合作技术创新项目评估研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着世界经济一体化的不断发展和各国经济开放程度的不断提高,企业要想在激烈的市场竞争中立于不败之地,其核心问题是提高技术创新项目开发力度,提升技术创新能力,建立完善的自主创新和协同创新机制。
     论文首先分析了目前合作技术创新现状,对常用的合作创新模式进行了归类和分析。然后,建立了动态博弈下的合作创新博弈模型,并分析了影响合作创新项目的主要因素。
     在合作创新项目评估指标体系的研究方面,论文讨论了在不同创新模式下项目创新能力、项目合作能力和项目产出能力对项目整体的影响,对问卷调查的数据进行了因子分析和信度、效度校验,最后构建了合作创新项目评估指标体系,提出了将定性指标定量化和定量指标标准化的方法。
     在构建合作技术创新项目评估方法的过程中,论文分析了各种数学建模方法优缺点,根据项目特点选择了群组AHP法进行数学建模。在评估方法研究中,采用专家聚类分析法,引入判断矩阵一致性比例综合对专家赋权,最后提出了合作技术创新项目评估方法。
     在案例分析中,论文通过对某企业高新技术领域内合作项目的评估,论证了合作技术创新项目评估体系和方法的有效性。
     合作技术创新项目评估是一项复杂的系统过程,也是一种多因素的综合决策过程,在中国现有国情下具有广泛的应用前景和重要的现实意义,有待后来者的继续深入研究。
As the development of the international economic integration and the improvement of the countries' economic open degree, the central problem for an enterprise to win success in the cut-throat competition in the markets is to improve the technique innovation exploitation, enhance the innovation ability and establish the independent and cooperative innovation mechanisms
     This paper firstly analyzes the present condition of the cooperative technical innovation, classifies the typical cooperative innovation models, establishes the dynamic game model and analyzes the main factors influencing the cooperative innovation programs.
     Referring to the cooperative innovation evaluating index system and viewing from different models, the paper discusses the innovative ability, the cooperative ability and the output ability, establishes the cooperative innovation evaluating index system and brings forward the methods to quantify the qualitative indexes and standardize the quantitative indexes.
     In the process of establishing the cooperative innovation evaluating methods, the paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of different mathematic models. According to the characteristics of different programs, the paper chooses the AHP method to establish the mathematic model. In the evaluating method research, the paper chooses the expert clustering way, inducting judging matrix consistent scale, to introduce the cooperative innovation evaluating methods.
     In the demonstration, by evaluating a certain enterprise's cooperative program, the paper testifies the validity of the evaluating system and methods.
     Cooperative technique innovation evaluation is a complex systematic process. Besides, it is a multiple-factors decision-making process. It has wide foreground and great significance in China and needs more and deeper researches.
引文
[1]傅家骥等.技术创新学[M].清华大学出版社,1998.11
    [2]吴贵生.技术创新管理[M].北京,清华大学出版社,2000
    [3]谢科范.技术创新风险管理[M].科技出版社,1999,12:1-2
    [4]郭晓川.企业网络合作化技术创新及其模式比较[J].科学管理研究,1999,1
    [5]葛新权等.技术创新与管理[M].社会科学文献出版社,277-281
    [6]科斯.财产权与制度变迁[M].清华大学出版社,1998,11
    [7]上半年全国重点企业技术创新情况分析[J].中国经贸导刊,2005,18:24-25
    [8]Fritsch,Michael,Lukas,Rolf W.Cooperates on R&D[J].Research Policy,2001,30:297-312
    [9]Kamien,Morton,Muller;Eitan,Zang.Israel Research joint ventures and R&D cartels[J].American Economic Review,1992,82(5):1293-1992
    [10]Katsoulacos,Yannis,Ulph,David.Endogenous spillovers and the performance of research joint ventures[J].Journal of Industrial Economics,1998,46:333-357
