认知偏差下的市场操纵和股价波动分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:A Research on Market Manipulation and Stock Price Volatility Based on Heterogeneous Beliefs
  • 作者:刘溪 ; 刘善存 ; 曾庆铎 ; 陈彬彬 ; 邴涛
  • 英文作者:LIU Xi;LIU Shan-cun;ZENG Qing-duo;CHEN Bin-bin;BING Tao;School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University;School of Economics and Management, BeiHang University;
  • 关键词:认知偏差 ; 理性预期均衡 ; 虚拟价值 ; 市场操纵
  • 英文关键词:cognitive bias;;rational expectation equilibrium;;virtual value;;market manipulation
  • 中文刊名:SSJS
  • 英文刊名:Mathematics in Practice and Theory
  • 机构:北京交通大学经济管理学院;北京航空航天大学经济管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-08
  • 出版单位:数学的实践与认识
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.49
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金(71371024,71171146);; 广义虚拟经济研究专项资助项目(GX2013-1014(M))
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SSJS201911002
  • 页数:8
  • CN:11
  • ISSN:11-2018/O1
  • 分类号:15-22
摘要
基于非知情交易者操纵市场的假设,考虑交易者对基本面存在认知偏差,构建了市场操纵下的理性预期均衡模型,通过比较市场操纵出现前后价格的波动,分析谣言信号传播对股票价格的影响.结论表明:噪声信息在市场的传播过程中加剧了股票的波动,降低了价格中的信息含量,使股票价格偏离其基本面价值,产生了虚拟价值,随着跟随交易者数量的增多,股价的波动可能会更加剧烈,价格持续偏离.
        This paper analyzes a rational expectation equilibrium model in which trader has a cognitive bias about the fundamental value to explore some implications of uninformed market manipulation. We discuss how rumors contagion influences the stock price by contrasting the manipulation model and benchmark model. It is shown that noise information aggravates the stock market volatility and reduces the price informativeness, which results in stock price deviation and generates virtual value. With the rise in the number of follow traders, the price fluctuates more intensely and keeps deviating from the fundamental value.
引文
[1]Allen F, Gale D. Stock-Price manipulation[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1992, 5(3):503-529.
    [2]Jiang G, Mahoney P G, Mei J. Market manipulation:A comprehensive study of stock pools[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2005, 77(1):147-170.
    [3]Azad A S M S, Azmat S, Fang V, et al. Unchecked manipulations, price-volume relationship and market efficiency:Evidence from emerging markets[J]. Research in International Business and Finance, 2014, 30(1):51-71.
    [4]Kyle A S. Continuous auctions and insider trading[J]. Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society, 1985, 53(6):1315-1335.
    [5]Bommel J V. Rumors[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2003, 58(4):1499-1520.
    [6]Allen F, Litov L, Mei J. Large investors, price manipulation, and limits to arbitrage:An anatomy of market corners, Review of Finance[J]. Review of Finance, 2006, 10(4):645-693.
    [7]Foster F D, Viswanathan S. Strategic trading with asymmetrically informed traders and long-livedinformation[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1994, 29(4):499-518.
    [8]夏昕阳,杨之曙.市场操纵:最新研究进展[J].证券市场导报,2004(11):50-56.
    [9]Vives X. Short-term investment and the information efficiency of the market[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1995, 8(1):125-160.
    [10]Froot K A, Scharfstein D S, Stein J C. Herd on the street:informational inefficiencies in a market with short-term speculation[J]. Journal of Finance,1992, 47(4):1461-1484.
    [11]李国平.行为金融学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
    [12]De Long J B, Shleifer A, Summers L H, et al. Noise trader risk in financial markets[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98(4):703-738.
    [13]陈炜,袁子甲,何基报.异质投资者行为与价格形成机制研究[J].经济研究,2013(4):43-54.
    [14]LONG J B, Shleifer A, Summers L H, et al. Positive feedback investment strategies and destabilizing rational speculation[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1990, 45(2):379-395.
    [15]Kyle A S. Informed speculation with imperfect competition[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,1989, 56(3):317-355.
    [16]Han B, Yang L. Social networks, information acquisition, and asset prices[J]. Management Science,2013, 59(6):1444-1457.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.