电网建设项目利益相关者治理机制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
利益相关者共同治理理论对于我国项目治理机制的健全发展具有重要的指导意义。本文以电网建设项目为研究对象,探讨电网建设项目基于多元利益相关者共同治理机制的构建。
     由于电网企业的自然垄断属性和公用型属性,长期以来,传统项目管理多是关注项目可行性或简单依靠施工技术的项目管理方式来赢得市场,而对电网建设项目反映的经济问题关注不够,这种竞争模式己经不适应市场经济发展的需要,项目管理面临一系列新的矛盾及问题。主要表现在向电网建设项目投入了各种专用性资产的多元利益相关者要求参与项目治理;多元利益相关者之间存在利益冲突;不确定条件下项目利益相关者的协调激励和约束等。同时,我国电网建设项目治理改革的深化及其成效的实现归根结底是关于电网建设项目治理模式的选择及其治理机制构建问题。所以,探寻这些问题的本质以及如何解决这些矛盾就成为本文的主要尝试和研究意义所在。
     本文首先通过对国内、外项目治理机制研究发展等作了广泛的文献回顾,对不同的理论观点进行了整理和述评,梳理出电网项目治理中存在的问题、形成原因及影响因素,基于委托代理理论、利益相关者理论等介绍本文研究的主要内容、基本方法及创新点。
     接着,通过对项目产权契约理论的批判性回顾和逻辑性推导,认为项目是一组不完全产权契约的临时性多边组织。随着社会经济文化环境和投入项目的专用性资产稀缺性的不断变化,项目所有权边际不断的调整,项目契约主体实现了向治理主体的转变。通过对电网建设项目治理模式的比较分析,揭示了项目治理机制的本质是多元利益相关者共同治理。
     本文从项目是“所有相关利益主体之间的一系列临时契约”的观点出发,认为这一组契约的主体包括建设单位、设计单位、施工单位、政府、基层组织及居民等多元利益相关参与主体。然后,将多元化的利益相关者抽象为理性经济人,发现他们的利益要求之间存在差异和冲突。既然有利益冲突,那就需要设计一种机制来协调、消除这些冲突,以合作代替冲突。论文认为电网建设项目作为一种财富创造和分配的有效机制,更多依赖的是多元利益主体之间的合作行为。项目治理机制的创新就是不断的对项目产权进行边际调整,平衡多元利益相关者的利益要求,从而实现项目目标。
     在市场竞争环境高度不确定性的条件下,如何通过建立项目多元利益相关者合作机制解决利益冲突?首先,在对电网建设项目内部利益相关者相互双方博弈机理进行分析的基础上,建立了项目内部利益相关者三方之间的行为博弈模型,通过博弈混合策略纳什均衡求解,对三方之间的博弈关系进行了分析,解释了不确定环境下的多元利益相关者的合作博弈模型的可操作性。
     针对电网建设项目存在的信息不对称,根据委托代理理论,从委托人(电网公司)与代理人(承包商或监理单位)之间存在的利益冲突入手,建立了针对道德风险的防范模型,同时在借鉴委托代理理论的激励约束机制基本分析框架基础上,建立了信息不对称条件下的最优激励与监控约束模型,并探讨分析了激励机制与监控约束机制在电网建设项目委托代理关系中的作用。
     针对电网建设项目外部利益相关者利益分享问题,论文探讨了在完全信息条件下电网公司、基层组织、当地居民三方合作博弈补偿机理,在此基础上根据电网建设项目利益相关者的个体行为特征,从不同利益相关主体博弈过程中的谈判成本和努力程度两方面着手,构建了基于外部利益相关者的冲突协调补偿机制模型,并借助Swarm工具方法对该补偿机制进行仿真比较分析,验证了冲突协调补偿机制的可操作性及有效性。旨在为管理者设计有效补偿机制维护各方利益,减少外部冲突,构建和谐的电网建设外部环境,加快电网建设步伐提供科学依据和决策支持。
     最后,论文通过对我国电网建设项目治理发展历程及现状分析,探索建立基于多元利益相关者共同治理的项目治理新模式,并提出了加强制度建设、建立激励与约束机制、加强电网建设市场信用建设、完善市场配套机制等几个方面的完善我国电网建设项目治理机制的建议。
Stakeholders in co-governance theory to improve the development of our corporate governance mechanism have important guiding significance. In this paper, power grid construction project governance mechanism as a study object to explore the power grid construction project which is based on multi-stakeholder co-management Mechanism.
