaterialsl.Carcinogenesis Teratogenesis Mutagenesis,2018,30(4):326-331.(in Chinese)文海若,邵安良,陈亮,等.适合纳米材料遗传毒性评价方法的选择.癌变·畸变·突变,2018,30(4):326-331.
[21]Kalweit S,Utesch D,von der Hude W,et al.Chemically induced micronucleus formation in V79 cells--comparison of three different test approaches.Mutat Res,1999,439(2):183-190.
