摘要
在社交媒体发展的过程中,网络用户的隐私问题引起了各界关注。社交媒体中的隐私问题主要表现为两个方面,其一为网民之间的隐私博弈,即随着社交网络中的陌生人越来越多,用户的隐私边界或将濒临失控,形成一种窥视与被窥视的拉锯战;其二表现为用户与技术之间的抗争,在大数据的"全景敞视"之下,技术让隐私无处可藏。此外,针对上述两个问题,笔者认为可以从个人节制以及国家规制两个层面进行治理。
With the development of social media, the privacy issues of online users have attracted attention. Privacy concerns in social media are mainly manifested in two aspects. The first one is the privacy game between netizens, that is, as more and more strangers entering into one's the social network, users' privacy boundary may get out of control, forming a kind of tug of war between peeking and being peeked. The second is the struggle between users and technology, which indicates that privacy is impossible to guarantee when big data dominates every aspects our lives and becomes panoramic. Based on the analysis, the author proposes two solutions to solve the above problems: personal restraint and laws and rules to regulate personal practices on the social media.
引文
[1]《中国网民权益保护调查报告2016》:54%的网民认为个人信息泄露严重2018年6月22日[EB/OL].http://www.isc.org.cn/zxzx/xhdt/listinfo-33759.html.
[2]方家喜.“黑市”与“黑客”侵蚀大数据安全专家表示,技术创新与完善法制是解决数据安全的两大关键[EB/OL].[2018-02-08].http://www.jjckb.cn/2018-02/08/c_136957564.htm.
[3]The Value of our Digital Identity[R].Published by Liberty Global.
[4]殷乐,李艺.互联网治理中的隐私议题:基于社交媒体的个人生活分享与隐私保护[J].新闻与传播研究,2016(b12):69-77.
[5]Lucy Handley.Four in 10 people have deleted a social media account in the past year due to privacy worries,study says[EB/OL].[2018-06-18].https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/18/people-are-deleting-social-media-accounts-due-toprivacy-worries.html?__source=twitter%7Cmain.
[6]菲利普·帕特森,李·威尔金斯.媒介伦理学:问题与案例[M].李青藜,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:135.
[7]Banisar D,Davies S.Global trends in privacy protection:An international survey of privacy,data protection,and surveilance laws and developments.Journal of Computer&Information Law,1999,18(1):3-111.
[8]Petronio,S.Boundaries of Privacy:Dialectics of disclosure[M].New York:State University of New York Press,2002:1,99,105.
[9]李兵,展江.英语学界社交媒体“隐私悖论”研究[J].新闻与传播研究,2017(4):98-112.
[10]吕耀怀.信息技术背景下公共领域的隐私问题[J].自然辩证法研究,2014(1):54-59.
[11]杰夫·贾维斯.公开--新媒体时代的网络正能量[M].南溪,译.北京:中华工商联合出版社,2013:128,170,269,133.
[12]企鹅智库(2017):2017年微信用户&生态研究报告[EB/OL].http://www.sohu.com/a/138987943_483389.
[13]蒋建国.微信朋友圈泛化:交往疲劳与情感疏离[J].现代传播2016,38(8):67-71.
[14]汪民安.机器身体:微时代的物质根基和文化逻辑[J].探索与争鸣,2014(7):12-14.
[15]周丽娜.大数据背景下的网络隐私法律保护:搜索引擎、社交媒体与被遗忘权[J].国际新闻界,2015,37(8):136-153.
[16]徐敬宏,张为杰,李玲.西方新闻传播学关于社交网络中隐私侵权问题的研究现状[J].国际新闻界,2014(10):146-158.
[17]彭兰.“连接”的演进--互联网进化的基本逻辑[J].国际新闻界,2013,35(12):6-19.
[18]黄莹.语境消解、隐私边界与“不联网的权利”:对朋友圈“流失的使用者”的质性研究[J].新闻界,2018(4).
[19]Young A L,Quan-Haase A.Information revelation and internet privacy concerns on social network sites:a case study of facebook[C]//International Conference on Communities and Technologies.ACM,2009:265-274.