     As the natural monopoly business property and the public good properties of the power , a long time, traditional project management are mostly concerned about the feasibility study or simply rely on the construction project management techniques to win the market, while pay insufficient attention to the economic problems reflected by grid construction projects.This competition model hasn’t adopted to the needs of market economic development, and project management faces a series of new contradictions and problems. Mainly to the multi-stakeholder who put a variety of specialized assets into the power grid projects demanded to participate in project governance; multi-stakeholder conflict of interest; uncertainty under the coordination of the project stakeholders and other incentives and constraints. Meanwhile, the deepening of management and reform of China's power grid enterprise project and realization of its effectiveness , in the final analysis, is a issue of Governance Selection and Mechanism construction on power grid construction project.Therefore, to explore the nature of these problems and how to resolve these conflicts become the main attempt of this article and research significance.
     Firstly, domestic and international project management through the development of management studies were extensively literature reviewed ,and sort out the governance of the project's history, key elements, trends, identifying existing shortcomings of previous studies. Based on principal-agent theory, stakeholder theory, explained the main contents, the basic approach and innovation of this paper.
     Then, through the critical review of ownership of the project contract theory and logical deduction, the project is regarded as a temporary multilateral organizations of property rights contract which is not entire. On this basis, that defines the content of the governance mechanism for grid construction projects, and illustrate theoretically the main content of grid construction project governance mechanism.
     This project starts from the view of "from all stakeholders between a series of temporary contracts", thinking that this is a group of subject construction unit, including the design, construction, government, community and residents in such diverse interests related. Then, the diversification benefits related subject abstract for rational agent, found their interests and conflicts having the request differences. Since there had a conflict of interest, then we should design a mechanism for coordinating and eliminating these conflicts, conflicting with cooperation. The paper believes grid construction projects as a kind of wealth creation and distribution of the effective mechanism, relying more on the main interest is the cooperation between behavior interests. Project management is the constant innovation of mechanism of marginal adjustment, property projects multiply interests balance of interests related to subject, so as to realize the goal of the project.
     Under conditions of high uncertainty of the competitive market environment, what we can do to resolve conflicts of the project through the establishment of the main multi-stakeholder co-operation mechanism? Firstly, based on the analysis the game mechanism within stakeholders with each other of in the power grid construction projects, then established the three main game models within the project stakeholder, Secondly, explores their game relationship through the game mixed strategy Nash equilibrium solution, Thirdly ,it explains the operability of the multi-stakeholder model of cooperative games under the uncertain environment .
     According to the asymmetric information of Power grid construction projects and the principal-agent theory, from the principal (grid companies) and agent’(contractor or supervision unit) conflicts of interest between each other, a model for the Prevention of Moral Hazard was established The dissertation sets up the model of preventing moral hazard which was based on the principal-agent theory. It builds the optimization incentive and monitoring model under the circumstance of asymmetric information to prevent moral hazard and explores the effects of incentive and monitoring mechanisms in the principal-agent relationship of Power grid construction projects.
     Power grid construction projects on the external stakeholders of benefit-sharing . Paper discusses the condition of complete information of the electric power company, grassroots organizations, local residents compensation mechanism of trilateral cooperation game. On this basis, Focusing on the behavioral characteristics of bargaining negotiations of the stakeholders of the external environment power grid construction and basing on a simple stakeholders ,the thesis constructs a compensation mechanism models about the power grid companies, grass-roots organizations and local residents. Analyze the kinds of mechanism through the simulation methods of Swarm, and verified the effectiveness of conflict in coordination compensation mechanism.Aim to design effective compensation mechanism for managers to safeguard interests of all parties, reduce the external conflicts, build a harmonious external environment of constructing power grids, and speed up construction of power grids to provide a scientific basis for further planning and decision support.
     Finally, by analyzing the development process and effect of current situation of the enterprise project management of China's power grid, the paper explores the establishment and improvement of multi-stakeholder based on a common new model of governance, and gives some suggestions such as strengthening the system, establishing incentive and restraint mechanisms, strengthening power grid construction market credit-building, and improving market mechanism..
