大学生适应性量表的编制与标准化
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
人在进入陌生环境的时候,都有一个适应的过程,这个过程包括对新环境的熟悉,以及了解环境对自己的要求,并主动调整身心状态以使自己获得更好的发展。如何看待和处理适应问题将影响到个人的自身发展以及未来社会的发展,因而理应受到我们的关注。
     适应性表示个体与他所处环境有效、恰当地相互作用的程度。对于适应性的结构,目前还没有统一的说法。本研究从人-环境关系的角度出发,结合有关理论研究和开放式调查的结果,得出大学生适应性的“七因素相关模型”,即学习适应性、人际适应性、角色适应性、职业选择适应性、生活自理适应性、环境的总体认同/评价、身心症状表现。
     根据以上理论维度编制项目,经过项目评价和预试,最终形成正式的“大学生适应性量表”(CSAI)。以本量表为主要调查工具,对8所高校的1043名大学生进行施测,利用因素分析、回归分析、聚类分析和判别分析等统计方法对研究数据进行分析,结果发现:(1)“大学生适应性量表”具有较好的信、效度,用来做研究是可靠、有效的。(2)人际适应性是大学生适应性结构体系中最重要的因素。(3)与其他因素相比,人际适应性与大学生的身心健康和生活质量的联系更加密切。(4)大四毕业生在各种适应性水平上表现最强,而大一新生并非在所有适应性方面都是最弱的,相反在某些方面(如环境认同)他们的适应能力甚至超过了高年级学生。(5)大学生在职业准备和环境认同方面适应性较差,而在生活自理方面则表现出较强的适应能力。与以往研究不同的是,大学生的人际适应能力并不是最差的。(6)聚类分析发现,三类大学生在各分测验上呈现出低、中、高不同层次、方向一致的水平差异,分别将其命名为:“强型”(适应性较强)、“中间型”(适应性一般)、“弱型”(适应性较差)。通过Fisher判别函数可以对被试直接进行鉴别分类。同时还发现,“环境总体认同”这一变量对于大学生的适应性类型鉴别力更强。
The course of fixing in with new environment is adaptation, which includes familiariz -ing the environment and knowing about its demands, and adjusting actively one's somatic and mental habitus to make oneself develop better. How to regard and deal with adaptation problems, which is in relation to one's adaptablity, will affect not just personal development, but social development in the future. Thus it must be taken into account by us.
    Adaptablity indicates the degree of one's interaction with his or her surroundings efficiently and adequately. At present we have no common viewpoints about the structure of adaptability. From a person-environment relation perspective, this study gains a "Seven-factor-correlation Model" of college student adaptability, referring to the findings of relevant theoretical research and open-ended survey. These factors contain "Learning Adaptability", "Interpersonal Adaptability", "Self Adaptablity", "Career Choice Adaptablity", "Livelihood Self-management Adaptablity", "Environmental General Evaluation" and "Somatic-mental Symptom".
    We compile items in accordance with the foregoing theoretical constitution. After item evaluation and pretesting, "College Student Adaptability Inventory" (CSAI) comes into being ultimately. With this inventory, we tested 1043 undergraduates of 8 colleges in Wuhan. Then using factor analysis, regression analysis, cluster analysis and discriminant analysis, we analyze the research data and find: (a) CSAI has good potency and reliability and validity with proving that it's reliable and valid as research implement, (b) "Interpersonal Adaptability" is the most important factor in the structure of college student adaptability, (c) "Interpersonal Adaptability" is more connected with measures of college students' somatic and mental health and life quality than other factors, (d) As predicted in our hypotheses, the seniors are the most strong in all kinds of adaptability. The freshmen are not the most weak in all of the factors, and on the contrary, their adaptability even surpasses that of the seniors in some aspects, e.g. "Environmental General Evaluation", (e) The results of cluster analysis show that three sorts of college students' scores on seven secondary scales have the same differences at three levels. The three sorts are respectively named after "Strong Type",
    
    
    