    [11]Aspremont,Claude and Jacquemin,Alexis.Cooperative and Noncooperative R &D in Duopoly with Spillovers:Erratum[J].American Economic Review,1990,80:641-642
    [12]Kamien,M.I,Zang,I.Meet me halfway:research joint ventures and absorptive capacity[J].International.Journal of Industrial Organization,2000,18:995-1012
    [13]Ziss.Strategic R&D with Spillovers,Collusion and Welfare[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics,Vol.ⅩLM.No.2,June 1995
    [14]Sakakibara,Mariko.Heterogeneity of Firm Capabilities and Cooperative research and Development:An Empirical Examination of Motives[J].Strategic Management Journal,1997,18:143-164
    [15]罗炜,唐元虎.企业能力差异与合作创新动机.预测,2001,20(3):20-23
    [16]徐华.中小企业创新网络:构建动因与策略[J].科学与科学技术管理,2002,2:44-45
    [17]郭晓川.企业网络合作化技术创新及其模式比较[J].科学管理研究,1998,16(5):13-17
    [18]Irwin,D.A.,Klenow,P.J.High-tech RD subsidies.Estimating the effects of Sematech[J].Journal of International Economics,1996,40:323-344
    [19]Kreiner,Kristian,and Majken Schultz.Informal collaboration in R&D—The Formation of Networks across Organizations[J].Organization Studies,,1993,14
    [20]Badaracco,J.L..The Knowledge Link:How firms compete though strategic alliances[J].Harvard Business School Press,1991
    [21]Ensign,P.C..Innovation in the multinational firm with globally dispersed R&D.Technological knowledge utilization and accumulation[J].Journal of High Technology Management Research,1999,10(2):203
    [22]Sakakibara,M..Knowledge sharing in cooperative research and development[J].Managerial and Decision Economics,2003,24(2-3):3-5
    [23]Fitzgerald,M..At risk offshore:U.S.Companies outsourcing their software development offshore can get stung by industrial espionage and poor intellectual property safeguards.CIO,2003,17(4)
    [24]Corbin,R.M..Managing risk and protecting intellectual property[J].Ivey Business Journal,2002,66(3)
    [25]张清辉.合作创新风险研究综述[J].工业技术经济,2005,1:57-59
    [26]李朝阳.产学研合作创新中的关键问题及其解决途径[J].学术界,2005,3:220-227
    [27]祁红梅,黄瑞华等.基于合作创新的知识产权冲突道德风险分析[J].科学管理研究,2005,2:16-19
    [28]赵更申,雷巧玲.不同战略导向对自主创新与合作创新的影响研究[J].当代经济科学,2006,28(3):18-23
    [29]张克英,黄瑞华.基于合作创新的知识产权风险影响因素分析——理论分析框架[J].科技管理与科技政策,2006,5:9-14
    [30]Tyebjee T.T.,Bruno A.V.,A model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activity[J].Management Science,1984,vol.30:1051-1066
    [31]Fried V.H.,Toward a Model of Venture Capital Investment Decision Making[J].Financial Management,1994,vol23:28-37
    [32]Boocock J.G.An Examination of Non-bank Funding for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in the UK[J].The Service Industries Journal,1990,vol10(1):124-146
    [33]孙威武.技术创新项目选择综合评价[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2003,4:88-91
    [34]陈青松,沈江.虚拟石化企业技术创新战略设计与实战[J].工业工程,2005,3:83-86
    [35]陈青松,沈江.基于虚拟企业的企业技术创新模式及其应用[J].西安工程科学学院学报,2005,6:192-196
    [36]杜启明.关于技术创新能力指标体系评价研究[J].甘肃农业,2006,6:155
    [37]张春英.高新技术风险投资项目评估指标体系探讨[J].技术经济与管理研究,2001,6:44-45
    [38]贺树云.科技风险投资项目评估的指标体系研究[J].财经理论与实践,2000,9:83-86
    [39]魏巍贤,冯佳.多目标权系数的组合赋权方法研究[J].系统工程与电子技术1998,2:14-16
    [40]王宗军.综合评价的方法问题与研究趋势[J].管理科学学报,1998,1:73-79
    [41]宋光兴.多属性决策理论、方法及其在矿业中的应用研究[D].昆明理工大学,2001
    [42]张卫红.基于主观偏好约束的交互式客观最优化赋权法及其应用[D].国防科技大学,2004
