N对桉树生长的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
桉树连栽引起的立地衰退制约了速生人工丰产林的发展,因此,如何有效地提高人工林的产量、改善林地土壤肥力是当前林业生产中急需解决的问题。本论文研究在广东雷州半岛进行了桉树-相思的混交和N施肥试验,旨在研究混交和施肥后林地土壤养分的变化、养分和树木生长的关系;同时在广东、广西选择了4个不同的立地条件进行施肥研究,进一步探索桉树在不同的立地、不同的施肥条件下的生长情况,为合理施肥提供依据。本文得出的结论如下:
     1 桉树、相思混交后不同的混交方式其凋落枝、叶以及总量都有不同的差异。其中以桉树纯林的凋落枝最大,达4.818t/hm~2yr,以相思纯林的凋落叶最大,达17.73t/hm~2yr。凋落物总量以相思纯林最大,桉树纯林最小,其余各混交方式差别不大。单位重量的凋落枝、叶的养分含量以相思叶含N量最大,U6枝最小,分别为11.18g/kg、4.44gkg。P、K、B都以桉树叶最大,分别为0.96g/kg、0.31g/kg、64.85mg/kg。从N、P、K、B总量来看,相思纯林含K量最大、1株桉树1株相思混交含P最大外,1行桉树1行相思混交含N、B最大。桉树凋落枝多,相思凋落叶多这种生理特性以及两者的混交方式决定了各混交处理凋落物、养分含量的差异,以1株桉树1株相思、1行桉树1行相思混交效果较好。凋落物能增加林地有机质含量,有利于提高林地土壤肥力。
     2 相思纯林土壤中的硝态氮、氨态氮、有效K含量均最大,桉树纯林土壤中有效P的含量最大,1株桉树1株相思、1行桉树1行相思混交各养分含量相差不大。因此桉树与相思混交,能提高林地土壤N供应能力,对改良土壤养分、维持林地长期生产力有一定的作用。
     3 桉树、相思混交方式不同导致了其树高、胸径、单株蓄积量的差异,但总蓄积量各混交方式没有明显相差。桉树纯林的林分总蓄积量比1行桉树
    
     中文摘要
    1行相思混交的要低6.71%,树高、胸径差异性不显著;比1株按树1株相
    思的树高、总蓄积量要低8.7%、6.99%,胸径差异性不显著。在各种混交方
    式综合来看,1株按树1株相思、l行按树1行相思的混交效果较好。
     4施氮肥对按树林地土壤的硝态氮、氨态氮的影响较大。半年后,不施
    肥处理的硝态氮、氨态氮比造林前分别低308.3%、35.5%;而施肥处理只比
    造林前低87.3%、22.3%。这说明施氮肥后及时补充了按树早期生长所需的
    土壤N素。
     5施氮肥对按树的生物量有显著的影响,施肥处理的树干、树皮、枝条、
    根生物量都要比不施肥高。施1009、巧0g氮肥处理的总生物量比不施肥要
    分别高144.3%、953%。施1009氮肥处理的生物量比施1509的要高,可能
    当氮肥达到一定量后对按树的生长有抑制作用。
     6不同的立地条件下不同的配方施肥对按树的高、地径生长有显著的影
    响。以广西防城港的N15P15K15配方施肥地径最大,为4.96cm;高生长以
    广东唐家的N5P18K8配方最大,达3.slm。校树高、地径在不同立地条件下
    的差异,除受施肥配方影响外,还跟土壤性质、当地的气候条件有密切的关
    系。
Land degradation of eucalypt plantations after successive rotations limits the development of plantation industry in south China. Therefore, it is important to increase the productivity of the eucalypt plantations by increasing soil nutrient availability. Trails on mixed plantation of Eucalyptus urophylla (clone U6) with Acacia crassicarpa, N fertilizer application to Eucalyptus urophylla (clone U6) were established in Leizhou, Guangdong to determine the relationship between soil N supply and tree growth, and the change of soil nutrient status. At the same time, 4 different sites in Guangdong and Guangxi were selected in order to determine the growth of Eucalyptus urophylla (clone U6) with the application of different fertilizers. The conclusions of the thesis are as follows:
    1 There was a significant difference among mixing treatments in amount of litterfall. Pure eucalypt treatment had the highest amount of branch litterfall (4.818t/hm2 yr) and the pure acacia treatment had the highest amount of leaf litterfall (17.73 t/hm2 yr). The total amount of litterfall of pure acacia was the highest and pure eucalypt was the smallest among all treatmensts. Concentration of N in acacia leaf litterfall was highest (11.18 g/kg) and branch of eucalypt was lowest (4.44 g/kg) among different components of litterfall. Concentrations of P, K, B in eucalypt leaf litterfall was 0.96 g/kg, 0.31 g/kg, 64.85 mg/kg, respectively, and they were higher than in acacia leaf litterfall. Pure acacia treatment had the
    
