多机并车系统方案研究与选型设计
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着高新科技迅猛发展,涉及船舶方面的很多理论研究已日臻完善。但船舶动力装置在实际运行过程中工况多变,实船上各种性能实测研究很复杂;国内外均采用理论研究、台架试验和实船测试相结合的方法来研究动力装置的各种性能;国内的多机并车研究很少;我国在船舶电力推进系统研究及应用方面起步较晚,相关的设计与制造方面与发达国家还有很大差距;柴油机多机并车联合动力装置适合我国国情;船舶动力装置现代化人才培养要求有良好的教学实验条件,应船舶发展的需要拟建多机并车试验台架。动力装置试验台架的设计一般都是根据经验,从科学角度来综合评估的比较少,本文引用了模糊综合评判法来进行多机并车试验台的设计和研究。
     本文以多机并车试验台架为研究对象,在设计研制试验台架时,首先考虑到其功能要求、设计原则、性能指标、国内外同类型试验台架现有水平和发展概况等,在总结现有可借鉴的船舶设计经验的基础上,提出了不同的多机并车系统试验台架设计方案;考虑试验台架的影响因素,建立了多机并车系统方案评价指标体系,针对评价指标体系的特点,研究了群组层次分析法和模糊综合评价方法,进而确定了最佳设计方案。此外还选取了满足系统功能要求的部分设备。
     在进行综合评判时,首先构建了多机并车系统评判的递阶层次结构模型,利用改进的AHP(层次分析法)来计算模型中各指标的权重,在计算过程中,将改进的群组AHP方法应用到了群组判断矩阵的集结问题中,实现了专家意见的有效融合。而后完成模型中指标的定性、定量划分,在指标隶属度的确定问题上,定性指标选用了模糊隶属度的方法,对于定量指标,结合相关规范,确定了合理的隶属函数。在权重与隶属度均确定的基础上,选择适合本问题的模糊综合评判模型,运用MATLAB软件,计算得最终的评价结果,实现了方案的选优。
     本文是模糊综合评价方法在多机并车试验台系统方案优选中应用的一次探讨,旨在为试验台架方案的优选提供一种科学合理的方法,进而建立最佳的试验台。
With the rapid development of high technology, lots of theoretical researches involving ship have been getting more sophisticated. During the actual operation process, ship power plant working conditions are inconstant; Environmental influence is significant; Various properties measuring study are very complex; At home and abroad, methods combining with theoretical research, bench testing and shiphoard measurement are being used to study various performances of ship power plant; Researches of multi-power combine system is few; Researches and application of electric ship power system are later in domestic, design and manufacture related having great gap from developed nation; CODAD combined power plant can adapt to the situation of our country; The construction of testing benches was often based on the experience or the requirement of ship-owner, not enough work has be done for making comprehensive programme evaluation scientifically. An important reason for cultivating a person of talant in modem society is better experiment condition, to satisfy the ship development multi-power combine system test bench will be setted up. Here, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is brought in to carry on the research for multi-power combine system design selection and optimization.
     In this paper, multi-power combine system design selection and research is considered as the object, in the design of the development of test bench, the factors taked into account are their functional requirements, design principles, performance indicators, the current development level at home and abroad, and so on. At the basis of the conclusion of the existing design experiences in ship, this paper brings forward different multi-power combine system designs, and sets up an evaluation index system for these projects combing with the characteristics of the test bench, then contraposing evaluation system characteristics, carrys on an investigation into Group AHP Method and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation methods; Finally, the best design is determined by using comprehensive evaluation method. In addition, several of equipments meet the system requirements are selected.
     During comprehensive evaluating process, firstly, analytic hierarchy structure model is established to evaluate the multi-power combine system and the categorization of quantified index and qualitative index is finished. Secondly, ameliorative AHP is used to calculate absolute weight of the index in the model. Group AHP Method is adopted to solve the assembled problem, achieving the fusion of experts' opinions. As for the problem of index membership, reasonable membership function is established, by characters analyzing and correlative rules combining. After finishing the calculation of weight and membership, proper fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model is chosen. Using Mat Lab software, the evaluation result is gained. And finally the project selection is completeed.
     This thesis does another research on the application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation on marine project selection, in order to provide a scientific method for the selection of multi-power combine system.
