注册会计师审计质量问题研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
近年来,我国会计师事务所及注册会计师队伍不断扩大,为我国经济发展做出了应有的贡献。但是,由于注册会计师的专业胜任能力不足以及职业道德的缺失等原因,出现了琼民源、银广夏、郑百文、红光实业等许多重大的审计失败案例,给我国资本市场带来了不可估量的损失。根据财政部、证监会和审计署最近几年做出的关于注册会计师和会计师事务所的处罚公告,目前我国上市公司年报审计中存在着非常严重的问题,公众对注册会计师的信任危机日益严重,注册会计师行业的生存与发展都受到了威胁。审计质量是注册会计师行业健全发展的核心问题,怎么样才能提高我国注册会计师的审计质量成为了当前我国资本市场以及注册会计师职业界急需解决的关键问题之一。
     本文首先回顾和评价了国内外学者对审计质量的研究成果,总结了审计质量的含义和特征,强调了加强审计质量的必要性。然后,从会计师事务所、注册会计师、被审计单位和注册会计师审计环境四个方面对影响注册会计师审计质量的众多因素进行了一个比较全面和综合的分析。其次,结合我国注册会计师审计质量的现状及存在的问题,针对四个方面的影响因素,分析了我国注册会计师审计质量低下的原因:会计师事务所规模小、声誉不高、质量控制制度不健全;注册会计师的独立性不高、专业能力有限;被审计单位缺乏有效的公司治理结构;审计环境有待完善。再次,在因素分析及原因分析的基础上,提出了改善注册会计师审计质量的对策建议:推动会计师事务所做大做强、建立和健全审计质量控制体系;提高注册会计师的独立性和专业胜任能力;完善被审计单位的公司治理结构;改善注册会计师的审计环境。最后,本文对印度一家著各软件外包企业萨蒂扬公司在2009年暴露出的财务欺诈案及其来龙去脉进行了详细的解读,并分析了其财务主审普华永道会计师事务所在审计中的责任,通过案例论证印证了本文的因素分析方法和对策研究结论。
In recent years, Certified Public Accountants and the CPA firms in China have a fast growing speed and they make a due contribution to the development of economic. However, because of the lack of CPA's professional competence and the absence of professional ethics or other reasons, there have been many major audit failures which have brought immeasurable loss to China's capital market. According to the penalty notices made by the Ministry of Finance and the Audit Commission in recent years about certified public accountants and the CPA firms, there are some problems very seriously in the current annual audit of listed companies in China. The crisis of public confidence in CPA has made a huge threat to the survival and development of the CPA industry. As audit quality is the core of the sound development of the CPA industry, it becomes one of the key issues need to be resolved by the current capital market as well as CPA profession that how can we improve the quality of the CPA's audit.
     Firstly, this paper reviews and evaluates the research results of domestic and foreign scholars on the quality of audit, summers up the meaning and characteristics of audit quality and emphasizes the need to strengthen audit quality. Secondly, the paper makes a much more comprehensive and integrated analysis about many factors on the audit quality of certified public accountants from the four aspects of CPA firms, certified public accountants, the audited enterprises and the audit environment. Thirdly, on the base of the factors analysis and the status and problems of audit quality of China's CPA, this paper indicates the reasons for the low quality of audit:small CPA firms with low reputation and unperfected quality control system, absence of independence or professional capacity of certified public accountants, lack of effective corporate governance structure of the audited enterprises, and the audit environment is to be improved. Fourthly, on the base of the factors analysis above and the reasons put forward, the paper puts on some advices to improve the CPA audit quality: promoting the CPA firms to become bigger and stronger with an improved control system on the audit quality, strengthening the CPA's independence and professional competence, establishing an effective corporate governance structure for the audited enterprises, and improving the CPA's audit environment. Finally, this paper confirms the research methods of factor analysis and the conclusions of improving measures by the financial fraud case of Satyam in Indian exposed in 2009.
引文
①eAngelo, L. E. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics,1981
    ②att&Zimmerman. Agency Problems, auditing and the theory of the firm: Some evidence. Journal of Law and Eeonomic,1986
    ③litzur&Falk. Planned Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy.1996
    ① Defond Wong & Li. The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2000
    ①王跃堂,陈世敏.脱钩改制对审计独立性影响的实证研究.审计研究.2001.(3).
    ②王光远.注册会计师缘何屡陷造假旋涡,上市公司制度缺陷集重难返.现代会计.2003(1).