    
    
    highest total K content in litterfall among all treatments. The treatment with one eucalypt and one acacia tree in the same row had the highest P content in litterfall and the treatment of one row eucalypt with one row acacia had the highest N, B contents in litterfall among all treatments. Intercroping acacia with eucalypt increased litterfall and the best mixing treatments were a eucalypt and an acacia tree in the same row or a row eucalypt with a row acacia.
    2 The pure acacia forest had the highest concentration of NO3--N, NH4+-N and available K in topsoil, and pure eucalyptus forest had the highest available P in top soil. There was no difference between the 2 treatments of a eucalypt and an acacia tree in the same row and a row eucalypt with a row acacia in available nutrients in top soil. It was proved that mixed plantation increased N availability in top soil in comparison with pure eucalypt plantation.
    3 Height, diameter and stand volume of trees were different among treatments, but the total stand volume was not significantly different. Comparing to the treatment of a row eucalypt with a row acacia, the stand volume of pure eucalypt was 6.71% lower, but the tree height and diameter were not significant different. Comparing to the treatment of a eucalypt and an acacia tree in the same row, height and stand volume of eucalypt trees in pure eucalypt treatment was 8.7% and 6.99% lower, respectively, but diameter of eucalypt trees was not significantly different. The 2 treatments of a eucalypt and an acacia tree in the same row and a row eucalypt with a row acacia were much better than other mixed treatments.
    4 Application of N fertilizer to eucalypt plantation remarkably increased NO3--N and NH4+-N in top soil. After half year, concentrations of NO3--N and NH4+-N in top soil were 308.3% and 35.5% lower than those in topsoil before
    
    tree planting without application of N fertilizer. But with application of N fertilizer, they were only 87.3% and 22.3% lower than before planting. The application of N fertilizer increased N supply to tree growth in the early plantation establishment.
    5 There was a significant effect of N application on biomass of eucalypt trees. The biomass of tree trunk, bark, branch and root in the treatments with N application were much higher than those without N application. Comparing to the treatment without N application, the total biomass of the 2 treatments with 100g and 150g N fertilizer per tree was 144.3%, 95.3% higher, respectively. The lower biomass in the treatment with 1
引文
普瑞尔L.D.(曾龄英译).桉树生物学.云南林业研究所出版,1995.
    白嘉雨.亚太地区桉树发展现状.世界林业研究,1996,9(1):56-68.
    王壑然,布洛克M.I.H.中国桉树检索表.北京:中国科学出版社,1991.
    陈少雄.中国桉树栽培区的分类研究.桉树科技,1996,2:1-7.
    Brown, A. G., Nambiar, E. K. S., Cossalter, C. Plantation for the tropics-their role, extent and nature. In: Nambiar, E. K. S., Brown, A. G(Eds), Management of Soil, Nutrients ans Water in Tropical Plantation Forests. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia, pp, 1997, 1-19.
    Ken Mcnabb . Silvicultural Techniques for Short rotation Eucalyptus Plantation in Brazil. In: Mechanization in Short Rotation, Intensive Culture Forest Conference, Mobile, AL, March, 1994: 1-3.
    林书蓉,李淑仪等.桉树氮、磷、钾施肥研究初报.见张万儒、刘寿波主编.森林土壤.北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992,287-292.
    弓明钦,陈应龙,仲崇禄.菌根研究及应用.中国林业出版社,1997,99-101.
    胡曰利,吴晓芙,王尚明,陈孝,杨伟东.桉树人工林地有机物和养分库的衰退及防治.中南林学院学报,2000,20(4):36-40.
    苏英吾,李向阳.华南土壤肥力特征与桉树施肥.中南林业调查规划,1997,16(3):35-38.
    李贻铨.林木施肥在林业可持续发展中的意义与作用.中国林业出版社.2001.204-213.
    林书蓉,李淑仪,廖观荣等.短轮伐期桉树人工林科学施肥的研究.林业科学研究,1999,12(3):275-282.
    梁坤南,周文龙,李贻铨.尾叶桉实生林施肥6a试验研究。林业科学研究,2002,15(6):644-653.
    梁坤南,周文龙,李贻铨.尾叶桉无性系施肥6年的生长效应.广东林业科技,2003,19(1):1-5.
    张建国,万细瑞.酸性土壤上磷素营养对杉木、湿地松和尾叶桉苗木生长的影响.中国林业出版社.2001.2-7.
    