引文
奥里弗·哈特.1996.公司治理理论与启示[J].经济学动态, (6):51-54.
    白思俊.2003.现代项目管理[M].北京:机械工业出版社.
    曹廷求.2003.公司治理理论面临的三大挑战[J].山西财经大学学报, (10): 56-57.
    陈长兵,李惠强.2007.我国核电工程管理委托与代理关系的经济学思考[J].管理世界,(6):62-63.
    陈宏辉.2003.企业的利益相关者理论与实证研究[D].浙江大学博士论文.
    陈建中.2009.导入契约管理提升治理水平[J].中国电力企业管理, 4(3):51-53.
    陈守军.2005.电网建设项目管理研究[D].北京邮电大学硕士论文.
    陈小新.2006.项目管理的经济学分析[M].北京:中国经济出版社.
    陈莹.2008.土地征收补偿及利益关系研究[D].华中农业大学博士论文.
    邓宏钟.2002.基于多智能体的整体建模仿真方法及其应用研究[D].国防科技大学硕士论文.
    丁荣贵.2004.张体勤.杨明海.项目组织的驱动机制研究[J].东岳论丛. (3):183-.188.
    丁荣贵.2007.项目治理的基本思想[J].项目管理技术,(1):72-75.
    丁荣贵.2007.多企业参与项目协作合同的建立策略[J].项目管理技术. (5):73-75.
    丁荣贵,孙涛.2008.政府投资产学研合作项目治理方式研究框架[J].中国软科学, (9): 101-111.
    邓曦东,段跃芳.2008.中国非志愿移民的补偿制度创新研究——基于利益相关者视角的分析[J].经济学家,(3):65-70.
    菲吕博顿,瑞切特. 1998.新制度经济学[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社.
    费方域.公司治理的理论前提及其意义[J].上海经济研究, 1996(6): 9-10.
    弗兰克H奈特. 2006.风险、不确定性与利润[M].安佳,译.北京:商务印书馆.
    郭峰,李体存.2008.铁路建设项目管理中的利益冲突与协调管理研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,5(6): 86-91.
    葛维平.2009.电网建设项目应用全寿命周期成本控制分析[J].电力建设, 30(7): 92-94.
    韩正华,周渝慧,吴俊勇.2007.基于博弈论的电力市场双边交易智能体谈判策略[J].电力系统自动化, 31(1):20-26.
    柯洪.2007.基于企业代建模式的公共项目管理绩效改善研究[D].天津大学博士论文.
    胡毅,刘庭.2008.输电线路建设和运行中的制约与技术创新胡[J].高电压技术, 34(11):2262-2269.
    何寿奎,傅鸿源.2007.公共项目公私伙伴关系合作机制研究[J].统计与决策, 250(22):60-62.
    江伟.2003.工程项目管理中信息不对称的对策研究[D].华北电力大学硕士论文.
    蒋中松,黄浩,瞿龙.2008.基于利益相关者理论的工程项日治理机制[J].中国工程咨询. 90(2):16-18.
    科斯,阿尔钦和诺斯等著. 1994.财产权利与制度变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店.
    科斯著.1994.论生产的制度结构. [M].上海:上海三联书店.
    雷春艳.2007.业主视角下的工程项目成功实证研究[ D].天津理工大学硕士论文.
    李德全.2002.发达市场经济国家和地区政府投资工程管理方式[J].建筑经济, (6):8-12.
    李新春.2000.企业家过程与国有企业的准企业家模型[J].经济研究,(6):51-57.
    李志勇.2008.景区用地中的三方博弈与农民利益保障[J].四川大学学报, 3:112-116.
    梁永宽.2008.项目管理中的合同治理与关系治理[D].中山大学博士论文.
    蔺石柱,闫文周.2006.工程项目管理[M].北京:机械工业出版社.
    刘江东.2006.大中型电网建设项目管理信息系统构建探讨[J].信息技术, (6):134-135.
    刘雷,李南.2009.建设项目动态联盟收益分配改进研究[J].土木工程学报, 42(1):133-139.
    柳瑞禹,陈其伟,冯智武. 2009.电力建设工程管理博弈分析[M].北京:科学出版社.
    李敬如.2009.关于协调电网建设与土地资源利用的对策建议[J].电力技术经济, 21(1):5-9.
