摘要
[目的]汉化护理学生完成能力量表(Nursing Students Competence Instrument,NSCI)并验证其信效度。[方法]在征得原作者授权后采用Brislin翻译模式进行正译、综合、回译,通过专家小组讨论,选择30名护理学生进行预调查,进行跨文化适度调适形成中文版NSCI;选择护理学生339名,验证该量表的信效度。[结果]中文版NSCI共27个条目,探索性因子分析共提取4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为72.17%。总量表的Cronbach′sα系数为0.909,各维度的Cronbach′sα系数为0.728～0.866。总量表的重测信度为0.835,各维度的重测信度为0.727～0.828。总量表的分半信度为0.803,各维度的分半信度为0.720～0.761。[结论]中文版NSCI具有良好的信效度,可用于评估护理学生的完成能力,同时为后续研究者了解护理学生的完成能力水平及实施相应的教育措施提供依据。
Objective:To verify the reliability and validity of the Chinesization Nursing Students Competence Instrument(NSCI).Methods:After obtaining authorization from the original author,30 nursing students were selected for pre-survey and cross-cultural moderate adjustment to form the Chinese version of NSCI by using Brislin translation model for orthogonal translation,synthesis,back translation and expert group discussion.339 nursing students were selected to verify the reliability and validity of the scale.Results:There were 27 items in Chinese version of NSCI.Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis.The cumulative variance contribution rate was 72.17%.The Cronbach′s alpha coefficient of the total table was 0.909,and the Cronbach′s alpha coefficient of each dimension was 0.728～0.866.The retest reliability of the total scale was 0.835,and the retest reliability of each dimension was 0.727～0.828.The half-fold reliability of the total table was 0.803,and the half-fold reliability of each dimension was 0.720～0.761.Conclusions:The Chinese version of NSCI had good reliability and validity,which could be used to evaluate the completion ability of nursing students,and provide basis for follow-up researchers to understand the level of completion ability of nursing students and implement corresponding educational measures.
引文
[1] MULDER M,GULIKERS J,BIEMANS H,et al.The new competence concept in higher education:error or enrichment?[J].Journal of European Industrial Training,2008,33(8/9):755-770.
[2] TAKASE M,TERAOKA S.Development of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale[J].Nursing&Health Sciences,2011,13(4):396-403.
[3] LIN C C,WU C J,HSIAO Y C,et al.An exploratory factor analysis for developing and validating a scale of Nursing Students Competence Instrument[J].Nurse Education Today,2017,50:87-91.
[4] SKULADOTTIR H,SVAVARSDOTTIR M H.Development and validation of a Clinical Assessment Tool for Nursing Education(CAT-NE)[J].Nurse Education in Practice,2016,20:31-38.
[5] HSU L L,HSIEH S I.Development and psychometric evaluation of the competency inventory for nursing students:a learning outcome perspective[J].Nurse Education Today,2013,33(5):492-497.
[6] AXLEY L.Competency:a concept analysis[M].UK:Blackwell Publishing Inc,2008:214-222.
[7]吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务—问卷分析与应用统计[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:62-72.
[8] BRISLIN R W.back-translation for cross-culture research[J].J Cross Cult Psychol,1970,1(3):185-216.
[9]郭金玉,李峥.量表引进的过程及评价标准[J].中华护理杂志,2012,47(3):283-285.
[10]吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:158-160.
[11]赵新爽,张洛灵,李转珍.癌症患者综合需求评估量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2017,52(1):34-39.
[12]张文彤,董伟.SPSS统计分析高级教程[M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2013:1.
[13] SANCHEZ R,BALLESTEROS M,ARNOLD B J.Validation of the FACT-G scale for evaluating quality of life in cancer patients in Colombia[J].Qual life Res,2011,20(1):19-29.
[14] TERWEE C B,BOT S D M,BOER M R D,et al.Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires[J].Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,2007,60(1):34-42.
[15]于媛,王黎,张娜,等.中文版肺癌患者病耻感量表的心理测量学评价[J].中华护理杂志,2017,52(5):636-640.
[16] WANG D,JONES M H,KHAIR M M,et al.Patient-reported outcome measures for the knee[J].The Journal of Knee Surgery,2010,23(3):137-151.
[17] MARIA C,KARLSSON M K,JAN-AKE N,et al.Validity,reliability,and responsiveness of a Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score(SEFAS)[J].Acta Orthopaedica,2012,83(2):197-203.
[18] BEIRER M,FIEDLER N,HUBER S,et al.The Munich Knee Questionnaire:development and validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Tool for knee disorders[J].Arthroscopy the Journal of Arthroscopic&Related Surgery,2015,31(8):1522-1529.
