摘要
社会认知领域的研究表明,人们对社会信息的加工不仅包含一个外显的过程,而且还包含一个内隐的、无意识的自动过程,态度可分为外显态度和内隐态度,外显态度和内隐态度之间的分离可以通过探测二者之间的相关(IEC)来推断。从20世纪30年代起,研究们就对态度的改变进行了深入的探讨,目前主要采用评价性条件反射范式考察态度的形成及改变过程。
本研究主要考察中等职业学校学生的中职教育内隐态度,并在此基础上对中职学生的中职教育内隐态度进行干预研究。以帮助中职生建立积极的中职教育观念,提升职业教育的影响力,促进中职教育的发展。具体地,本研究包含三个实验：实验一采用IAT测验,探讨中职生对中职教育的内隐态度；实验二采用内隐态度测量和外显态度测量相结合的AMP测量方法,匹配了内隐和外显测量结构上的一致性,试图了解中职生的中职教育内隐态度和外显态度是否分离；实验三采用阈下评价性条件反射技术探讨改变中职教育内隐态度消极偏向的可行性。结果发现：
1.中职生中存在着对中职教育的消极内隐态度,且没有性别差异。
2.中职生的中职教育内隐态度和外显态度存在一定程度的分离。
3.通过阈下评价性条件反射训练,中职生对中职教育的内隐态度在短时间内会发生改变。
In cognitive social research indicated that people cure social information not only an explicit process but also an implicit, unconsciousness self-motion process, namely explicit attitude and implicit attitude. researches tried to use Implicit-Explicit Correlation(IEC) method exploring the separation construction of explicit attitude and implicit attitude. From the thirty of the 20th century, researchers mainly used subliminal evaluative conditioning to explore attitude formation and its changes process when studying the technique of attitude change.
This paper maily research on the secondary vocational education implicit attitude of secondary vocational education students. And on this basis research the vocational students in vocational education intervention study of implicit attitudes,to help students develop a positive concept of vocational education,enhance the impact of vocational education,promote vocational education. Specifically,this paper had three experiments:the first experiment used IAT to explore secondary vocational education student's subliminal evaluative conditioning implicit attitude; the second experiment used AMP method which combine the same structure of implicit and explicit attitude measures, to explore the degree of separate of implicit and explicit attitude in the secondary vocational education students; the third experiment used subliminal evaluative conditioning to explore how to change the negative implicit attitude. The conclusions were as follows:
First, the secondary vocational education students had negative implicit attitude of secondary vocational education, and no sex differencs.
Second, the secondary vocational education students'implicit and explicit attitude showed a certain degree of separation.
Third, the secondary vocational education students'implicit attitude of secondary vocational education will be changed in a short time after subliminal evaluative conditioning training.
引文
蔡华俭.(2003).Greenwald提出的内隐联想测验介绍.心理科学进展.11(3),339-344.
陈启山,年承涛,温忠麟.(2005).印象整饰与内隐态度效应.心理科学.28(3),634-635.
戴海琦,张峰,陈雪枫.(2006).心理与教育测量.广州：大学出版社,382-383.
高旭辰.(2003).IAT效应在不同目标水平上的差异研究.心理科学,26(4),628-630.
贺雯,梁宁建.(2010).态度内隐测量方法的发展与探索.心理科学.Psychological Science 33(2),384-386.
侯珂,邹泓,张秋凌.(2004).内隐联想测验信度、效度及原理.心理科学进展.12(2),223-230.
梁宁建,吴明证,邱扶东等.(2004).互联网成瘾者内隐网络态度极其干预研究.心理科学.27(4),796-798.
齐玲.(2008).内隐测量和外显测量一致性影响因素的实证研究.硕士学位论文.武汉体育学院.
任婕.(2008).苏南苏北地域刻板印象.苏州大学.
邵艳杰.(2005).我国中等职业教育存在的主要问题及对策.山东师范大学.
温家宝.(2005).大力发展中国特色的职业教育.中国教育报,11.
王露艳.(2009).网络游戏成瘾倾向者的内隐态度及其干预研究.苏州大学.
吴明证.(2001).社会认知中内隐态度的理论和实验研究.华东师范大学.
吴明证.(2004).内隐态度的理论与实验研究(博士学位论文).华东师范大学.
汪伟.(2008).IAT在内隐助人态度上的应用.心理学探新.28(3),93-96.
王秀丽,彭杜宏,吴铁钧.(2008).大学生内隐与外显合作态度的比较研究.高教探索.(1),129-131.
王湛.(2000).坚持积极发展职业教育的方针不动摇.职业通讯,12.
徐文婕.(2007).大学生对老年人外显态度和内隐态度的测量与比较.郑州大学.
叶娜,左斌。(2007).联想-命题评价模型——态度改变的新解释.心理科学进展.15(5),834-839.
于泳红.(2003).大学生内隐职业偏见和内隐职业性别刻板印象研究.心理科学.26(4),672-675.
张林,张向葵.(2003).态度研究的新进展——双重态度模型.心理科学进展.11(2),171-176
张新民.(2009).明确办学和育人定位,增强中职教育吸引力.中等职业教育.(23),3-4.
赵媛菊.(2001).如何适应农村经济发展需要,是发展农村职业教育的根本问题——农民及其子女对学校渗透职业教育态度的调查思考.贵州教育.(6),9-12.