    
    "Midst Type" and "Weak Type". We can directly classify new subjects by Fisher linear discriminant functions. We also find that "Environmental General Evaluation" variable has more potency in discriminating and classifying college students according to their adaptabilty.
引文
Altschuler, Glenn C. (2000). Adapting to College Life In an Era of Heightened Stress. New York Times, Vol 149, Issue 51472, Section 4A, 12-13.
    Bartini, Maria (2001). A longitudinal investigation of the development of gender role flexibility in early adolescence. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, Jun; Vol 60(11 B): 5809.
    Boles, Scott Alan(1997). A model of parental representations, adolescent individuation, and psychological adjustment in late adolescence and early adulthood. Dissertation Abstracts International. Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, Jan; Vol57(7 B): 4741.
    Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1-30.
    Compas, B. E., Wagner, B. M., Slavin, L. A. Vannatta, K. (1986). A prospective study of life events, social support, and psychological symptomatology during the transition from high school to college, American Journal of Community Psychology, 14.
    Gardner, H. (1983 ). Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books.
    Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligence: the theory in practice. New York: Bantam Books.
    Hall, Kenneth E. (1978). A preliminary investigation of adaptive functioning as a multidimensional construct of mental health. Dissertation Abstracts International, Apr; Vol 38(10-A): 6012.
    Harrison, Patti L. (1987). Research with aclapfive behavior scales, dournal of Special Education, Vol 21, (1).
    Hays, R. B., Oxley, D.(1986). Social network development and functioning during a life transition. dournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2).
    Hightower, A. D., Work, W. C., Cohen, E. L., Lotyczewski, B. S., Spinell, A. P., Guare, J. C., & Rohrbeck, C.A. (1986). the Teacher-child Rating Scale: A brief objective measure of elementary children's school problem behaviors and competences. Schoolpsychology Review, 15, 393-409.
    Huebner, Ruth A; Emery, Lynnda-J; Shordike, Anne (2002). The Adolescent Role Assessment: Psychometric properties and theoretical usefulness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, US: American Occupational Therapy Assn, Mar-Apr; Vol 56(2): 202-209.
    
    
    Hunberg, B., Pancer, S., Pratt, M., Alisat, S. (1996). The transition to university: Is religion related to adjustment?. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 7.
    John Heywood (1989). Learning Adaptability, and Change: the challenge for education and industry. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 207.
    Keith, T Z., Fehrman, P. G., & Harrison, P. L. et al. (1987). The relation between adaptive behavior and intelligence: Testing altemative explanations. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 31-43.
    Lamothe, D., Currie, F., Alisat, S., et al. (1995). Impact of social support intervention on the transition to university. Canadian Journal of Community, Mental Health, 14(2).
    Lindley, Lori Dawn (2001). Personality, other dispositional variables, and human adaptability. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, Jan; Vol 62(6 B): 2984.
    Martin, Matthew M., & Anderson, Carolyn M.(2002). The relationship between cognitive flexibility and affinity seeking strategies. In: Columbus, Frank (Ed.), Advances in psychology research, Vol 4., 93-100.
    Martin, Matthew M; Anderson, Carolyn M; Thweatt, Katherine S (2001). Aggressive communication raits and their relationships with the cognitive flexibility scale and the communication flexibility scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, US: Select Press, Sep; Vol 13(3): 531-540.
    Motamedi, Kurt K. (1977). Adaptability and capability: A study of social systems, their environment, and survival. Group and Organization Studies, US: Sage Publications, Dec; Vol 2(4): 480-490.
    Peiro, Jose M; Garcia Montalvo, Jose; Gracia, Francisco (2002). How do young people cope with job flexibility?: Demographic and psychological antecedents of the resistance to accept a job with non-preferred flexibility features. Applied-Psychology: An Intemational Review, US: Taylor and Francis, Jan; Vol 51(1): 43-66.
    Platt, L. O., Kamphaus, R. W., & Cole, R. W., et al. (1991). Relationship between adaptive behavior and intelligence: Additional evidence. Psychological Reports, 68, 139-145.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Stemberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: a new theory of human intellgence. New York: Viking.
    Stewart, A. J., Sokol, M., & Healy, J. M., et al. (1986). Longitudinal studies of psychological consequences of life changes in children and adults. Journal of Personanlity and Social psychology, 50, (1).
    Van Oudenhoven, Jan Pieter, Van der Zee, Karen I; Van Kooten, Mariska (2001). Successful adaptation
    