    
    江松远,杨曾奖,徐大平,温记贤.施肥对尾叶桉萌芽林生长的影响.林业科学研究,2002,15(6):666-671.
    XU D P, YANG Z J, Dell B, et al. Effect of site mangement on tree growth and soil nutrient availability of second rotation plantation of Eucalyptus urophylla in Guangdong[A]. In: Nambiar E K S. Cossalter C Tiarks A, et al. Site Mangement and Productivity of Tropical Tree Plantation. CIFOR, Indonesia, 2000, 16-21.
    王洪峰,曾令海,祁述雄等.桉树专用肥促生效果研究.广东林业科技,2000,16(2):16-21.
    何贵平,陈益泰,刘化桐,蔡宏明.施肥对杉木无性系幼林生长的影响.林业科学研究,2000,13(5):535-538.
    凌文昌,梨佐洲,陈礼地,吴立潮.等杉木中龄林施肥效应研究广东林业科技,1998,14(4):14-18.
    巫流民,李贻铨,胡柄堂,纪建书等.花岗岩黄红壤杉木幼林施肥连年生长效应.林业科学研究,1996,10(3):290-295.
    胡柄堂,王学良,蔡宏明,洪顺山等.马尾松幼林施肥持续8年的生长效应.林业科学研究,2000,13(3)286-289.
    谌红辉,温恒辉.马尾松人工中龄林施肥肥效与增益持续性研究.林业科学研究2001,14(5):533-539.
    徐有明,林汉,李贻铨.施肥对湿地松幼林生长和木材物理性质的影响.林业科学,2002,38(4):126-133.
    Goncalves, N. F., Barros, N.F., Nambiar, E. K. S., Novais, R. F. Soil and management for short ration plantation. In Nambiar, E. K. S., Brown, A. G(Eds), Management of soil , nutrient and Water in tropical Plantation Forests. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia, PP, 1997: 379-417.
    Simpson, J. A., Mo, Q. Long term fertilization in eucalyptus at Dongmen. In: Proceedings of China-Australia Afforestation Project at Dongmen, 4th Technicial Exchange senimar, Nanning, China, 1989, pp: 16-28.
    刘水娥,张方秋,陈祖旭,孟宪法,N、P、K营养元素不同配比对马占相思苗期生长的影响.林业科学研究,2002,15(2):163-168.
    潘瑞炽,董愚得等.植物生理学.高等教育出版社(第三版),1995.31-35.
    
    
    Lance T. Santo. Fertilization of eucalyptus for rapid canopy closure on the Hamakua coast in Paauilo. Forestry report, 4 May, 2000.
    张建国,盛炜彤,罗红艳,熊有强.N、P、NP营养对杉木苗木生长和光合产物分配的影响.林业科学,2003,39(2):22-27.
    吴有胜,张往祥,曹福亮.氮磷钾对银杏苗木和生理特性的影响.南京林业大学学报,2003,27(1):64-66.
    康利华,徐大平,徐建明.桉树接种固氮菌效果的研究.广东林业科技,1999,15(2):33-36.
    孙景伟.杨树、刺槐混交能促进速生丰产.林业发展趋势与丰产林经验,国家林业总局森林经营局编,1978:300-306.
    姚延涛等.杨柠混交林生物量及营养元素循环的研究.中国青年绿色论坛中国林学会第三届青年学术研讨及成果展示会论文精选.中国林业出版社,1994,34-37.
    杨曾奖,郑海水,翁启杰.桉树与固氮树种混交对地力及生物量的影响.广东林业科技,1995,11(5):10-15.
    肖文光,王尚明,陈孝等.两种桉树与厚荚相思混交的生长效应研究.广东林业科技,1999,15(3):9-14.
    胡曰利,吴晓芙,王尚明,陈孝,杨伟东.桉树人工林地有机物和养分库的衰退及防治.中南林学院学报,2000,20(4):36-40.
    Langkamp, P. J. Nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) by Acacia pellita on area restored after mining at Eylandt. Northern Territory. Aust. J. Bot, 1979 (27): 353-361.
    Admas. M. A. & P. M. Attiwill, 1981. Role of Acacia sp. In regeneration Eucalyptus regnans F. Muel: temporal changes in bomass and nutrient content. Aust. J.Bot, 1981(32): 205-215.
    吕树英.关于营造混交林的几个基本观点.云南林业科技,2001,94(1):26-28.
    吴应建,庄凯波.大力营造混交林提高林业生态建设质量.山西林业,2001(6):12-18.
    陈际伸.混交林营造及其机理的研究概括.江西林业科技,2001,2:26-34.
    Binkley Detal. Biogeochemistry of adjacent conifer and conifer-alder ecosystem. Submitted to Ecology, 1991.
    