    ③雷光勇.证券市场审计合谋:识别与规制.中国经济出版社.2005
    ④刘丽.独立审计质量的影响因素及其改善.泰山学院学报.2007
    ⑤黄晓波,张静.上市公司审计质量现状及成因分析.当代经济.2008.1
    ①Palmrose Z. Audit Fees and Auditor Size: Further Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research.1986.24
    ①张龙平.注册会计师审计控制系统研究.东北财经大学出版社.1994
    ②叶少琴.中国上市公司注册会计师审计质量研究.中国财政经济出版社.2004
    ①中国注册会计师协会.关于推动会计师事务所做大做强的意见.2006.9.28
    ②国务院办公厅转发财政部.关于加快发展我国注册会计师行业的若十意见.2009.10.3
    [1]常勋,黄京蓄.会计师事务所质量控制.东北大学出版社.2004.6
    [2]冯均科.注册会计师审计质量控制理论研究.中国财政经济出版社.2002.6
    [3]雷光勇.证券市场审计合谋:识别与规制.中国经济出版社.2005.6
    [4]林钟高,章铁生.公司治理与公司会计.经济管理出版社.2003.10
    [5]刘明辉.高级审计研究.东北财经大学出版社.2009.5
    [6]潘琰.审计质量与审计诚信机制——基于制度与案例的思考.经济科学出版社.2006.12
    [7]孙坤.独立审计质量保证论.东北财经大学出版社.2005.6
    [8]王生根.审计实务——基于风险导向审计理念.清华大学出版社.2009.5
    [9]王英姿.注册会计师审计质量评价与控制研究.上海财经大学出版社.2002.6
    [10]谢少敏.审计学导论——审计理论入门和研究.上海财经大学出版社.2006.10
    [11]叶雪芳.舞弊审计.经济科学出版社.2008.6
    [12]陈美丽.关于当前会计师事务所审计质量的思考.中国审计.2009.11.27
    [13]李树根.对提高我国审计独立性的思考.财会月刊.2008(3)
    [14]刘峰,周福源.国际四大意味着高审计质量吗——基于会计稳健性角度的检验.会计研究.2007(3)
    [15]刘桂春,胡立新,彭海雄.审计收费与审计质量的关系研究.审计与理财.2008(1)
    [16]刘耀明,赵明元.CPA行业建设的三大现实问题.财务与会计.2004(2)
    [17]彭明真.论注册会计师不实财务报告的民事责任.法律科学.2006(5)
    [18]腾忠群.浅析注册会计师审计独立性及其在我国缺失原因.财会研究.2006(11)
    [19]汪军.上市公司审计质量研究.西南农业大学博士学位论文.2003
    [20]王广明,张奇峰.注册会计师诚信的经济学分析.会计研究.2003(4)
    [21]王建华,曹书军.从契约观看审计质量的保证机制.财会月刊.2005(8)
    [22]夏冬林.我国审计市场的竞争状况分析.会计研究.2003(3)
    [23]肖小飞.浅谈注册会计师审计质量.特区经济.2005(11)
    [24]原红旗,李海建.会计师事务所组织形式,规模与审计质量.审计研究.2003(1)
    [25]张龙平.试论会计师事务所质量控制的实施要领.会计之友.2007(4)
    [26]张奇峰,雷光勇.注册会计师审计质量的经济学分析.中南财经政法大学学报.2006(4)
    [27]赵珊.注册会计师执业环境的变化与改善对策.审计与经济研究.2005(4)
    [28]中国注册会计师协会.会计师事务所质量控制准则第5101号——业务质量控制指南.2006
    [29]周海平,吕长江.会计师事务所规模会改变投资者对审计质量的判断吗.中国会计与财务研究.2007(3)
    [30]周娜.我国独立审计准则的质量评估与完善建议.财会月刊.2007(3)
    [31]David Flint. Philosophy and Principles of Auditing. Macnillan Education LTD,1998
    [32]DeAngelo, L. E. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1981
    [33]Defond Wong & Li. The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2000
    [34]Fried, D., and A. Schiff. CPA Switches and Associated Market Reaction. The Accounting Review,1981
    [35]Lys, T. and R. L. Watts. Lawsuits against Auditors. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement),1994,32
    [36]Watts & Zimmerman. Agency problems, auditing and the theory of the firm:Some evidence. Journal of Law and Economics,1986
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.