    陆晓春.2008.基于项目治理的代建项目成功因素研究[D].天津大学博士论文.
    罗建华,杜军,肖光华.2004.国家投资建设项目业主代理模式的市场博弈分析[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版), (7):64-69.
    刘贞.任玉珑.2008.基于信号传递的电力市场竞价机制[J].系统工程, 26(2):35-39.
    马克思.1975.资本论[M].中央编译局,译.北京:人民出版社, PMT.
    [美]平乔维奇.1999.产权经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社.
    潘兹勇,褚晓虎,王一庆.2009,我国电网建设业主项目管理的发展及现状分析[J].项目管理, 320(6):8-1.
    Oliver Hart.1996.公司治理理论与启示[J].经济学动态,(6):51-54.
    全国一级建造师执业资格考试用书编写委员会.2009.建设工程项目管理[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社.
    任海云.2007.利益相关者理论研究现状综述[J].商业研究, 358(2):30-32.
    任钟淳,萧能意,韩涛.2003.电力工程项目管理的模式探讨[J].中国勘察设计,(4):21-25.
    沙凯逊,邓晓红.2001.欧盟建筑交易制度比较研究:启发与思考[J].建筑经济,(3):19-22.
    沙凯逊.2008.从管理到治理:建设项目理论演进探析[J].建筑经济, 308(6):12-14.
    沙凯逊,宋涛,亓霞,华冬冬.2008.从不确定性看建设项目的治理逻辑[J].山东建筑大学学报, 24(4):283-287.
    沙凯逊,宋涛,亓霞,华冬冬.2009.建设项目理论研究范式探析[J].项目管理技术, 7(5):13-18.
    苏喆,陈斌发,聂继军.2009.北京电网建设的外部环境分析及对策[J].农村电气化, (3):5-6.
    孙海玲,吴信平.2007.基于利益相关者的公私合营项目风险研究[J].商业现代化,507(6):153-155.
    唐清泉.2001.信息不对称下的激励与监控的模型分析[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版), (2).119-125.
    田国强.2003.经济机制理论:信息效率与激励机制设计[J] .经济学(季刊), 1, 272-308.
    汪斌,朱延琴.2006.公益性水利工程建设项目治理初探[J].水利水电科技进展, 26(6):76-80.
    王华,尹贻林.2004.基于委托-代理的工程项目治理结构及其优化[J].中国软科学,(11):93-96.
    王江华.2008.电网项目管理中业主管理现状及对策[J].湖北电力, 32(6):59-61.
    王文珂.2006.基于利益相关者的水电开发企业治理研究[D].河海大学博士论文.
    王姝.2009.中国电网建设纠纷成因及防范[J].中国电力企业管理, (7):57-59.
    王习明.2005.中国农民组织建设的现状:中国农民组织建设入户调查问卷分析报告[J].中国软科学, (9):7-15.
    王晓州.2008.建设项目管理的经济分析及制度设计[M].北京:中国铁道出版社.
    王晓州.2004.建设项目委托代理关系的经济学分析及激励与约束机制设计[J].中国软科学, (6): 32-34.
    王宣喻,瞿绍发,李怀祖.2004.私营企业内部治理结构的演变及其实证研究[J].中国工业经济,(1):70-77.
    王玉林.2005.工程项目治理研究[D].郑州大学硕士论文.
    魏纪泳.2006.多元利益主体共同治理机制研究[D].中国科学技术大学博士论文.
    吴家骏. 2003.公司治理结构研究中三种值得注意的倾向[J].当代财经, (l):81-86.
    Turner J R.师冬平译.2005.项目型组织中的治理[J].项目管理技术, (4):63-65.
    Turner R J.师冬平译.2006.项目管理理论及其架构[J].项目管理技术,(10):16-22.
    Turner J R,师冬平译. 2005.项目型组织中的治理[J].项目管理技术,(4):63-65.
    向鹏成.2005.基于信息不对称理论的工程项目风险管理研究[D].重庆大学博士论文.
    肖保国. 2009.电网建设的外部环境问题探析及对策[J].四川水利电力, 28(4):139-143.
    肖条军.2002.交通BOT项目投资的对策分析[J].经济数学, 19(4):43-49.
    新帕尔格雷夫经济学词典.1992.第三卷[M].北京:经济科学出版社.