[20]Tsay-Vogel M,Shanahan J,Signorielli N.Social media cultivating perceptions of privacy:A 5-year analysis of privacy attitudes and self-disclosure behaviors among Facebook users[J].New Media&Society,2016.
[21]Zhang W,Huang P.How motivations of SNSs use and offline social trust affect college students'self-disclosure on SNSs:An investigation in China[J].General Information,2011.
[22]Barnes S B.A privacy paradox:Social networking in the United States[J].2006,11(9).
[23]徐剑,商晓娟.社交媒体国际学术研究综述--基于SSCI高被引论文的观察[J].上海交通大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2015,23(1):102-108.
[24]维克托·舍恩伯格.删除:大数据取舍之道[M].袁杰,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2013:150,148,25,23,153,159.
[25]Marwick A E,Boyd D.I tweet honestly,I tweet passionately:Twitter users,context collapse,and the imagined audience.[J].New Media&Society,2010,20(1):1-20.
[26]董晨宇,丁依然.当戈夫曼遇到互联网--社交媒体中的自我呈现与表演[J].新闻与写作,2018(1):56-62.
[27]Gillen J,Merchant G.Contact calls:Twitter as a dialogic social and linguistic practice[J].Language Sciences,2013,35(1):47-58.
[28]袁梦倩.“被遗忘权”之争:大数据时代的数字化记忆与隐私边界[J].学海,2015(4):55-61.
[29]约书亚·梅罗维茨.消失的地域:电子媒介对社会行为的影响[M].肖志军,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2002:313.
[30]Koops B J.Forgetting Footprints,Shunning Shadows:ACritical Analysis of the'Right to Be Forgotten'in Big Data Practice[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2013,8:229-256.
[31]Fomenkova G I.For your eyes only?A Do Not Track proposal[J].Information&Communications Technology Law,2012,21(1):33-52.
[32]孟小峰,张啸剑.大数据隐私管理[J].计算机研究与发展,2015,52(2):265-281.
[33]涂子沛.大数据[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2012.
[34]Andrea Peterson.What people want forgotten online:social media posts[EB/OL].https://www.bendbulletin.com/business/3737562-151/what-people-want-forgottenonline-social-media-posts.
[35]黄霄羽,王墨竹.我的记忆谁做主?-社交媒体信息“数字遗忘权”的权责主体探讨[J].北京档案,2016(4):32-35.
[36]胡泳.从敞视、单视到全视[J].读书,2008(1):143-153.
[37]郝庭帅.当代社会生活的大数据化:困境与反思[J].社会发展研究,2014(3):196-211.
[38]Joshua Fairfield,Hannah Shtein.Big Data,Big Problems:Emerging Issues in the Ethics of Data Science and Journalism[J].Journal of Mass Media Ethics,2014,29(1):38-51.
[39]米歇尔·福柯.规训与惩罚[M].刘北成,杨远婴,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2007:226.
[40]Burkart P.Post-Privacy and Ideology[J].2014:218-237.
[41]Brandimarte L,Acquisti A,Loewenstein G.Misplaced Confidences:Privacy and the Control Paradox[J].Social Psychological&Personality Science,2012,4(3):340-347.
[42]Rafail P.Nonprobability Sampling and Twitter:Strategies for Semibounded and Bounded Populations[J].Social Science Computer Review,2017.
[43]王波伟,李秋华.大数据时代微信朋友圈的隐私边界及管理规制--基于传播隐私管理的理论视角[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(11):37-42.
[44]理查德·泰勒.助推[M].刘宁,译.北京:中信出版社,2009:93.
[45]Koops B J.Forgetting Footprints,Shunning Shadows:ACritical Analysis of the'Right to Be Forgotten'in Big Data Practice[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2013,8:229-256.
(1)邓巴数字又称为150定律,认为一个人维持紧密人际关系的人数最多为150人,其中一般朋友上限50人,亲密(包括可倾诉对象)的朋友上限15人,最信任朋友(包括至亲)上限5人。
