中药制剂与平衡针针麻技术联合应用对提高肠镜检查全过程质量的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
背景和目的
     消化内镜的普及是近年来消化领域进展的一个重要方面,也是目前处理许多消化系统疾病的一项有效手段。结肠镜下治疗要求高质量肠道准备,保证操作过程顺利,减轻病人痛苦。本研究采用中药制剂与平衡针针麻技术联合应用,旨在发掘出一种更适应人文、更接近天然的新型提高肠镜检查质量的方法,促进肠镜检查及其相关治疗的发展。
     方法
     1.文献研究
     通过对国内外关于肠镜检查质量的研究现状及进展进行分析,首先,目前肠道准备多采用口服导泻法,存在清洁度差、不良反应多、患者难以耐受等诸多问题;另一方面,目前无痛肠镜检查多采用药物麻醉方法,存在各种风险及并发症,安全性差。故如何提高肠道准备质量是目前消化系统学科的一个重要课题之一
     2.临床研究
     本研究遵循随机、对照的方法,将符合纳入标准的肠镜检查患者共200例随机分为试验组(100例)和对照组(100例),试验组采用肠道准备1号方和2号方做肠道准备,并在肠镜检查过程中施以平衡针针麻技术;对照组采用番泻叶+甘露醇做肠道准备,检查过程中不进行干预。制作肠镜检查质量问卷调查表,记录患者服药后排便情况、不良反应、肠道清洁效果,以及在肠镜检查过程中平衡针的镇痛效果和患者的耐受性。建立数据库,运用统计学方法,客观地评价中药制剂与平衡针针麻技术联合应用对提高肠镜检查质量的效果。
     结果
     1.在服药口感方面,试验组与对照组的服药口感差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但中药制剂的服药口感拥有更高的患者接受程度。
     2.在服药后排便反应方面,试验组与对照组在排便持续时间和排便次数上有显著性差异(P<0.05)。试验组排便持续时间明显短于对照组,排便次数也少于对照组。两组药物的起效时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组大多于第二次服药后出现首次排便,不会影响患者睡眠,减少了患者的不便。
     3.在服药后不良反应方面,试验组和对照组不良反应发生率有统计学差异(P<0.05),对照组明显高于试验组。两组恶心、呕吐的发生率大致相当,对照组更容易出现腹胀、头晕、乏力、饥饿感。在腹痛的严重程度上,两组有着显著性差异(P<0.05),以对照组患者的腹痛程度为重。
     4.在洁肠效果方面,两组药物洁肠效果比较无显著性差异(P>0.05),试验组和对照组的洁肠效果相当。试验组的洁肠有效率(92%)高于对照组(86%)。
     5.在针麻效果方面,两组患者腹痛分级具有显著性差异(P<0.05),说明采用平衡针针麻干预后可减轻患者腹痛。患者在清醒的状态下进行检查,更能有效的避免不良并发症的发生,更具有安全性。另外,两组患者中腹胀的发生率均较高,分别达到32%、59%。经统计分析,两组患者其他不适症状的发生无明显差异(P>0.05)。
     6.在患者耐受性方面,两组患者的耐受度有明显差异(P<0.05)。试验组有52%的患者可以较舒适的完成肠镜检查,而对照组这一比例只有32%。
     结论
     本研究在分析总结近年来各种常用肠道准备方法的优势和特点的基础上,结合中医“下法”的应用特色,并将传统的针灸技术应用于肠镜检查中,旨在初步探讨如何以一种简便易行、疗效稳定、安全性高的方法提高肠镜检查质量。通过初步研究得出的结论如下:
     1.中药制剂安全性高,患者耐受性好,服药后腹痛、腹胀等不良反应发生率低。
     2.中药制剂患者排便时间短,排便次数少,不影响患者睡眠,不会引起乏力等虚脱表现。
     3.中药制剂与对照组相比较,并没有更好的洁肠效果。
     4.中药制剂的口感欠佳,和对照组一样,容易引起恶心及呕吐,但可接受度仍然高于对照组。
     5.针麻操作简便,安全性好,不存在药物麻醉的各种风险及并发症,无特殊禁忌症,可减轻患者在肠镜过程中的不适,使患者能较好地配合完成检查。
Background and Objective
     The popularity of digestive endoscopy is one of the most important progress digestion domain, currently is also an effective means to deal with many digestive disease. Colonoscopy treatment demand for high-quality bowel preparation to ensure operation process smoothly, relieve pain. This study was to dig out a new method, which is new, more humane and more natural, so that we can improve the quality and promote the therapeutical development of colonscopy, by using Chinese Medicine and technology of balance's Acupuncture.