    
    Binkley Detal. Biogeochemistry of adjacent conifer and conifer-alder ecosystem. Submitted to Ecology, 1991.
    Hart S C, Binkley D, Perry D A. Influence of red alder on soil nitrogen transformation in two conifer forests of contrasting productivity. Soil Biol Biochem, 1997, 29(7): 1111-1123.
    Giardina C P, Huffman S, Binkley D. Alders increase soil phosphorus availability in a Douglas-fir plantation. Can J For Res. 1995, 25: 1652-1657.
    莫晓勇.桉树纸浆林良种选育技术研究.博士论文.2002:17-18.
    苏波,韩兴国,渠春梅,黄建辉.东灵山油松纯林和油松-辽东栎针阔混交林土壤氮素矿化/硝化作用研究.植物生态学报,2001,25(2):195-203.
    Niklinska M, Maryanski M and Laskowski R. Effect of temperature on humus respiration rate and nitrogen minerlization: Implications for global climate change. Biogechemistry, 1999, 44: 239-257.
    余雪标,陈秋波,王尚明.人工林地力衰退研究与防治对策.见余雪标主编.桉树人工林长期生产力管理研究.北京:中国林业出版社,2000:1-7.
    苏波,韩兴国,渠春梅,黄建辉.东灵山油松纯林和油松-辽东栎针阔混交林土壤氮素矿化/硝化作用研究.植物生态学报,2001,25(2):195-203
    廖观荣.我过桉树人工林立地土壤问题研究概括.生态环境,2003,12(1):119-121.
    廖观荣,林书蓉,李淑仪.雷州半岛桉树人工林地力退化的成因与防治措施[J].土壤与环境,2002,11(3):268-273.
    陈章和,王伯荪,张宏达.南亚热带常绿阔叶林的生产力.广东高等教育出版社,1996,98-99.
    Proctor J . Ecological studies in four contrasting lowland rain in Gunung Mulu Natural Park, Sarawak Ⅱ. Litter standing crop and preliminary observation on herbivory. J. Ecol, 1983, 71,261-283.
    Tanner E V J . Litterfall, in montane rain forest of Jamaica and its relation to climate. J. Ecol, 1980, 68: 833-848.
    Sharma E and R S Ambasht. Litterfall, decompostition and nutrient release in an age sequence of Alnus nepalensis plantation stands in the eastern Hiamlaya, J.Ecol, 1987, 75(4): 997-1010.
    
