摘要
The effect of underwater shock wave on different target plates has been studied.An underwater shock wave generator(shock tube) was used to study the interactions between water and different constructed targets which act as shock wave mitigation.Target plates,composed of sandwich of two aluminum sheets with rubber and foam in between,were prepared and studied.For comparison,the target plates composed of triple aluminum sheets were tested.The study includes the testing of the selected plates in water under the effect of different peak pressures and the analysis of the results.The strain gauge data and displacement sensors results showed that the multi-layer plates have higher level of underwater shock wave mitigation than the triple aluminum plates with strain and deflection of nearly 50%.
The effect of underwater shock wave on different target plates has been studied.An underwater shock wave generator(shock tube) was used to study the interactions between water and different constructed targets which act as shock wave mitigation.Target plates,composed of sandwich of two aluminum sheets with rubber and foam in between,were prepared and studied.For comparison,the target plates composed of triple aluminum sheets were tested.The study includes the testing of the selected plates in water under the effect of different peak pressures and the analysis of the results.The strain gauge data and displacement sensors results showed that the multi-layer plates have higher level of underwater shock wave mitigation than the triple aluminum plates with strain and deflection of nearly 50%.
引文
[1]Shukla A,LeBlanc J.Dynamic response and damage evolution in composite materials subjected to underwater explosive loading an experimental and computational study.J Compos Struct 2010;92.
[2]National Research Council.Protecting building from bomb damage:transfer of blast-effects mitigation technologies from military to civilian applications.Washington:DC:National Academy;1995.
[3]Wiezerbicki T.Nurick GN.Large deformation of thin plates under localized impulsive loading.Int J Impact Eng 1996;18(7):899—918.
[4]Zhu L.Transient deformation modes of square plates subjected to explosive loadings.Int J Solids Struct 1996;33(3):301-14.
[5]Fleck NA,Deshpande VS.The resistance of clamped sandwich beams to shock loading.J Appl Mech 2004;71(3):386-401.
[6]Nurick GN,Gelman ME,Marshall NS.Tearing of blast loaded plates with clamped boundary conditions.Int J Impact Eng 1996;18(7):803.
[7]Galiev U.Experimental observations and discussion of counterintuitive behavior of plates and shallow shells subjected to blast loading.Int J Impact Eng 1996;18(7):783-802.
[8]Hammond L,Grzebieta R.Structural response of submerged air-backed plates by experimental and numerical analyses.Shock Vib2000;7(6):333-41.
[9]Teng TL,Liang CC,Liao CC.Nonlinear forced vibration analysis of the rectangular plates by the Fourier series method.Comput Mech I999;23(l):l-7.
[10]Ramajeyathilagam K.Vendhan CR Deformation and rupture of thin rectangular plates subjected to underwater shock.Int J Impact Eng2004;30(6):699-719.
[11]Fatt MS Hoo,Ouyang X,Dinan RJ.Blast response of walls retrofitted with elastomer coatings.Struct Mater 2004;15:129-38.
[12]Cui X,Zhao L,Wang Z,Zhao H,Fang D.Dynamic response of metallic lattice sandwich structures to impulsive loading.Int J Impact Eng2012;43:1-5.
[13]Liu X,Tian X,Jian T,Zhou D,Liang B.Blast resistance of sandwichwalled hollow cylinders with graded metallic foam cores.J Compos Struct 2012;94:2485-93.
[14]Shen J,Lu G,Zhao L,Qingining Zhang.Short sandwich tubes subjected to internal explosive loading.J Eng Struct 2013;55:56-65.
[15]Riccardo P,Serge A.Dynamic response of sandwich shells to underwater blasts.Cent Eur J Eng 2012;2(4):509-22.
[16]Avachat S.Zhou M.Effect of face sheet thickness on dynamic response of composite sandwich plates to underwater impulsive loading.J Exp Mech 2012;52:83-93.
[17]Park Wan J.Underwater explosion testing of catamaran-like structure vs.simulation and feasibility of using scaling law.Ocean Systems Engineering,KAIST;2012[Master's thesis].
[18]Misovec AP,David W.Explosion phenomena.Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center;1976.
[19]Cole RH.Underwater explosions.Princeton,New Jersey:Princeton University Press;1948.
[20]Salvge engineer's handbook,vol.1.S0300-A8-HBK-010.
[21]Reid WD.The response of surface ships to underwater Explosions.Department of Defense;1994.
[22]Zakrajsekl AJ,Miklaszewskil EJ.Guildenbecherl DR.Experimental analysis of blast mitigation associate with water sheets.Son School of Mechanical Engineering,Purdue University,West Lafayette IN 47905.
[23]Freiwald DA.Approximate blast wave theory and experimental data for shock trajectories in linear explosive driven shock tubes.J Appl Phys1972;43(5):2224-6.
[24]Alley D.Explosive blast loading experiments for TBI scenarios:characterization and mitigation.West Lafayette,IN:Purdue University;2009[Thesis].
[25]Lee S.Dynamic failure of blast-resistant structures subjected to impulsive loading.Evanston,IL,USA:Northwestern University;2005(Ph.D.thesis].
[26]Espinosa D,Lee S,Moldovan N.A novel fluid structure interaction experiment to investigate deformation of structural elements subjected to impulsive loading.Exp Mech 2()06;46(6):805-24.
[27]Schiffer A,Tagarielli L.The one-dimensional response of a water-filled double hull to underwater blast:experiments and simulations.Int J Impact Eng 2014:63:177-87.
[28]Guan W,Aktas A,Potluri P.Cantwell J,Langdon G,Nurick N.The blast resistance of stitched sandwich panels.Int J Impact Eng2014;65:137-45.
[29]Deshpande S,Heaver A,Fleck A.An underwater shock simulator.In:Proceeding of the royal society:2006.
[30]Perotti E,Deiterding R,Inaba K,Shepherd J,Ortiz M.Elastic response of water-filled fiber composite tubes under shock wave loading.Int J Solids Struct 2013;50:473-86.