     Methods
     1. Literature research
     According to the analysis of research situation and progress on the quality of colonoscopy both at home and abroad, we found that currently bowel preparation is used more oral cathartic method, This generates many problems: poor cleanness, more adverse reactions, poor patients s degrees; On the other hand, At present, medicinal anesthetics is the most way in painless endoscopy, there are adverse reactions of narcotic drugs and anesthetic risks, It is poor security. So how to improve the quality of colonscopy is one of the most important subjects in gastroenterology.
     2. Clinical Research
     This study abide by the random and comparing method, A total of 200 patients were randomly divided into the experimental group (n=100) and the control group (n=100). The patients from the experimental group do bowel preparation with bowel preparation 1st formula and 2nd formula, with technology of balance's Acupuncture in endoscopic checking process; and the control group do bowel preparation with senna and mannitol, No intervention in endoscopic checking process. We made unified questionnaire to evaluate the quality of colonoscopy. The patients' bowel condition, adverse reactions, cleanning effect, balance's Acupuncture effect, patients tolerated.
     Result
     1. There was no significantly different between two groups in drug taste (P>0.05), but the acceptance rate of drug taste was higher in the experimental group compared with the control group.
     2. There were significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in defecation duration and defecation frequency(P<0.05), the defecation duration of the control group was longer than the experimental group, and the total number of bowel frequency was bigger in the control group compared with the experimental group. There was another significant difference between two groups in drug effect-acting period(P<0.05), the experimental group won't affect patient Morpheus, and reduce the patients of inconvenience.
     3. The incidence of side effects was lower in the experimental group compared with the control group, there was significant difference(P<0.05). The incident of nausea, vomiting was roughly equal between two groups, but there was more abdominal distension, dizziness, weakness, hunger. The incidence of abdominal pain was significantly different between two groups(P <0.05).
     4. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the effective rate of bowel preparation (P>0.05), but the total effective rate of bowel preparation was better in the experimental group compared with the control group.
     5. There was significant different in degree of abdominal pain during endoscopic checking process (P<0.05), this shows that balance's Acupuncture Can relieve patients abdominal pain. Patients in the waking state under examination will avoid adverse events, It is safer than normal. Besides, The incidence of abdominal distension was high in two groups(32%,59%), there was no significant difference between the two groups in other side effects (P >0.05)
     6. The patients'tolerance in the experimental group was superior to that in the control group (P<0.05), more than 52 percent of patients in the experimental group can be more comfortable completed, and the proportion is 32% in the control group.
     Conclus ion
     By analyzing various common bowel preparation method's advantages and characteristics in recent years, Combined with the application of traditional Chinese medicine " diarrhea method " characteristic, The traditional acupuncture technique is applied in endoscopic check, aimed at preliminary discussion on how to enhance endoscopic check quality by a simple and feasible, efficacy stability, high security methods. Through the preliminary research conclusions are as follows:
     1. The experimental group medicine was higher safe, patients was with superior tolerability, abdominal pain, abdominal distension adverse reactions were in a low incidence.
     2. In the experimental group, Patients' defecate time is shorter, defecate total number was less, it won't affect patients, such as the lack of sleep, won't cause collapse performance.
     3. The colonic cleaning effect of experimental group is as good as control group.
     4. The experimental group medicine's mouthfeel is poor, easily cause nausea and vomiting as well as the control group, but the acceptable degrees was still higher than those in the control group.
     5. Acupuncture anesthesia's operation is simple, good safety, there is no some of risk and complications as drug anesthesia, no special contraindications, It can reduce the patients' unwell in the process of colonoscopy, so that patients can better cooperate to complete inspection.
引文
[1]陈海燕,邓彬,丁岩冰,吴健.不同肠道准备方法在结肠镜检查中的应用及护理[J].护理实践与研究,2008,5(9):47-49
    [2]Quine MA, Bell GD, McCCJoy RE, et al. Prospective audit of perforation rates following upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England. J. Br J Surg,1995,82:530
    [3]房玲,易秀芝,陈敏珍,喻理.胃肠镜检查患者心理状态的调查分析及对策[J].现代护理.2006,12(21):1969-1970
    [4]黄晓波,陈江山,姚文建,万永灵,齐国华.丙泊酚和芬太尼复合麻醉应用于无痛结肠镜检查[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2004,20(9):539
    [5]李丽.结肠镜检查前清洁肠道方法研究进展[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2008,14(24):41-42
    [6]黄山旭.电子肠镜检查前肠道准备方法的比较实验[J].中国内镜杂志,2001,7(2):78
    [7]崔淑青,金大庆.应用25%硫酸镁清洁肠道1100例体会[J].中国内镜杂志,2004,10(3):78
    [8]吴锡琛.消化道内镜术[M].南京:江苏科技出版社.1992:670
    [9]刘卫红.口服甘露醇液清洁肠道效果地探讨[J].中华护理杂志,1983,18(5):300
    [10]张岚.不同方法口服甘露醇结肠镜检肠道准备的效果观察[J].天津护理杂志,2004,12(5):295
    [11]毛淑芬,舒英.肠镜检查前肠道准备新方法探讨[J].解放军护理杂志,2009,26(3B):76
    [12]丁云珍,王骊.左半结肠癌口服甘露醇肠道准备致肠梗阻3例[J].中国内镜杂志.2002,23(3):63.