    
    陈章和,王伯荪,张宏达.南亚热带常绿阔叶林的生产力.广东高等教育出版社,1996,98-99.
    廖军,张卫栋,薛建辉,施建敏,邵锦锋,曾宪玮.竹阔混交林混交类型的综合评价.江西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,24(3):346-349.
    陈绍栓.杉木细柄阿丁枫混交林涵养水源功能和土壤肥力的研究.生态学报,2002,22(6):958-961.
    廖利平、杨跃军、汪思龙、高洪.杉木(cunninghamia lanceolata)、火枥楠(Michelia macclurei)纯林及其混交林细根分布、分解与养分归还.生态学报,1999,19(3):342-346.
    陈绍栓.杉木细柄阿丁枫混交林涵养水源功能和土壤肥力的研究.生态学报,2002,22(6):958-961.
    苏波,韩兴国,渠春梅,黄建辉.东灵山油松纯林和油松-辽东栎针阔混交林土壤氮素矿化、硝化作用研究.植物生态学报,2001,25(2):195-203
    吴平,印莉萍,张立平.植物营养分子生理学.科学出版社.2001,1-98.
    Vitousek, P M. Litterfall nutrient cycling and nutrient limitation in tropical forests. Ecology, 1984, 61: 285-298.
    Vitousek, P. M & P. S. White. Process studies in succession In. West, D. C H H. Shugart & D. B. Botk in eds. Forest succession: concepts and application. New York: Springger Verlag, 1981, 267-276.
    Tilman. D. The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. American Naturalist, 1985, 125: 827-845.
    Montagnini, F &. R. Buschbacher. Nutrification rates in two undisturbed tropical rain forest and three slash and burn sites of the Venezuelan Amazon. Biotropica, 1989, 21: 9-14.
    胡延杰,瞿明普.杨树刺槐混交林及纯林土壤微生物数量及活性与土壤养分转化关系研究.土壤,2002(1):42-50.
    余叔文,汤章城.植物生理与分子生物学(第二版).北京:科学出版社,1998.
    陈永亮,韩士杰,周玉梅,邹春静.胡桃楸、落叶松纯林及其混交林根际土壤有效磷特性的研究.应用生态学报,2002,13(7):790-794.
    陈永亮,韩士杰,周玉梅,邹春静.胡桃楸、落叶松纯林及其混交林根际土壤有效磷特性的研究.应用生态学报,2002,13(7):790-794.
    
    
    蒋三乃,翟明普,贾黎明.混交林种间养分关系研究进展.北京林业大学学报,2001,23(2):72-76.
    Warington, K . The effect of boring acid and borax on the broad bean and certain other plants. Ann. Bot., 1923.37: 629-670.
    Cakmak, L and Romheld, V. Boron deficiency-induced impairments of cellular functions jin plants. Plant and soil, 1997, 193: 71-83.
    Gupta, U. C. Boron toxicity and deficiency: a review. Can .J. Soil Sci. ,1985, 65: 381-409.
    Brown, P. H. and Hu, H. Does boron play only a structural role in the growing tissues of higher plants[J]. plant and soil, 1997, 193(2): 211-215.
    周洪波,沈伯葵.杉木缺硼症的组织学和生理生化特征研究[J].中南林学院学报,1997,17(1):32-35.
    陈金林,俞元春等.杉木、马尾松、甜楮等林分土壤养分状况研究.林业科学研究,1998,11(6):586-591.
    Binkley D & Hart S C. The components of nitrogen availability assessment in forest soils. Advances in Soil Sciences, 1989,10:56-112.
    Mitchell H L, & Chandler R F. The nitrogen nutrition and growth of certain deciduous trees of north eastern Unit-ed States. Harvard Univ. Black Rock For. Bull., 1939,11:1-94.
    Peter B R, David F G, ,John D A. Nitrogen mineralization and productivity in 50 hard wood and conifer stands on diverse soils. Ecology, 1997,78(2):335-347.
    左永忠、申增元、宋珍、刘长英.氮磷镁对合欢幼苗生长效益的研究.河北林果研究,1997,12(1):63-67.
    顾小平、萧江华、梁文焰、林阳峰、张川.毛竹纸浆竹林施用氮磷钾肥料效应的研究.林业科学,1998,34(1):26-32.
    将代华、白厚义、罗献宝.银杏氮素诊断技术研究.植物营养与肥料学报,2002,8(2):210-213.
    莫晓勇.桉树纸浆林良种选育技术研究.博士论文.2002:17-18.
    岳春雷、汪奎宏、何奇江.不同氮素条件下雷竹克隆生长的比较研究.竹子研究汇刊,2002,21(1):38-45.
    
    
    Hinckly T M, braaarne J, ceulemans R. Growth dynamics and canopy structure, In Ecophysiology of short ratation forest crop. Londin and New York: Applied Science, 1992, 1-34.
    陈松河,郑清芳.黄甜竹笋用林的生物量、叶面积指数和叶绿素含量.亚热带植物通讯,1996,25(1):22-27.
    肖水清,廖龙泉,张华.15种优良阔叶树生态学特性研究-叶面积指数、叶片生物量及滞水量的研究.江西林业科技,2000,(5):1-9.
    唐真清,戴垂武.刚果12号桉三林无性系树冠结构特征及地上部分生物量的分配.热带农业科学,1999,2(1):26-30.
    任安之,高玉葆,王金龙.不同沙地生境下黄柳(Salxi gordejevii)的根系分布和冠层结构特征.生态学报,2001,21(3):399-404.
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.