植风英.(2004).社会心理学中关于社会态度改变的研究述评.贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版).(2),103-107.
郑雪.(2004).社会心理学.暨南大学出版社,119-148.
周晓虹.(1997).现代社会心理学——多维视野中的社会行为研究.上海人民出版社.267-268.
庄西真.(2003).欠发达地区中等职业教育发展的社会心理因素的调查与分析.河南职业技术师范学院学报(职业教育版).(5),32-36.
杨慧敏.(2009).大学生对婚外恋现象的内隐及外显态度的实验研究.河北师范大学.
Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Review of Psychology,52,27-58.
Banaji M.R. (2001). Implicit attitudes can be measured. In H. L. RoedigerⅢ & J. S. Nairne(Eds.),The nature of remembering:Essays in homor of Robert G. Crowder Science conference series. Washington. DC:Amerecian Psychological Association.,117-150.
Banse R, Seise J, Zerbes N.(2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift fu Experimentelle Psychologie,48,145-160.
Baron R A.Bynt D. Suls J(1988). Exploring social psychology.3th ed. Allyn andBacon,79-82
Bern, D.J.Belifes (1997), Atttitudes, and Human Affairs, Belmont, Calif: Brooks/Cole.1970. Cacioppp J T,Gardner W L, Berntson G. Beyond bipolar conceptualization and measure:the case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review,,1(1),3-25
Bertram Gawronski,Galen V. Bodenhausen.(2006). Associative and Propsitional Processes in Evalation:An Integrative Review of Implicit and Exceplicit Attitude Change,Psychological Bulletin Copyrigh,Vol.132,No.5,692-73.
Blair I. (2002).The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review,(6),242-261.
Blair I.V.(2001). Implicit Stereotypes and Prejudice. Cognitive social Psychology:On the tenure and future of social cognition, Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum,359-374.
Dasgupta N, Greenwald A G.(2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes Combating automatic prejudic with images of admired and dislike individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81(5),800-814.
De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic Affective Simon Task. Experimental Psychology. 50,77-85.
De Houwer, J., & Moors, A (2007). How to de fine and examine the implicitness of implicit measures. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwartz(Eds.), Implicit measures of attitude:Procedures and controversies(pp.179-194) New York:Guilford Press.
Dijksterhuis A. (2004). I like myself but I don't know why:Enhancing implicit self-esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,86(2),345-355.
Eagly, All & Chaiken, S.(1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. San Diego, CA:Harcourt Brace Janovich.(see especially 479-490).
Fazio, R. H., Sanbomnatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes.Joumanl of Personality and Social Psychology, SU,229-238.
Fazio R H,Olson M A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research:their meaning and us. Annual Review Psychology,54(1),297-731.
Festinger, L (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Pale Alto, CA:Stranford University Press.
Gawronski B. (2002). What Does the Implicit Association Test Measure A test of the Convergent and Discriminate Validity of Prejudice-related IATs.Exprimental Pschology,49(3),171-180
Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. (1995), Implicit social cognition:attitudes, selfesteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review.102(1),4-27.
Greenwald A G, McGhee D E, Schwartz L K. (1998) Measuring Individual differences in Implicit Cognition:The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74(6),1464-1480
Hofmann, W., Gawronski,B., Gschwendner, T.,Le,H., & Schmitt, M.A (2005). Meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31,1369-1385.
Katz D, Stotland E. A preliminary statement of a theory of attitude structure and change. In S. koch(Ed.), Psychology:A study of a science,1959(vol.3). New York:McGraw Hill Kuhnen U, Schie 1 M, Baner N, Paulig N, Phlman C Schmidthals K.How Robust is IAT Measuring and Manipulating Implicit Attitudes of East and West Germans. Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie,2001,48, 135-1244
Kawakimi, K.,Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermesn, S. & Russin. A.(2000). Just say no (to Stereptype):Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.78,871-888.
B.Keith Payne,Melissa A.Burkley,Mark B.Stokes.(2008).Why Do Implicit and Explicit Attitude Tests Dests Diverge The Role of Structural Fit, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,94(1),16.
Lowery B S, Hardin C D, Sinclair S.(2001).Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81,842-855.
McConnell A R, Leibold J M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,37,435-442
Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R.(2001).The Go/No-go Association Task. Social Cognition,19(3),625-666.
Nosek,B.A.(2005).Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,134,565-584.
A.Nosek.(2007).Implicit-Explicit Relations, Brian Current Directions in Pschology Science Volume 16-Number2,Association for Psychological Science,66.
Payne,B. K.,Cheng, S.M.,Govorun,O., Stewart,B.D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes Affect misattribution as implicit measurement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,89,277-293.
Robert.A.Baron & Byrne, (1994). Social Psychology. Allyn and Bacon,130.
Smith, E.R., & DeCoster, J. (2000) Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology:Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, (4),108-131.
Walther E, Nagengast B. (2006). Evaluative Conditioning and the Awareness Issue Assessing Contingency Awareness with the Four-Picture Recognition Test. Journal of Experimental Psychology,32(4),454-459.
Wilson T D, Lindsey S, Schooler, T Y(2000). A model of dual attitudes Psychological Review,107(1),101-126
Wittenbrink B, Judd C. M& Park B. Spontaneous prejudice in context:Variability in automatically activated attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001,8(2),815-8