    [13]左铁,洪文元,李远华等.甘露醇清洁肠道导致肠梗阻并肠破裂一例[J].西藏医药杂志.2002,23(3):63
    [14]赵光斌,韩盛喜,刘雅玲等.结肠镜检查前集中肠道准备方法清洁效果对比观察[J].中国误诊学杂志,2003,3(9):1332-1333
    [15]尹忠元,李风辉,苏国兵.肠道准备的研究进展.护理科学杂志,2007,1(22)
    [16]冉令梅,张宝英,王咏梅.口服MgS04清洁肠道的效果观察[J].医学理论与实践.2003,16(5):547
    [17]中山医学院.药理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1981:249
    [18]冯华杨,肖生翠.3种清肠液应用于肠镜检查的效果对比分析.现代护理,2007, 13(13):1205-1206.
    [19]吴广利,崔树华.采用口服硫酸镁法做结肠镜术前肠道准备639例效果分析[J].山东医药,2002,42(22):44
    [20]丁芸珍,王骊.便秘患者结肠镜检查的肠道准备[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2002,19(3):155
    [21]李友珠.肠道清洁法的研究进展[J].护理研究.2004,18(8):1337-1338
    [22]沈惠芳.全肠道灌洗法[J].中华护理杂志,1987,22(5):218
    [23]徐禹静,吴晓芹,朱金风.老年人不同肠道准备的临床观察[J].实用护理杂志,2002,18(11):19-20
    [24]王丽娟,王新丹.口服清肠液在肠道准备中的应用和进展[J].护士进修杂志,2004,19(8):746
    [25]章红萍.口服聚乙二醇清洁肠道的临床观察[J].临床荟萃,2000,15(4):171
    [26]周丽雅,杨云生,袁耀宗等.复方聚乙二醇用于内镜检查前结肠准备的多中心随机对照临床研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2004,21(5):325-326
    [27]周平红,姚礼庆,徐美东等.聚乙二醇电解质散在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的应用[J].中国内镜杂志,2002,8(10):28-30
    [28]卢小红,杨静华.和爽(聚乙二醇电解质散)用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的效果观察[J].广东医学院学报,2007,25(4):476-477
    [29]蒋建霞,李学良,倪金良等.复方聚乙二醇电解质散在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的应用[J].中华临床医师杂志,2007,1(4):56-59
    [30]杨德庆,张涛,闫立坤等.术前用恒康正清行肠道准备与传统肠道清洁方法的比较[J].第四军医大学学报,2002,23(19):8-24
    [31]刘仁哲,李丽勤,康春艳.结肠镜检查前口服吡沙可定肠道准备的研究[J].中华临床医学研究杂志,2003年8月总第73期
    [32]王春萍,陈村龙,潘德寿等.三种不同肠道准备方法对结肠清洁效果的比较[J]第一军医大学学报,2000,20(3):276-277
    [33]季尤金,冯福才,郭敬宪等.大肠镜检查前口服吡沙可啶清洁肠道的研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,1999,16(1):56
    [34]何欢梅.比沙可啶和聚乙二醇电解质溶液在肠道准备中的应用观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2007,16(32):4777-4778
    [35]谷静,柏耀云,姚素玉等.磷酸钠口服液用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的临床观察[J].安徽医药,2008,12(7):639-641
    [36]李耀东,王一平,潘涛等.磷酸钠法与聚乙二醇电解质液法在结肠镜检前肠道准备中应用效果的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(7):555-561
    [37]陈冉.中药用于腹部手术肠道准备的研究[J].齐鲁护理杂志.2001,7(6):401- 402
    [38]解基良,吴咸中,伍孝先等.三承气汤冲剂用于肠道准备的研究[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,1998,4(2):79-82
    [39]田旭东,张学军,张参军.大承气汤在结肠镜检查前清洁肠道150例观察[J].甘肃中医.1999,12(6):28-29