    strategies according expatriates. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, US: Elsevier Science, Oct; Vol 25(5): 467-482.
    Wallis, Jeffrey R., & Barrett, Paula M.(1998). Adolescent adjustment and the transition to high school. Journal of Child and Family Studies, US: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, Mar, Vol 7(1): 43-58.
    陈会昌.德育忧思录.华文出版社,1999,257.
    陈会昌,胆增寿,陈建绩.青少年心理适应性量表(APAS)的编制及其初步常模.心理发展与教育,1995.
    陈建绩,陈会昌.对中小学生的气质、心理适应性和意志品质的测试与分析.教育理论与实践,1988,(3):26-30.
    陈建文.青少年社会适应的的理论与实证研究:结构、机制和功能.西南师范大学心理系2001年硕士论文.
    陈庆红.浅谈高校学生的社会适应性问题.福州师专学报,1991,(3):21-24.
    邓百祥.少数昔日优等生的角色更替与适应.韶关大学学报,1997,18(3):162-166.丁翠云.要注重大学生心理适应能力的培养.海淀走读大学学报,2000,51(3):35-37.
    杜仕勇.专科生的心理健康、入学动机及适应状况的初步研究.四川商业高等专科学校学报,2001,9:36-40.
    范存欣,马绍斌.大学生心理健康测查结果的研究.中国学校卫生,1998,19(4):262-264.
    范存欣,马绍斌,林汉生,王惠苏.大学生心理健康状况及其影响因素的逐步回归分析.中国学校卫生,2001,22(3):215-216.
    樊富珉.社会现代化与人的心理适应.清华大学学报(哲社版),1996,(4).
    范希文,贺丽娜,代向芬,沈宜元.600名儿童美国社会适应行为量表测定结果分析.中国行为医学科学,1997,6(2):101-103.
    付邦道,吴翔.论人类心理行为地域差异的地理背景.开封教育学院学报,2001,21(1):40-41.
    傅宏,庄立,郭继东.大学生心理适应指导.北京:高等教育出版社,1992.
    古南永.对大学新生的心理适应教育.中山大学学报论丛,2000,20(4):43-44.
    郭兰婷,单友荷,张惠开,张秋水,赵小菲.AAMD儿童适应行为量表的初步试用.中国临床心理学杂志,1998,6(1):38-41.
    
    
    郭兰婷,单友荷,张惠开,张秋水,赵小菲.影响学龄儿童适应行为的因素分析.中国心理卫生杂志,1998,12(4):207-209.
    赫尔.心理机制和适应性行为.西方心理学家文选,张述祖等译.人民教育出版社,1984,226-251.
    贾晓波.心理适应的本质与机制.天津师范大学学报(社科版),2001,(1):19-23.
    孔维民.适应的分型与适应能力的培养.淮北煤矿师院学报,1991,(3).
    雷开明,张敏,王振勇.重庆地区大学生职业准备心理状况及成因的调查研究.西南师范大学学报(人文社科版),2000,(2):70-74.
    黎凡.兰州地区4868名大学生神经衰弱调查报告.中国心理卫生杂志,1988,(4).
    李洪,徐玉善.试析校园环境与素质教育.合肥工业大学学报(社科版),2000,14(1):58-59.
    李淑然,纪秀琴,唐惠明.1978-1987年北京十六所大学本科生因精神疾病休学、退学情况分析.中国心理卫生杂志,1989,(3).
    刘航英,郑淑芹,吕维,吴洪剑,徐志敏,王壮业.1048名3~12岁儿童适应行为及相关因素的调查.中国临床心理学杂志,2001,9(1):47-48.
    刘宏毅.新生适应状况倾向性研究.重庆商学院学报,1997,(3):56-60.
    刘立新.大学生社会适应性评价结构维度的探讨.北京师范大学心理系2000年硕士论文.
    时勘,王文忠,孙健,Martin Maehr.学习适应性动机模型的初步研究.心理发展与教育,1995,(1):8-13.
    陶沙.从生命全程发展观论大学生入学适应.北京师范大学学报(人文社科版),2000,(2):81-87.
    童秀英,姜雅东,刘伟洋.职技高师低年级学生心理适应状况的调查研究.河北职业技术师范学院学报,2001,15(3):53-56.
    王淑兰.十二所院校大学生精神病的心理学研究.青年探索,1991,(2).
    王小棉.自我适应与适应环境的心理分析.心理科学,2000,23(1):117-118.
    王学臣,牛庆忠.大学毕业生社会适应状况调查.健康心理学杂志,2001,9(4):271-272.
    杨青.关于深圳大学学生心理适应水平的研究.内蒙古师大学报(哲社版),2000,29(2):100-103.
    杨泰.家庭环境对大学生心理健康影响的研究.齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2001,22(6):677-678.
    杨志坚.关于大学生社会适应问题的社会心理学分析.云南高教研究,1998,(4):92-94.
    姚树桥,龚耀先.儿童适应行为评定量表全国常模的制定.中国临床心理学杂志,1993,1(2):76-80.
    姚树桥,周世杰,王丽等.幼儿适应技能璾定量表的编制.中国临床心理学杂志,1999,7(2):81-85,96.
    
    
    于丽萍.论大学新生的心理适应问题.首都师范大学学报(社科版),1997,(4):108-112.
    赵富才.大学新生心理适应问题研究.健康心理学杂志,1999,7(4):397.
    赵铭裼.学生心理适应不良者人格特征分析.健康心理学杂志,2001,9(5):346-347.
    赵霞.谈社会现代化进程中大学生的心理适应.镇江高专学报,1999,(1):20-22.
    朱智贤.心理学大辞典.北京:北京师范大学出版社,1989.
    宗鹏林.怎样预防适应性障碍.医疗与保健,2001,(5):37.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.