摘要
目的:研究扩展Barthel指数(EBI)评定脑卒中患者的重测信度及评测者间信度。方法:由第1位评定者应用EBI量表对30例脑卒中患者进行评定,3d内再次对该患者进行评定;第2位评定者在第1位评定者初次评定后2 d内再次对该患者进行评定。对不同评定者间的EBI结果进行等级间相关系数(ICC)分析以检验EBI的重测信度和评定者间信度。结果:第1位评定者两次评定总分的组内相关系数为0. 99(P <0. 01);第1位评定者与第2位评定者评定总分的组内相关系数为0. 98(P <0. 01)。结论:EBI量表应用于脑卒中患者康复评定时具有良好的重测信度及评测者间信度。
Objective: To study the test-retest reliability and interrater reliability of the extended Barthel index( EBI)in evaluation of Chinese stroke patients. Methods: All the stroke patients were assessed with an extended Barthel index scale by one evaluator,and the patients were evaluated again within 3 days after the assessment. The other one evaluator evaluated the patient within 2 days after the first assessment. The interlevel correlation coefficient( ICC) analysis of the EBI results among different evaluators was used to examine test-retest reliability of EBI and the interrater reliability. Results:The interlevel correlation coefficient of total score of the first evaluator in two times assessment was 0. 99( P < 0. 01); The interlevel correlation coefficient of the total score of first evaluator and second evaluator was 0. 98( P < 0. 01). Conclusions: The EBI scale has good test-retest reliability and interrater reliability evaluation for rehabilitation assessment of stroke patients.
引文
[1] Shah S,Vanclay F. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthe I Index for stroke rehabilitation[J]. Clin Epidemiol,1989,42(8):703-709.
[2] Mahoney FI,Barthel DW. Functional evaluation:The Barthel index[J]. Md State Med,1965,14(1):61-63.
[3] Wade DT,Collin C. The Barthel ADL index:a standard measure of physical disability[J]? Int Disabil Stud,1988,10(2):64-67.
[4] Kelly-Hayes M,Robertson JT,Broderick JP,et al. The American heart association stroke outcome classification:executive summary[J]. Stroke,1998,97(24):1274-80.
[5] Dombovy M. Rehabilitation and the course of recovery after stroke. In:Whisnant JP,ed. Stroke:populations,cohorts,and clinical trials[M]. Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann,1993(2):218-237.
[6] Prosiegel M,Pulsone G. Assessment of disability and hand-icap. In:Ketealaer P,Prosiegel M. A problem-oriented approach to multiple sclerosis[J]. Leuven,The Netherlands:Acco,1997(1):21-34.
[7] Prosiegel M,Bottger S,Schenk T. Der Erwertiertr Barthel Index(EBI)-eine neue Skala zur Erfassung von Fahigkeitsstorungen bei neurologischen patieneten[J]. Neurol Rehabil,1996(1):7-13.
[8] Marolf MV,Vaney C,Prosiegel M. Evaluation of disability in multiple sclerosis patients:a comparative study of the functional independence measure,the extended Barthel index and the expanded disability status scale[J]. Clin Rehabil,1996,10:309-13.
[9] Diana B,Petitti,M.D.Association of a history of gallbladder disease with a reduced conentration of high density lipoprotein cholesterol[J]. New England Journal of Medcine,1981,304(23):1396-1398.
[10] Wallace D,Duncan PW,Lai SM.Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the Functional Independence Measure in strok:the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness[J].Clin Epidemiol,2002,12,55(9):922-928.
[11]贾建军,中国认知障碍患者照料管理专家共识[J].中华老年医学杂志,2016,10(35):1051.
[12] Houlden H,Edwards M.Mc Neil J.et a1.Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury[J]. Clin Rehabil,2006,20(2):153-159.
[13] Jansa J.An evaluation of the Extended Barthel Index with acute ischemic stroke patients[J]. Neurorehabilitation&Neural Repair,2004,18(1):37-41.
