针刺非痉挛侧穴位和痉挛侧穴位对脑卒中后痉挛偏瘫的临床研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:探讨分别以强刺激、弱刺激方法针刺痉挛侧、非痉挛侧穴位治疗脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫肌力、痉挛程度、肢体功能活动及日常生活能力的影响。
     方法:符合脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫诊断标准和纳入标准的患者120例,随机分为四组,分别为针刺痉挛侧穴位强刺激组、针刺痉挛侧穴位弱刺激组和针刺非痉挛侧穴位强刺激组、针刺非痉挛侧穴位弱刺激组各30例,非痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激组上肢均取肩髃、臂臑、天井、四渎、外关、阳溪、偏历、中渚;下肢均取殷门、阴包、足三里、绝骨、申脉、丘墟、足临泣,针刺手法以平补平泻法。强刺激捻转角度大于180度,提插深度大于0.5cm;弱刺激捻转角度小于90度,提插深度小于0.3cm。痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激组上肢均取极泉、尺泽、曲泽、曲池、手三里、内关、大陵、劳宫;下肢均取髀关、伏兔、委中、承山、三阴交、太溪、照海、涌泉。强刺激和弱刺激方法同前述,每日1次,每6天休息1天,4周为1疗程,一疗程后观察疗效。评价指标采用Robert Lovett法评测肌力,采用改良Ashworth评分法和临床痉挛指数评测痉挛程度,采用简化Fugl-Meyer评定量表的测定肢体运动功能,采用日常生活能力Barthel指数来评定日常生活能力。
     结果:1.研究发现非痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激组和痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激组患者的上、下肢肌力均有一定改善,治疗后较治疗前有显著性差异(P<0.05),但是四种治疗方法之间未见明显差异(P>0.05)。2.研究发现上下肢非痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激组治疗前后Ashworth评分有显著性差异(P<0.05),痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激组治疗前后Ashworth评分无明显差异(P>0.05)。组间比较发现治疗后非痉挛侧穴位弱刺激组Ashworth评分明显小于痉挛侧穴位强刺激组与弱刺激组(P<0.05),非痉挛侧穴位强刺激组治疗后较痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激组的Ashworth评分也显著减轻(P<0.05)。治疗前后差值的组间比较发现,非痉挛侧穴位强刺激与弱刺激两组均较痉挛侧穴位强刺激和弱刺激两组有显著性差异(P<0.05或0.01),非痉挛侧穴位强刺激与弱刺激两组治疗前后的差值无显著性差异(P>0.05)。3.研究发现上下肢非痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激组CSI较治疗前显著降低(P<0.05),痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激组治疗前后未见显著性差异(P>0.05)。治疗后4组比较发现,非痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激组较痉挛侧穴位强刺激组、痉挛侧穴位弱刺激组2组CSI均显著降低。治疗前后差值比较发现,非痉挛侧穴位强刺激与弱刺激两组均较痉挛侧穴位强刺激和弱刺激两组有显著性差异(P<0.05),非痉挛侧穴位弱刺激组与非痉挛侧穴位强刺激比较未见有显著性差异(P>0.05)。4.研究提示治疗后非痉挛侧穴位强刺激组、弱刺激组与非痉挛侧穴位强刺激组、弱刺激组四组的FM计分明显高于治疗前(P<0.05)。治疗前后的差值比较,4组未见显著性差异(P>0.05)。表明4组在改善肢体运动功能方面效果基本相当。5.研究提示非痉挛侧穴位强刺激组、弱刺激组与痉挛侧穴位强刺激组、弱刺激组四组治疗后ADL评分均较治疗前ADL明显提高(P<0.05),治疗后4组患者的ADL未见明显差异(P>0.05)。治疗前后的差值比较发现,4组未见显著性差异(P>0.05)。
     结论:非痉挛侧穴位强刺激组、弱刺激组与痉挛侧穴位强刺激组、弱刺激组四组均可以改善肌力、FM评分、日常生活能力评分,但四组之间差异无统计学意义。针刺非痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激组治疗前后在临床痉挛指数、Ashworth评分较其他组有明显改善。针刺非痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激均能改善脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫的痉挛程度,能降低肌张力,而且弱刺激、强刺激未见明显差异。而针刺痉挛侧穴位强、弱刺激治疗前后临床痉挛指数、Ashworth评分未见明显改善,强、弱刺激之间也未见明显差别。4种不同方法对痉挛性偏瘫的肢体活动能力、日常生活能力、肌力均能起到改善作用,但是4种方法之间肢体活动能力、日常生活能力、肌力比较未见明显差别。研究证实针刺非痉挛侧穴位穴位可能减低肢体肌张力。
Objective: To study the impact of myodynamia, spasm degree, limb function and activities of daily living of hemiplegia spasm after a stroke treated by acupuncture Spasm side and Non-Spasm side point respectively in the strong and weak way.
