心肌梗死急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后患者心理弹性水平及其影响因素
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Psychological Resilience in Patients Received Emergency PCI after Myocardial Infarction and Its Influencing Factors
  • 作者:邱孝丰 ; 胡鑫 ; 王兴萍 ; 褚倩 ; 王玉玲
  • 英文作者:QIU Xiaofeng;HU Xin;WANG Xingping;CHU Qian;WANG Yuling;Department of Cardiology,Second Medical Center,PLA General Hospital;CCU,First Medical Center,PLA General Hospital;Health Care Department,Hainan Branch of PLA General Hospital;Nursing Department,PLA General Hospital;
  • 关键词:心肌梗死 ; 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后 ; 心理弹性 ; 社会支持 ; 一般自我效能感
  • 英文关键词:myocardial infarction;;post PCI;;psychological resilience;;social support;;self-efficacy
  • 中文刊名:JFHL
  • 英文刊名:Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
  • 机构:解放军总医院第二医学中心心血管内科;解放军总医院第一医学中心心血管内科监护室;解放军总医院海南分院保健科;解放军总医院护理部;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-15
  • 出版单位:解放军护理杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36;No.391
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JFHL201901013
  • 页数:4
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:31-1825/R
  • 分类号:49-52
摘要
目的调查心肌梗死急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)术后患者心理弹性水平并分析其影响因素。方法便利抽样选取2018年2-6月在北京市某三甲医院诊断为心肌梗死并经由急诊行PCI术后送入心内科监护室的患者88例,采用中文版心理弹性量表(Connor-Davidson resilience scale,CD-RISC)、社会支持评定量表、一般效能感量表和一般情况问卷对其进行调查。结果心肌梗死急诊PCI术后患者CD-RISC总得分为(68.10±17.89)分,坚韧维度得分(34.27±9.96)分,力量维度得分(23.58±5.61)分,乐观维度得分(10.16±3.36)分;社会支持得分为(42.36±6.79)分;一般自我效能感得分为(28.41±7.79)分;文化程度、社会支持与一般自我效能感对心理弹性产生影响(均P<0.05)。结论心肌梗死急诊PCI术后患者心理弹性处于较低水平,文化程度、社会支持与一般自我效能感对心理弹性具有保护作用。
        Objective To investigate the level of psychological resilience in patients who received emergency PCI after myocardial infarction(MI)and to explore its influencing factors.Methods By convenience sampling method,88 patients who received emergency PCI in a third-class hospital from February to June2018 were selected and measured by the Connor-Davidson resilience scale(CD-RISC),social support revalued scale(SSRS),general self-efficacy scale(GSES),and a general questionnaire.Results The total score of CD-RISC was(68.10±17.89),and the mean score for toughness dimension was(34.27±9.96),strength dimension was(23.58±5.61)and optimism dimension was(10.16±3.36).The score of SSRS was(42.36±6.79)and the score of GSES was(28.41±7.79).Education,social support and self-efficacy affected patients' psychological resilience(all P<0.05).Conclusions The psychological resilience of patients received emergency PCI after myocardial infarction is at a lower level.Education,social support and self-efficacy contributes a positive effect on psychological resilience.
引文
[1]Global health estimates 2015:20leading causes of death,2000and 2015[R].[2017-10-18].http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/index1.html
    [2]杨燕飞,张敏,郭涛.慢性压力对冠心病发生、进展及预后的影响[J].心血管病学进展,2013,34(02):238-240.
    [3]王立丽.肺癌化疗患者心理弹性和应对方式对生存质量的影响研究[J].护士进修杂志,2017,32(24):2227-2229,2267.
    [4]YU X,ZHANG J.Factor analysis and psychometric evaluation of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale(CD-RISC)in Chinese people[J].Soc Behav Person,2007,35(1):19-30.
    [5]肖水源.《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用[J].临床精神医学杂志,1994,4(2):98-100.
    [6]刘继文,李富业,连玉龙.社会支持评定量表的信度效度研究[J].新疆医科大学学报,2008,31(1):1-3.
    [7]王才康,胡中锋,刘勇.一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究[J].应用心理学,2001,7(1):37-40.
    [8]ANCHIQUE SANTOS C V,LOPEZ-JIMENEZ F,BENAIM B,et al.Cardiac rehabilitation in Latin America[J].Prog Cardiovasc Dis,2014,57(3):268-275.
    [9]来彩芬,朱晨曦.社区老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者心理弹性及影响因素分析[J].中国公共卫生管理,2014,30(03):464-466.
    [10]董英,辛霞,高菊林,等.血液透析患者心理弹性和心理健康的相关性研究[J].护理实践与研究,2018,15(3):139-141.
    [11]安云飞,曹仲茹,刘娟,等.乳腺癌化疗患者自我效能、社会支持及应对方式对心理弹性影响的路径分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2018,24(3):288-292.
    [12]宋静,郭楠,吴丽红.首发脑卒中患者心理弹性状况与医学应对的相关性及影响因素[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2018,26(07):999-1002.
    [13]赵雯雯,郑珊红,张爱华.癌症患者心理弹性水平及其影响因素研究[J].护理学杂志,2015,30(3):22-25.
    [14]田荣辉,蒋维连,胡洁.应用书写表达积极情绪提高护士主观幸福感和自我效能感的效果[J].护理管理杂志,2015,15(11):829-830.
    [15]叶婷婷,李悦,刘旻.应用情绪管理提高护士主观幸福感和自我效能感的实践与体会[J].护理管理杂志,2012,12(05):374-376.
    [16]童瑛,陆丽青.暗示技术在提高自我效能感中的运用[J].现代教育科学,2005(10):28-30.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.