    [40]王实,赵秋枫,陈军贤等.增液承气汤在老年患者结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的应用[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志,2007,15(1):52-53
    [41]张烁,吕宾,江丽萍等.老年人结肠镜检查肠道清洁方法比较观察[J].世界华人消化杂志,2005,13(13):1624-1626
    [42]孟庆菊,丁春香,孙兴亮.番泻叶用于结肠镜肠道准备的效果观察[J].中华综合医学杂志,2005,6(7):589
    [43]陈礼明,刘圣,陈象清等.肠必清清洁肠道的效果及治疗便秘的疗效[J].药物与临床,1999,10(1):32-33
    [44]卓越,洪花,周苇.复方番泻液在清洁肠道中的应用[J].福建中医药,1998,29(5):29
    [45]麦卫阳,黄穗娟,梁庆辉等.中药协定处方在纤维结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的作用[J].实用医学杂志,1996,12(9):625-626
    [46]王文文,钱雁飞等.行气通便汤在便秘患者肠镜检查前肠道准备中的作用[J].实用中医药杂志,2006,22(11):669
    [47]吕竞竞,陶文洲,李士德等.加减大黄附子汤在结肠镜检前肠道准备中德的应用[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1992;12(1):45-46
    [48]朱晓义,关景义,李茁然等.口服芒硝用于大肠镜检前清洁肠道的研究[J].中华医学写作杂志,2002,9(19):1549-1550
    [49]李志君.大黄制剂用于肠道准备的临床观察[J].护理研究,2002,16(3):153-154
    [50]苏志文,杨连春.番泻叶口服液与蓖麻油清肠效果的比较[J].空军总医院学报,1994,1(57):10
    [51]黄爱月,陈秋连,徐宝珠,李素萍.口服蓖麻油代替清洁灌肠在结肠镜检查的临床观察研究[J].国际医药卫生导报,2007,13(12):58-60
    [52]杨丽云,刘玉民,王琳等.口服蓖麻油加洗肠粉代替灌肠的临床效果观察[J].河南诊断治疗杂志.2002,16(3):231-232
    [53]徐富星,季大年.无痛苦消化内镜技术临床应用现况[J].中国实用内科杂志,2005,25:221-222
    [54]董敏.异丙酚不良反应综述[J].药物流行病学杂志,1999,8(2):84286
    [55]陆美林.无痛胃肠镜检查并发症原因分析及护理[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2007, 28(14):1767
    [56]何锋,翟珠妹,曹泮悬等.针麻在结肠镜检查中的应用[J].上海针灸杂志,1999,18(5):25
    [57]杜艳军,孙国杰.结肠镜检前针刺合谷对镜检的影响[J].上海针灸杂志,2002,21(4):20-21
    [58]陈英,罗焕运,刘淑慧等.电子结肠镜检查使用针刺镇痛的研究[J].护理学杂志,2002,17(2):86-88
    [59]王文远.平衡针灸实用技术.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006,第一版:45-56
    [60]徐国峰,李敏,覃小兰.平衡针疗法治疗急性腹痛63例[J].中国针灸,2007,27(2):155-156
    [61]王业龙.阳陵泉穴止痛新探[J].光明中医,2007,22(1):39-40
    [62]王凌鸿.肾绞痛针刺阳陵泉出现经络感传1例报导[J].井冈山学院学报,2006,27(6):135
    [63]何智明,杜瑚,叶少梅.针刺足三里、阳陵泉和对照点对人体肠鸣音的影响[J].新中医,1979,6:45-47
    [64]喻晓春,宋利明,马慧敏等.电针“足三里”及“阳陵泉”对腹腔神经节节后纤维放电影响的比较[J].针刺研究,1996,21(1):49-51
    [65]王俊.督脉导气法治疗抑郁症睡眠障碍的探讨[J].针灸临床杂志,2006,22(3):33-34
    [66]徐非,赵青春,陈杰等.督脉穴埋线治疗癫痫60例疗效观察[J].中国针灸,1993,13(6):25
    [67]杜岁增,乔新泽,魏丽.针刺百会穴治疗精神病42例[J].国医论坛,1990,(2):29
    [68]陈丽仪,郭元琦.不寐证针灸治疗新思路口[J].针灸临床杂志,2004,20(10):20-21
    [69]宋媛,赵仓焕,朱小华.从督脉论治失眠症[J].四川中医,2005;23(12):11-12
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.