     Methods: 120 cases of the patients conformed to spastic hemiplegia After the stroke diagnostic criteria and inclusion criteria were randomly divided into four groups, namely the acupuncture spasm side group respectively by the strong and weak way and the acupuncture non-spasm side group respectively in the strong and weak way. The two non-spasm side groups stimulates Jianyu, Binao, Tianjing, Sidu, Waiguan, Yangxi, Pianli, Zhongzhu on the upper limbs ;lower limbs were admitted Yinmen, Yinbao, Zusanli, Juegu, Shenmai, Qiuxu,, Qiuxu, Zulinqi. Needle method is used by normal reinforcement and normal reduction. Strong stimulation is that holding-twisting angle is more than 180 degrees and the inserted depth greater than 0.5 cm; weak stimulation is that holding-twisting angle is less than 90 degrees and the inserted depth less than 0.3 cm; Both spasm side groups stimulates Jiquan, Chize, Quze, Quchi, Shousanli, Neiguan, Daling, Laogong on the upper limbs; lower limbs were admitted Biguan, Futu, Weizhong,, Chenshan, Sanyinjiao, Zhaohai, Yongquan . Strong and weak stimulation is as foregoing. Once a day, every six days rest one day, four weeks for a course of treatment, the efficacy is evaluated after a course of treatment. Myodynamia is evaluated by Robert Lovett measure, with improved Ashworth score and clinical spasm index muscular tone is evaluated, simplified Fugl-Meyer scale is used to evaluate limbs function, and Barthel index is used to evaluate activities of daily living.
     Results: 1. Both the strong or weak non-spasm side stimulation and the strong or weak spasm side stimulation can improve Myodynamia, and there is significantly difference after treatment than before treatment (P< 0.05) , but no significant difference among the four groups(P> 0.05). 2. There is significantly difference of ashworth scale in the strong and weak non-spasm side groups after treatment than before treatment (P< 0.05), but no significantly difference in the strong and weak spasm side groups after treatment than before treatment (P>0.05). ashworth scales of both strong and weak non-spasm side groups is better than strong and weak spasm side groups. The difference of discrepancy is significant before and after the treatment in spasm side groups and non-spasm side groups (P <0.05 or 0.01). There is no significantly difference between the strong and weak non-spasm side groups (P> 0.05). 3.the CSI scale of the strong and weak stimulation non-spasm side groups on the upper and lower limb reduced significantly than before treatment (P <0.05). There is no significant difference in the the strong and weak stimulation spasm side groups before and after treatment. (P> 0.05). Among 4 groups, the CSI scale of the two non-spasm side groups is lower than the two spasm side groups after treatment. The difference of discrepancy is significant before and after the treatment in stimulated- spasm side groups and stimulated non-spasm side groups (P <0.05). There is no significantly difference between the strong and weak stimulated non-spasm side groups (P> 0.05). 4. The FM scale of the two non-spasm side groups and the two spasm side groups is higher than s before treatment (P <0.05) . There is no significant difference of discrepancy before and after treatment P >0.05). That means all groups can improve the limbs function. 5. The ADL scale of the two non-spasm side groups and the two spasm side groups is higher than before treatment (P <0.05) . There is no significant difference of discrepancy before and after treatment (P >0.05). that means all groups can improve the limbs function.
     Conclusion: All the four groups can improve myodynamia, FM scale, ADL scale, but no significant difference among each other. The CSI scale and ashworth scale is improved significantly in Acupuncture non-spasm side groups by strong and weak stimulation, but the other two insignificantly. Acupuncturing non-spasm side by strong and weak stimulation both can improve spasm and decrease muscular tone, but no significant difference between strong and weak stimulation. The four methods all can improve limbs function, activaties daily life, myodynamia, but no significant difference among four methods. The study of acupuncture points non-spasm side may reduce the limb muscle tension.
引文
[1]黄永禧,徐本华,黄真.运动再学习方法的新进展[J].中国康复理论与实践,2000;6(3):97-101.
    [2]周纪东,喻晓蔚.GABAA受体的神经药理学研究进展[J].生命的化学,2002;22(2):160-162.
    [3]李华,左伋.GABAB受体及其临床意义[J].国外医学·生理、病理科学与临床分册,2000;20(6):458-460.
    [4]张志琴,李春霞,王丽凤,等.P物质对GABAA受体介导电流的作用[J].石河子大学学报(自然科学版),2003;7(3):177-1819.
    [5]娄必丹,刘伍立.泻阴补阳法论治脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪[J].针灸临床杂志,2002;18(12):1-2.
    [6]娄必丹,章薇,刘智,等.张力平衡针法对脑卒中痉挛瘫痪患者血脂和血糖的调节作用[J].中国康复,2006;21(2):81-82.