    谢任敏,魏晓平.2006.项目利益相关者管理研究[J].科技管理研究, (1):168-171.
    谢识予,2006.经济博弈论(第三版)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社.
    徐解宪.2006.多经与主业业务关系急待规范[J].中国电力企业管理, (1):28-29.
    杨飞雪,汪海舰,尹贻林.2004.项目治理结构初探[J].中国软科学,(3):80-84.
    杨雪东.2005.“治理”的九种用法[J].经济社会体制比较,(2):96-99.
    颜红艳.2007.建设项目利益相关者治理的经济学分析[D].中南大学硕士论文.
    严玲,尹贻林,范道津.2004.公共项目治理理论概念模型的建立[J].中国软科学, (6): 31-32.
    严玲,赵黎明.2005政府投资项目双层多级委托代理链的分析[J].财经问题研究,(12):41-47.
    [美]埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆.2000.制度激励与可持续发展[M].陈幽泓,谢明,任睿,译.上海:上海三联书店.
    尹贻林,胡杰.2006.基于利益相关者核心价值分析的公共项目成功标准研究[J].中国软科学,(5):149-155.
    尹贻林,闫孝砚.2002.政府投资项目管理模式研究[M].天津:南开大学出版社.
    严玲,尹贻林.2003.对非经营性政府投资工程管理模式的比较和选择[J].天津理工学院学报, (6):19-22.
    尹贻林,严玲.2003.政府投资项目组织实施方式及其监督体系研究[J].中国软科学, (12):12-17.
    杨宏伟,何建敏,周晶.2004.在BOT模式下收费道路的收益和社会效益研究[J].管理工程学报, 18(1): 27-29.
    杨经福.2002.投资项目利益相关者分析:[ D].河海大学硕士论文.
    杨其静.2002.合同与企业理论前沿综述[J].经济研究,(1):80-88.
    杨瑞龙,周业安.2001.企业的利益相关者理论及其应用[M].北京:经济科学出版社.
    于伯华,吕昌河.2006.北京市顺义区土地资源竞争与土地利用变化分析[J].农业工程学报, 22(10):94-97.
    周国栋,吴明坤.2006.电网项目管理的政府与市场分工[J].改革,146(4):23-26.
    章国息.2004.工程建设项目代建制初探[J].项目管理技术, (8):41-45.
    张五常.1983.企业的契约性质[M].北京,北京大学出版社.
    陈郁.1996.企业制度与市场组织[M].上海:上海人民出版社.
    张立君.2000不完全契约,资产专用性与最优企业所有权安排.经济评论, (4): 240-269.
    张维迎.1995.企业的企业家:契约理论[M].上海:上海人民出版社.
    张维迎.1999.企业理论与中国企业改革[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
    张维迎.2004.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社.
    张维迎.2005.产权激励与公司治理[M].北京:经济科学出版社.
    周国健.2007.基于治理的建设项目理论探讨[J].山西建筑, (2): 136-139.
    周艺清.2008.地市层面电力多经企业法人治理结构规范管理探讨[J].财经与管理, (12):1 124-124.
    张华平,马燕,阮斐.2004.政府投资工程实施方式的代建制改革研究[J].建筑经济, (12):23-30.
    张庆华,何庆旭,魏长星,王娅.2009.从项目治理谈上程项目管理的发展[J].项目管理技术, 7(11):72-76.
    张兴华,刘建进.2003.我国非正规部门的发展与政策取向[J].中国劳动, 11:16-17.
    张阳,唐震,王文珂.2007.水电开发企业利益相关者治理模式探讨[J].水利水电科技进展, 10(5):75-79.
    周其仁.1997.“控制权回报”和“企业家控制的企业”一一“公有制经济”中企业家人力资本产权的个案研究[J].经济研究,(5): 31-42 .
    朱亮,黄怡,江全元.2008.多智能体开发系统SWARM在电力系统中的应用[J].高电压技术, 34(3):550-554.
    Abednego M P,Ogunlana S O.2006.Good project governance for proper risk allocation in Public-Private Partnerships in Indonesia[J].International Journal of Project Management, 24(7):622-634.
    Aghion P,Tirole J.1997.Formal and real authority in organizations[J].Journal of Political Economy, 105(1):1-29.
