摘要
目的探讨自制植骨通道辅助下经伤椎椎弓根植骨置钉手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析自2010-02—2016-09在自制植骨通道下经伤椎椎弓根植骨置钉治疗的39例胸腰椎骨折。比较术前、术后3 d、末次随访时伤椎椎体前缘高度、伤椎Cobb角。结果 39例均获得随访,随访时间平均15.9(11～27)个月。随访期间未出现感染、骨折不愈合等并发症,内固定物均未见松动、断裂。术后X线片及CT显示伤椎内植骨愈合良好。术后3 d伤椎椎体前缘高度较术前明显增加,伤椎Cobb角较术前明显减小,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。末次随访与术后3 d时伤椎椎体前缘高度、伤椎Cobb角比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论自制植骨通道下经伤椎椎弓根植骨、经伤椎短节段椎弓根钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折可取得良好的疗效,可有效恢复伤椎高度并维持远期后凸畸形矫正效果。
Objective To explore the clinical effect of transpedicular vertebral arch grafting and pedicle screws in injured vertebra under the assistance of self-made bone grafting channel for thoracolumbar vertebral fracture. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 39 cases of thoracolumbar fractures, which treated with transpedicular vertebral arch grafting and pedicle screws in injured vertebra under the assistance of self-made bone grafting channel from February 2010 to September 2016. The anterior margin height and Cobb angle of the injured vertebrae were compared before surgery, 3 d after surgery and at the last follow-up. Results All the 39 patients were followed up for 11 to 27 months, an average of 15.9 months. During the follow-up, there were no complications such as infection and fracture nonunion, and no loosening or fracture of the internal fixation. Postoperative X-ray and CT showed good healing of the injured vertebral bone graft. Three days after surgery, the anterior margin height of the injured vertebrae was significantly higher than that before surgery, and the Cobb angle of the injured vertebrae was significantly lower than that before surgery, with statistically significant differences(P <0.05). At the last follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the height of the anterior vertebral body and the Cobb angle of the injured vertebrae between the two groups 3 days after surgery(P >0.05). Conclusion Transpedicular vertebral arch grafting and pedicle screws in injured vertebra under the assistance of self-made bone grafting channel for thoracolumbar vertebral fracture can achieve good clinical effect, which can effectively restore the height of the injured vertebrae and maintain the long-term correction effect of kyphosis.
引文
[1] Singh R,Rohilla RK,Kamboj K,et al. Outcome of pedicle screw fixation and monosegmental fusion in patients with fresh thoracolumbar fractures[J]. Asian Spine J,2014,8(3):298-308.
[2] Scheer JK,Bakhsheshian J,Fakurnejad S,et al. Evidence-based medicine of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures:a systematic review of operative management across 20 years[J]. Global Spine J,2015,5(1):73-82.
[3]李平,孙建民. Wiltse入路与后正中入路手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(3):272-274.
[4]沈昆,王守国,费昊东,等.伤椎置钉治疗单节段胸腰段椎体骨折的临床疗效[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(22):2106-2108.
[5]袁强,田伟,张贵林,等.骨折椎垂直应力螺钉在胸腰椎骨折中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(4):217-222.
[6]张骞,扈桂海,侯学全.经伤椎单侧固定和跨伤椎固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的疗效比较[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2016,19(1):39-42.
[7]王鹏,王静成,冯新民,等.胸腰椎骨折术后伤椎上终板骨缺损的生物力学有限元分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2017,27(7):72-79.
[8]刘璐萍,杨英.经皮短节段椎弓根钉经伤椎与跨伤椎内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(9):952-954.
[9]周全,周礼安.跨伤椎固定与经伤椎固定在胸腰椎骨折术中的应用效果比较[J].海南医学院学报,2014,20(9):1228-1230.
[10]罗狄鑫,金勋杰,徐汪洋,等.胸腰椎骨折患者经伤椎置钉与跨节段椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗的临床效果比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(14):1320-1323.
[11]吴剑飞,汪翔,汪鑫,等.肌间隙入路经伤椎椎弓根植骨跨伤椎固定治疗胸腰椎骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(14):1254-1257.
[12]胡海刚,谭伦,林旭,等.胸腰椎骨折复位术后椎体“空壳现象”的相关因素分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2017,27(3):242-247.
[13]安毅,李晶,刘兰泽,等.胸腰椎骨折经椎弓根椎体内植骨术后伤椎愈合情况的对比[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2015,30(5):460-463.
[14]钟泽莅,胡海刚,林旭,等.测量胸腰椎骨折复位后椎体“空壳”的体积[J].中国组织工程研究,2018,22(7):1038-1043.
[15] Tan CE,Fok MW,Luk KD,et al. Insertional torque and pullout strength of pedicle screws with or without repositioning:a porcine study[J]. J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong),2014,22(2):224-227.