    [7]岳增辉,刘伍立,姜京明.肢体痉挛的针灸治疗及功能评定[J].中国康复医学杂志,2002;17(3):177-178.
    [8]于学平,滕秀英,孟玉泉.经筋刺法治疗中风上肢体痉挛状态临床疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2004;20(4):20-22.
    [9]刘伍立,欧阳建军,岳增辉,等.针刺治疗脑卒中后肢体痉挛瘫痪的思路与方法[J].中国针灸,2003;23(6):361-362
    [10]李德宽,裴方方.体针透穴治疗中风后遗症[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2007;9(3):121.
    [11]孙世晓,武桂娟.滞针兼透刺疗法治疗中风肢体痉挛状态临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2006;22(6):37-38.
    [12]张立涛.泻阴补阳针刺法治疗中风痉挛性瘫痪的临床观察[J].内蒙古中医药,2007;4:34-35.
    [13]海英,于潇.针刺治疗脑卒中痉挛性运动障碍[J].中国针灸,2007;27(10):735-737.
    [14]卢佩斯,庄礼兴.阴阳配合刺法治疗脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫[J].中国临床康复,2006;10(7):128-131.
    [15]王丽平,周炜,张树源.头体针治疗脑血管病后痉挛性瘫痪的疗效评价与研究[J].上海针灸杂志,2007;26(7):3-5.
    [16]曹辰虹,赵建国.针刺锥体交叉区预防中风偏瘫痉挛状态的临床观察[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2007:5(11):1050-1051.
    [17]陈立典,郭晓琳,陶静,等.针刺治疗结合肌力训练对脑卒中后偏瘫患者步行能力的影响[J].中国康复医学杂志,2006;21(2):136-139.
    [18]徐晓红,郑鹏,王富春.三种头针体系的疗效比较与分析[J].吉林中医药,2007;27(4):47-48.
    [19]李静铭.试谈阴经穴在针灸治疗中风偏瘫中的作用[J].江苏中医,2000;21(8):9.
    [20]米建平,张中成.阴经电针疗法降低中风偏瘫肢体肌张力疗效观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2003;22(10):7-8.
    [21]姜桂美,贾超.针刺拮抗肌与主动肌治疗中风后痉挛性偏瘫的临床疗效观察[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2007;5(9):812-813.
    [22]郭小云.电针配合穴位埋线治疗中风后上肢偏瘫肢体痉挛34例[J].湖南中医杂志,2006:22(4):41.
    [23]张淑杰,高维滨.电针治疗脑卒中痉挛性偏瘫的临床研究[J].针灸临床杂志,2006;22(11):36-38.
    [24]章薇.针刺阳陵泉为主治疗痉挛性瘫痪52例临床观察[J].中级医刊,1999;34(3):52.
    [25]雎明河.针刺手少阳经穴治疗中风后上臂痉挛的临床观察[J].针刺研究,2001;26(2):131.
    [26]王秋云.按期分经电针法治疗中风后偏瘫疗效观察[J].中国针灸,2006;26(1):33-35.
    [27]于学平,齐欢,黄昕.电针夹脊穴治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态临床疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2007;23(10):21-23.
    [28]高洁,欧阳八四.恢刺加电针对中风患者痉挛状态缓解的临床观察[J].湖南中医杂志,2007,23(6):3-4.
    [29]金远林,王海燕,周启棣,等.祛瘀生新针法治疗中风后肢体痉挛52例临床观察[J].光明中医,2006;21(3):40-41.
    [30]訾明杰,刘志顺,刘保延.试论中风后痉挛性瘫痪病机及针灸取穴原则[J].针刺研究,2006;31(6)365-368.
    [31]郭志玲.针药并举治疗中风痉挛瘫痪46例临床观察[J].淮海医药,2000;18(2):115-116.
    [32]朱国祥,包烨华,纪晨彤,等.针灸结合中药湿热敷治疗中风后上肢高痉挛状态[J].针灸临床杂志,2004;20(6):17-18.
    [33]许益强.活血化瘀法治疗脑梗死后肢体痉挛100例[J].实用中医内科杂志,2002;16(4):232.
    [34]李响.香丹穴位注射治疗脑卒中偏瘫后上肢痉挛的临床研究[J].中国康复理论与 实践,2002;8(9):525,549.
    [35]齐红梅.针药结合治疗偏瘫痉挛手疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2004;20(6):13-15.
    [36]秦润笋,赵子龙.中医综合康复疗法治疗中风后肌张力增高疗效观察[J].辽宁中医杂志,2006;33(11):1456-1457
    [37]吴红专,朱文宗.抗挛合剂治疗中风偏瘫后肌痉挛的临床观察[J].湖北中医杂志,2002;24(5):10
    [38]黄培新,卢明,蔡业峰,等.舒筋颗粒治疗脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫疗效观察[J].中国康复理论与实践,2003;9(12):728-729.