    Ansotf H I. 1965. Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion[M].McGrawHill New york..
    Ashley,Workman.1996.Incentives in Construction Contracts[A].Construction Industry Institute, Austin,TX.
    Ballard G,Howell G A.2003.Lean project management[J]. Building Research and Information, 31(2):119-133.
    Bologna R,Nord R.2000.Effects of the law reforming public works contracts on the Italian building progress[J].Building Research and Information, 28(2):109-118.
    Brener W,Kok K.2000.The Dutch construction industry:a combination of competition and corporatism[J].Building Research and Information, 28(2):96-108.
    Bridge A J,Tisdell C.2004.The determinants of the vertical boundaries of the construction firm[J].Construction Management and Economics, 22(10):807-825.
    Campagnac E.2000.The contracting system in the French constructionindustry:actors and institutions[J].Building Research and Information, 28(2):131-140.
    Christopher N S.1996.Negotiation and renegotiations of finance Contracts under the threat of predation[J]. The journal of Industrial Economics , ( 9 ):325-343.
    Clarkson,M.1995.A Stakeholder of framework for Analpzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance [J].Academy Management Review, 20(1).
    Cox,A.,Thompson,I.1998.Contracting for Business Success[M].Thomas Telford,London. Deddy Koesrindartoto, Junjie Sun.2005.An agent-based computational laboratory for testing the economic reliability of wholesale power market designs[C]. IEEE power engineering society general meeting. 931-936.
    Dodd E M, Jr.1932.For whom are corporate managers trustees?[J]. Harvard Law Review, 45(7):1145-1163.
    E. S. Savas.2000.Privatization and Public-Private Partner-ships [M]. Seven Bridge Press, LLC, Fifth Avenue , New York,London, 105-106.
    Freeman R E.1984.Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach[M]. Boston, MA: Pitman.
    Gann D,Salter A.2003.Project baronies:Growth and governance in the project-based firm.DRUID, Summer Conference.
    Graham M W inch.2001.Governing the project process: a conceptual framework construction[J]. Managementand Economics, 19: 799-808.
    Greenwald B C,Joseph E S.1990. Asymmetric information and the new theory of the firm: Financial contraints and risk behavior[J]. American Economic Review,(80):160-165.
    Grimble R, Wellard K.1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management : A review of principles ,contexts, experience and opportunities [J]. Agricultural Systems, 55(2):173-193.
    Grossman S,Hart O.1986.The costs and benefits of ownership:A theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration[J].Journal of political Economy, 94(4):691-719.
    Hart O.,Moore J. 1988.Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation. Econometrica, 56 (4): 755-785.
    Hart O,Moore J.1990.Property rights and the nature of the firm[J].Journal of Political Economy, 98(6):1119-1158.
    HazardV, Crawford L H.2004.Defining project governance [A]. Proceedings of ProMAC Research Conference 2004: Society of Project Management (SPM, Japan), Nanyang Technological University (NTU, Singapore) and Tsinghua University (China)[C]. Tokyo, Japan.
    HU Yi,LIU Ting.2008.Restriction and Technological Innovation in Construction and Operation of Power Grid [J].High Voltage Engineering, 34(11):2262-2269.
    Jan Terje Karlsen.2002.project stakeholder management,Engineering Management Journal, 14(4):19-25.
    Jonas soderlund.2004.Building theories ofprojectsmanagement:past research, question for future[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 22:183-191.
    Keith Lambert.2003.Project governance[J].World ProjecMt anagement Week,(3): 8-9.
    Koskela L,Ballard G.2006.Should project management be based on theories of economics or production[J].Building Research and Information, 34(2):154-163.
    Koskela L,Howell G.2002.The underlying theory of project management is obsolete[C]//Slevin D,Cleland D,Pinto J.Proceedings of PMI Research Conference.Seattle:Project Management Institute, 293-302.
    Lambert K.2003.Project Governance[J].World Project Management Week.27 March.
    Larry G.Crowley.1995.Conceptual Model of Partnering[J].Journal of management in gineering, (9):33-39.
    Larson,A.1992.Network dyads in entrepreneurial setting:A study of the governance of change relationships[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, (37):76-104.
    Larson E.1995.Project partnering:results of study of 280 construction projects[J].Journal Management in Engineering, (2):30-35.