    [43]梁栋,王国华.多层次交互式确定权重的方法[J].系统工程学报,2002,4:359-363
    [44]董雨,王国华,熊立.多层次交互式确定权重方法的改进[J].中国科学技术大学学报,2005,4:556-582
    [45]梁栋,熊立,王国华.一种群决策中专家客观权重的确定方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2005,4:652-655
    [46]王学军,林文兴.项目评估中净现值NPV的推断与分析[J].科学进步与对策,2000,6:160-161
    [47]陈学中,马力.投资项目选择的评价体系和模糊综合评价模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2001,10:55-58
    [48]陈学中、李文喜.投资项目选择的风险评价AHP模型及其应用[J].数学的实践与认识,2004,4:23-29
    [49]徐菱涓,刘宁辉.多因素模糊综合评判模型在风险投资项目评估中的引用研究[J].资本运营,2006,2:65-67
    [50]潘雄峰,刘凤朝.基于主成分分析方法的风险投资项目评估模型[J].评价与预测,2004,3:65-67
    [51]周万隆,侯成琪.基于Black-Scholes公式和ARCH模型的网络投资项目评价[J].决策借鉴,2001,6:35-38
    [52]赵振武.模糊实物期权理论在风险投资项目价值评价中的应用[J].北京理工大学学报,2006,2:49-51
    [53]张守华,孙兆辉.层次灰色方法在科研项目评估中的应用研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2005,10:1744-1748
    [54]刘凤军.项目评估的层次——理想解法[J].价值工程,2005,1:30-33
    [55]徐晋,彭娟.重置变结构神经网络及其在风险投资项目评估中的应用[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2005,2:41-46
    [56]席民,杨列勋.R&D项目评估整体模型研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002,10:105-112
    [57]杨列勋.研究与开发项目评估及应用[M].科学出版社,2002,
    [58]王凭慧.科学研究项目评估方法综述[J].科研管理,1999,3:18-24
    [59]周耀烈.科研项目评分程序与方法[J].科研管理,2000,5:76-83
    [60]张国良,陈宏民.国家高科技研发计划评估体系研究[J].科学学研究,2006,1:57-61
    [61]杨爱华.我国科技评估工作存在的问题与对策[J].高科技与产业化,2005,10:15-17
    [62]Weisenfeld U.et Managing technology as a virtual enterprise[J].R&D Management,2001,31:323-334
    [63]R.L.Daft,Organization Theory and Design 7th ed.(Cincinnati,OH:Southwestern 2001
    [64]李龙一.技术创新与组织结构[J].科技进步与对策,2001,3:69-72
    [65]理查德.L达夫特.组织理论和设计精要[M]机械工业出版社,1999
    [66]T.L.Amburgey and T.Dacin.As the left foot follows the right? The Dynamics of Strategic and Structural Change[J].Academy of Management Journal,,1994,10:1427-1452
    [67]A.H Van de Ven and W.f.Joyce Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior[J].New York:John Wiley,1981,8:135-166
    [68]A.C.Bluedom Pilgrim's Progress:Trends and Convergence in Research on Organizational Size and Environments[J].Journal of Management,1993,9:163-192
    [69]C.perrow A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations[J].American Sociological Review,1967,4:194-208
    [70]S.R.Clegg,C.Hardy and W.R.Nord.Managing Organizations:Current Issues Thousand Oakes,CA:Sage,1999:159-171
    [71]M.Yasai-Ardekani.Structural Adaptations to Environments[J].Academy of Management Review,1986,1:9-21
    [72]Milliken.F.J.Three types of perceived uncertainty about environment:state,effect,and response uncertainty[J].Academy of Management Journal,1987,12:133-143
    [73]Lawrence,P.R.&Lorsch,J.W..Differentiation and integration in complex organizations[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1967,12:1-47
    [74]Banerjee,S.& Lin,P..Vertical research joint ventures[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,2000,19:285-301
    [75]Pastor,Maite,Sandonis,Joel.Research joint ventures vs cross licensing agreements:an agency approach[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,,2002,Vol.20(2):215-249
    [76]Jonash,R.S..Strategic Technology Leveraging:Making Outsourcing Work for You[J].IEEE Engineering Management Review,1997,Summer:90-95.