    [39]张艳霞,刘岩,卢仁彬.中西医结合治疗痉挛性偏瘫临床体会[J].中国中医急症,2007:16(5):611.
    [40]谭爱玲,吕端.养阴柔肝通络法治疗缺血性中风后痉挛30例临床观察[J].江苏中医药,27(8):24-25.
    [41]杨标,曲建平.中药内服外用对脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫的疗效观察[J].辽宁中医杂志,2006:33(11):1430.
    [42]陈慧敏.巴氯酚对脑血管病早期康复作用的临床观察[J].浙江临床医学,2000;2(5):304.
    [43]秦绍森,张晓燕,罗盛,等.巴氯酚在中风后期的临床应用研究[J].脑与神经疾病杂志,2001;9(2):93-94
    [44]姚金荣,王东生,倪新宝,等.巴氯酚并康复训练对脑卒中患者痉挛性偏瘫的治疗效应[J].中国临床康复,2004;8(10):1814-1815
    [45]杨振中,冯文娜.乙哌立松结合康复疗法治疗中风后肌痉挛[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2006;4(6):489-490.
    [46]赵冬林.肌痉挛的局部注射治疗[J].国外医学·物理医学与康复医学分册,1995;15(2):8.
    [47]周红俊,汪家琮,刘根林.酚注射对肌痉挛的解痉疗效观察[J].中国康复理论与实践,1997;3(2):66-68.
    [48]欧海宁,詹乐昌,农文恒,等.舒筋活络洗剂联合型肉毒毒素注射对中风后踝跖屈肌痉挛的影响[J].世界中医药,2007;4(2):215-217.
    [49]胡利华,许红力.肌皮神经酒精注射治疗中风后肘部屈曲痉挛[J].国外医学·物理医学与康复学分册,2000;20(4):177-178.
    [50]郭峰,赵云富,姜晓钟,等.辣椒素局部用药对初级传入神经和P物质的影响[J].第二军医大学学报,2002;23(4):423-426.
    [51]钱书森,余晓英,徐承焘.辣椒素治疗截瘫后下肢肌紧张度增高的实验研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,1999;5(2):57-60.
    [52]Coffey JR,Cahill D.Steers W,et al.Intrathecal baclofen for intractable spasticity of spinal origin:results of a long-teen multicenter study[J].J Neurosurg 1993;78(2):226-32.
    [53]Gibson SJ,McGregor G,Bloom SR,et al.Local application of capsaicin to one sciatic nerve of the adult rat induce a marked depletion in the peptide content of the lumber dorsal horn[J].Neuroscience 1982;7(12):3153-3162.
    [54]郭万字.《理疗学》[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,第一版,1984:121.
    [55]颜华,喻佩君,段华林,等.痉挛肌治疗仪配合运动治疗痉挛型瘫痪90例[J].中国临床康复,2003;7(10):1590.
    [56]陈眉,侯群,汪龙元,等.脑反射治疗仪改善中风后肌张力增高30例[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1999;19(2):113.
    [57]郭宝娟,张忠亮.运动刺激疗法为主降低偏瘫肢体肌张力疗效观察[J].按摩与导引,1999;15(1):55.
    [58]赵旸,梁松,刘洪涛.肌电引导注射A型肉毒素治疗脑性瘫痪下肢肌张力障碍14例[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2004;19(4):310-311.
    [59]王丽梅,马艳辉,赵振峰.应用KX-3A型痉挛肌治疗仪治疗痉挛的临床疗效观察[J].黑龙江医药科学,2003;26(5):80.
    [60]燕铁斌,Hui-Chan CWY.经皮穴位电神经刺激对急性脑卒中偏瘫患者踝关节肌张力及协同收缩率的影响[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2007;,29(1):25-28.
    [61]李积荣,苗建亭,宿长军.脑卒中患者运动疗法治疗前后的肌张力分析[J].中国临床康复,2003;7(1):58-59.
    [62]全国第四届脑血管病学术会议通过.各类脑血管疾病诊断要点.中国实用内科杂志,1997,17(5):312
    [63]中华全国中医学会内科学会.中风病中医诊断、疗效评定标准.中国医药学报,1986,1(2):56-57
    [64]杨兆民主编.刺法灸法学.上海科学技术出版社,1996年1月第一版:32
    [65]王玉龙主编.康复评定.人民卫生出版社,2000年8月第一版:88
    [66]燕铁斌,窦祖林主编.实用瘫痪康复.人民卫生出版社,1999年11月第一版:112
    [67]燕铁斌.临床痉挛指数:痉挛的综合临床评定[J].现代康复,2000;4(1):88-89
    [68]王玉龙主编.康复评定.人民卫生出版社,2000年8月第一版:181-187
    [69]王玉龙主编.康复评定.人民卫生出版社,2000年8月第一版:292-293
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.