    Larson E.1997.Partnering on construction projects:A study of the relationship between rtneringactivities and project success[J].Engineering Management, (44):188-195.
    LI Jing-ru .2009.Countermeasures and Suggestions on Balancing between Power Grid Construction and Land Use [J].Electric Power Technologic Economics, 21(1):5-9.
    Littman ML.1999. Markov. games as a framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning. In: proc. of the int'l Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC'99). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 464-468.
    Miller R,Hobbs B.2005.Governance regimes for large complex projects[J].Project management Jouranl, 36(3):42-50.
    Mitchell R K ,Agle A R, Wood D J.1997.Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience:Defining the Principle of Who an What Really Counts[J]. Academy of Management Review, 22(4):853-886.
    Mohsini,R.A,Davidson,C.H.1992.Determinants of performance in the traditional building process,Construction and Economics, 10(4):343-359.
    Morris P.1994.The Management of Projects[M].London:Thomas Telford. Penrose E.1959.The theory of the growth of the firm.Oxford University Press.
    Peter Scharle. 2002.Public-Private Partnership(PPP)as a Social Game (3).
    Piteroforte R,Miller J B.2002.Procurement methods for US infrastructure:historical perspective and recenttrends[J].Building Research and Information, 30(6):425-434.
    PMI.1996.A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge[M].Newtown Square:Project Management Institute.
    Pryke S,Pearson S.2006.Project governance:case studies on financia incentives [J]. Building Research and Information, 34(6):534-545.
    Reeves K.2002.Construction business system in Japan:general contractors and subcontractors[J]. Building Research and Information, 30(6):413-424.
    R·E·Freeman.1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder( M) , Pitman Boston MA. Rodney Turner J.2004.Communication and co-operation on projects between the projectowneras principaland the project manager as agent[ J]. European Management Journal(6): 12-15.
    Rodney,Turner J.2003.On the nature of the projectas a temporary organization[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 21: 1-8.
    Ross, S .1973 The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem[J]. American Economic Review, ( 63):134-142.
    Spence, M and R Zechhauser.1971.Insurance, Information and Individual Action[J]. American Economic Review, (61):380-387.
    Syben G.2000.Contractors take command:from a demand-based towards a procedure-oriented modelin German construction[J].BuildingResearchandInformation, 28(2):119-130.
    Turner J R.1993.The Handbook of Project-based Management[M].London:McGraw-Hill. Turner J R,Keegan A E.2001.Mechanism of governance in the project-based organization:a transaction cost perspective[J].European Management Journal, 19(3): 254-267.
    Turner J R,Müller R.2003.On the nature of the project as a temporary organization[J]. International Journal of project Manage ,21(1):1-8.
    Turner J R.2004.Communication and co-operation on projects between the project owner as principal and the project manager as agen[J].European Management Journal.(5):254-267.
    Turner J R.2006.Towards a theory of project management:The nature of the project governance and project management[J].International Journal of Project Management,(24):93-95.
    Turner R J.2004.Farsighted project contract management:incomplete in its entirety[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 22(1):75-83.
    W illiamson O. E.1995.Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond [M]. Expanded Edition,New York: OxfordUniversity Press, 168-205.
    Williamson O E.2000.The new institutional economics:taking stock,looking ahead[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3):595-613.
    Wilson R.1969.The Structure of Incentive for Decentralizationunder Uncertainty La Decision.
    Winch G.1989.The construction firm and the construction project:a transaction coat approach[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 7(3):331-345.
    Winch G M.2000.Institutional reform in British construction:partnering and private finance[J]. Building Research and Information, 28(2):141-155.
    Winch G M.2001.Governing the project process:a conceptual framework[J]. Construction Management and Economics,(19):799-808.
    Winch G.2002.Managing Construction Projects:an Information Processing Approac[M]. Oxford:Blackwell Science.
    Winch G M. 2006.Towards a theory of construction as production by projects[J].Building Research and Information, 34(2):164-174.
    OECD. 2004. OECD principles of corporate governance,revised edn[M]. Paris, France: OECD.
    Xiaojin Wang;Jing Huang.2006.The Relationships between key Stakeholders’project performance and project success:perceptions of Chinese construction supervising engineers,International Journal of Project Management, 24(3):253-260.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.