    [77]Hakanson,L.Managing cooperative research and development:partner selection and contract design[J].R&D Management,1993,23:273-285
    [78]Hagedoorn,J.and J.Schakenraad.The Effect of Strategic Technology Alliances on Company Performance[J]..Strategic Management Journal,1994,16:214-250
    [79]Goyal,S.& Moraga,J.L..R&D networks.RAND Journal of Economics 2001,32 686-707
    [80]Kamien,M.I.& Muller,E.& Zang,I..Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels[J].American Economic Review,1992,82:1293-1306
    [81]程瑞雯.基于学习能力的企业间合作研发模式选择研究[D],2006:9-10
    [82]王安宇.合作研发组织模式选择与治理机制研究[D],2002:26-27
    [83]谢识予.经济博弈论[M].复旦大学出版社,2005:4-6
    [84]柯惠新,黄京华.调查研究中的统计分析法[M].北京广播学院出版社,1992:349-380
    [85]Peterson,A.Robert.A Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Coeffcient Alpha[J].Journal of Consumer Research,1994,Vol.21(2):381-391
    [86]郭志刚.社会统计分析方法[M].中国人民大学出版社,1999:87-112
    [87]马庆国.管理统计[M].科学出版社,2002:167-169
    [88]范伟达.现代社会研究方法.[M].复旦大学出版社,2001:140-143
    [89]国家科技评估中心.科技评估规范[M].中国物价出版社,2001
    [90]中华人民共和国科技部.科技评估管理暂行办法[M].北京,中华人民共和国科技部,2002
    [91]童健.研究与开发项目评估活动的模式[J].科学学研究,1994,1:24-26
    [92]郭碧坚.同行评议制——方法、理论、功能、指标[J].科学学研究,1994,3:15-19
    [93]邱东.多指标综合评价方法的系统分析[M].中国统计出版社,1991
    [94]Saaty,T.L.The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M].New York,McGraw-Hill,1980
    [95]王应明,徐南荣.群体判断矩阵及权向量的最优传递矩阵求法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1991,4:70-74
    [96]王应明.群组判断排序中的广义最小偏差方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1994,14(9):63-68
    [97]徐泽水.群组决策中专家赋权方法研究[J].应用数学与计算数学学报.2001,15(1):19-22
    [98]梁樑,熊立,王国华.一种群决策中确定专家判断可信度的改进方法[J].系统工程,2004,22(6):91-94
    [99]梁樑,王国华.多专家判断信息的一种聚类分析方法[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2003,12(3):270-273
    [100]梁樑,熊立,王国华.一种群决策中专家客观权重的确定方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2005,27(4):652-655
    [101]刘向阳.专家权威性权重与改进的群体决策AHP法[J].中国管理科学,1994,3:41-48;
    [102]郭文明,相景丽,肖凯生.群组AHP权重系数的确定[J].华北工学院学报,2000,21(2):110-113;
    [103]刘万里.关于AHP中群体决策逆判问题的研究[J].模糊系统与数学,2000,14(3):106-110;
    [104]吴云燕,华中生,查勇.AHP群决策权重的确定与判断矩阵的合并[J].运筹与管理,2003,12(4):16-21;
    [105]魏代俊,王能发.关于层次分析法中群体决策权重系数确定的探讨[J].湖北民族学院学报(自然科学版),2007,25(6):146-147
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.