引文
[1]李晓通.CODAD联合动力装置控制规律的仿真与实验研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学动力机械及工程系,2001
    [2]安士杰,陈国钧,汉宝.水面舰艇主动力装置发展展望[J].武汉造船,2000.131(2):11-13
    [3]Anon.RENK:Specialist in combined marine propulsion plants.Marine Structures,v 55,n 12,December,2006,p 46
    [4]Jost,Volker.Combined propulsion plants for high speed yachts[J].Diesel & Gas Turbine Worldwide,v24,n 5,Jun,1992,2p
    [5]C G Hodge BSc MSc CEng FIMarEST.Modem Applications of Power Electronics to Marine Propulsion Systems[J].IEEE Int Symp Power Semocond Dev Ics ISPSD,June 2002,p9-16
    [6]徐筱欣,王天荣,邹春平.动力装置综合试验台设计思想分析[J].实验室研究与探索,1994,39(1):62-65
    [7]Ma Fong Yuan,Electric Propulsion Gains More Ship in Future[J.IMECE'2003.105-109
    [8]Hodge,C.G.Modern applications of power electronics to marine propulsion systems.Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.2002,p 9-16
    [9]Anon.Economics of the CODMAE propulsion concept.Naval Architect,n APR,April,2003,p 24-28
    [10]Anon.Synergy in ship propulsion-A CODMAE plant for efficient,flexible,and redundant operation.Naval Architec,n MAR,March,2003,p 23-33
    [11]Anon.CODED achinery:An advanced concept for next-generation cruise ships.Naval Architect,2003,p 11-13
    [12]周晓洁.基于模糊综合评价法的船舶热源系统优选研究[D].上海:上海交通大学船舶海洋与建筑工程学院,2008
    [13]Webster,James S.;Fireman,Howard;Allen,Dillon A.;Mackenna,Adrian J.;Hootman,John C.Alternative propulsion methods for surface combatants and amphibious warfare ships.Trans Soc Nav Archit Mar Eng.2007,v115,p224-262
    [14]吕庭豪.船舶动力装置设计方案的模糊综合评判[J].华中理工大学学报,1990,18(1):121-126
    [15]杨承参,施润华.船舶动力装置[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,1996:232-258
    [16]敖晨阳,陈华清,曾凡明.舰船全柴并车后传动装置定量分析研究[J].舰船科学技术,2002,24(6):26-29
    [17]吴晓平,汪玉.舰船装备系统综合评估的理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2007:67-69,323
    [18]陈国均,曾凡明.现代舰船轮机工程[M].湖南:国防科技大学出版社,2001:17-23,688
    [19]曾凡明,敖晨阳,陈国钧等.CODAD后传动装置的配置和评估优化[J].海军工程大学学报,2002,14(4):32-36
    [20]赵焕臣.层次分析法—一种简易的新决策方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1986:2-28
    [21]金一冰.内河推船动装设计特点及主机选型讨论[J].船海工程,2002,3:30-32
    [22]于洪亮,段树林,陈刚.船用主机的选型[J].大连海事大学学报,2004,30(4):23-26
    [23]安士杰,王昌一,吴晓平.舰艇主机评估体系中的权重的群决策[J].海军工程大学学报,2000.95(6):49-52
    [24]李鹏,安士杰.舰艇柴油机主机最优化评估方法[J].船舶,2001,2:50-52
    [25]方涌奎.变频电动机简介[J].精密制造与自动化,2002,3:16-19
    [26]邹志勇,陈链冰,林文生.机械设备选型方案的模糊综合评价[J].建设机械技术与管理2005,4:89-94
    [27]索再萍.部队基本卫生装备选型方法与选型系统设计[D].中国人民解放军军事医学科学院,2007
    [28]杨永清,许先云.改进的层次分析法用于矿井安全管理的综合评价[J].系统工程理论与实践,1999,6:121-125
    [29]Jon Landeta.Current validity of the DelPhi method in social sciences[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2006.6.Volume73,Issue5,467-482
    [30]He-Yan Kang and Amy H.I.Lee.Priority mix planning for semiconductor Fabrication by fuzzy AHP ranking[J].Expert Systems with Applications,In Press,Corrected Proof,Available online 13 February 2006.
    [31]Vietor B.Kreng and Chao-Yi Wu.Evaluation of knowledge Portal Development tools using a fuzzy AHP approach:The case of Taiwanese stone Industry[J].European Journal of Operational Research,In Press,Corrected Proof,Available online 25 January 2006.
    [32]秦波涛,李增华.改进层次分析法用于矿井安全性综合评价[J].西安科技学院学报,2002,22(2):126-129
    [33]Xu Z,Wei C.A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1999,116(2):P443-449
    [34]徐南荣,仲伟俊.科学决策理论与方法[M].南京:东南大学出版社,1995:228-231
    [35]C.T.Chen.A fuzzy approach to select the location of the distribution center[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2001,p65-73
    [36]Kuo,Ying-Feng;Chen,Pang-Cheng.Selection of mobile value-added services for system operators using fuzzy synthetic evaluation.Expert Systems with Applications,v 30,n 4,May,2006,p 612-620
    [37]Pedrycz W.Fuzzy Control and Fuzzy System[M].New York:Res Stud Press,1993,46-67
    [38]Wang,Xiaoyi;Hou,Chaozhen;Yuan,Jumei;Liu,Zaiwen.An AHP-fuzzy synthetic evaluation model based on evidence theory.Computer Science,v 4114 LNAI-Ⅱ,Computational Intelligence International Conference on Intelligent Computing,ICIC 2006,Proceedings,2006,p 108-113
    [39]胡永宏,贺思辉.综合评价方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:167-199
    [40]邱东.多指标综合评价方法的系统分析[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1991:21-43
    [41]叶义成,柯丽华,黄德育.系统综合评价技术及其应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2006:18-24
    [42]孙海霞,赵文,赵文赞.地铁车站施工方案模糊决策研究[J].沈阳工业大学学报,2003,25(5):437-440
    [43]丁静.基于群组层次分析法的配送中心配送绩效评价的研究[D].合肥:合肥工业大学管理科学与工程,2004
    [44]邹家驹.基于改进的层次分析法的钢桁架安装方案优选[D].重庆:重庆大学土木工程学院,2006
    [45]陈孝国.机械设备评估模糊综合评价数学模型[J].煤矿机械,2004,8:52-53
    [46]苏为华.多指标综合评价理论与方法问题研究[D].厦门:厦门大学,2000
    [47]Yang Jianbo,Sen Pratyush.A general multi-level E-valuation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty.IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man and Cyber-netics,1994,24(10):1458-1472
    [48]http://www.ynchai.com.cn/cpzt/Y0303index_l.htm
    [49]http://www.weichai.com/
    [50]王兴廉,瞿云,顾平.内燃机测试中水力测功器的选择[J].车用发动机,1992,5:48-50
    [51]http://www.cegongqi.com/download.htm
    [52]安玉昌,陈国钧,吴杰长.舰船柴油主机双机并车功率均衡控制技术[J].海军工程大学学报,2003,15(3):58-61
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.