大鼠牙根发育模式相关基因的筛选及部分基因功能的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
牙齿的发育研究可以为牙齿再生及牙齿先天发育异常提供理论依据,同时牙齿发育也是发育生物学中器官发育形成的一个典型模型。目前牙齿早期发育研究较多,但后期的发育,特别是牙根发育相关基因研究较少。牙齿发育是口腔上皮组织与间充质组织相互作用的结果,牙根的发育与上皮根鞘有着密切关系,当牙冠发育即将完成之际上皮根鞘的形成揭开了牙根发育的序幕。本研究目的是利用大鼠下颌磨牙和切牙具有完全不同的牙根发育模式作为动物模型,对牙根发育相关的差异表达基因进行筛选并对部分差异基因的功能进行探讨,为牙根发育及牙根再生研究提供理论依据。
     采用的方法及主要结果:本课题采用组织学、免疫组织化学、改良消减杂交技术、Northern blot、Western blot、RT-PCR、Real-time PCR、细胞培养、基因转染和RNA干扰等方法,进行了以下五部分实验研究:
     第一部分 通过组织学观察大鼠下颌第一磨牙和下颌切牙的发育时序,结果发现胚胎18日(E18)大鼠磨牙和切牙发育开始出现差异,这种差异的表现是磨牙形成了双层细胞的上皮根鞘,开始启动牙根的发育,而切牙舌侧虽然也形成类似根鞘的结构,唇侧却仍然维持多层结构的颈环干细胞龛,始终未能启动牙根发育,仍旧保持牙冠的发育形式。
     第二部分 实验1通过改良消减杂交技术,首次建立了大鼠牙根发育启动相关差异表达基因文库,文库总浓度约为1.5×10~4,经酶切鉴定含有500bp以上插入片段的克隆约为84%,表明所建立的基因文库质量较高,
Objectives: Tooth development is a fine research model to study the interactions between epithelium and underlying mesenchymal. From studying the tooth development mechanism, we will not only find the origin of clinical congenital tooth abnormity but also make it possible to achieve the tooth regeneration, which now is still a dream of human. Compared with many studies of early tooth development, little was known about the root development. The root development begins at the forming of Hertwig's epithelial root sheath which was double layers of cells, and the rat molars and incisors have different root patterning mechanisms: the former formed a multirooted pattern while the latter formed a single-rooted analogue. In this study, we use the natural tooth root development animal model—the rat incisor and molar root patterning to screening the root patterning related genes and study some of the genes' functions in development. Methods and the main results: By using molecular biology and cell biology technologies, such as substractive hybridization, northern blot, Western blot ,RT-PCR, Real-time PCR, cell culture, gene transfection and RNAi, this study obtained the following results:
    In the section 1, we first observed the Hertwig's epithelial root sheath's development timing of molar and incisor, and we founded that in E18 the molar and the incisor began differentially development: the molar formed double-layer cells of root sheaths, but the incisor labial epithelium grew longer in length than the lingual epithelium and formed the cervical loop, which was a region thought to contain a population of self-renewing epithelial stem cells. Though the lingual epithelium formed double layers of root sheath, the incisor germs continue to grow as crown pattern without forming a root.In the section 2 study 1, based on the section 1, the rat (E18) lower molar and incisor tissue were removed and mRNA was abtained by magnetic beads coupled with oligodT, and the mRNA were synthesized and amplified by SMART PCR cDNA Synthesis Kit. Then, using MSH method and T/A cloning techniques, cDNA fragments of differentially expressed genes in rat molar were inserted into competence DH5a bacteria. Positive clone were selected randomly and evaluate by enzyme digestion. cDNA subtractive library of rat molar E18 was set up successfully with high subtractive efficiency. 84% positive clone were identified by enzyme digestion and most of the insert were longer than 500 bp. the library's total content was about 1.5×10~4. In the study 2, by using reverse dot blot and DNA sequencing, we screened the positive clones and found some development related genes which were differentially expressed in the molar and incisors and were strongly related the tooth initiation and root patterning, such as Se11L, NfiC, Edar, GATA6, and some new genes or unknown genes. We successfully constructed a subtraction cDNA library of rat molar root developmental patterning, which laid a foundation for studying specific genes for tooth root developmental patterning.
    In the section 3 study 1, we named a new EST "Molar Root Patterning gene 1" (Mrp1) and submitted to the GeneBank with a accession number AY598353.We Designed a Mrp1-specific DNA probe and by using Northern blot and RT-PCR, we found that the expression of Mrpl were not only in the molar but also in the developing pancreas, liver,lung and kidney tissues, and the Mrpl mRNA full length was about 3Kb. By using bioinformatics analysis, we found the Mrp1 was located in the 18q12.3 chromosome of the rats and the Mrp1 amino acids sequence had about 37% homology with a known protein Uroplakin IIIb (p35) which was an urothelial differentiation membrane molecular marker. And by other biological software we found Mrpl had a trans-membrane structure and 5 PKC phosphorylation sites, 4 CKII phosphorylation sites.In the study 2, we successfully constructed a recombinant prokaryotic expression vector PGEX-4T-Mrpl which expressed the C-terminal polypeptide of Mrp1 in the E.coli D H 5a bacteria.In the section 4, we construct and analysis multiple alternative spliceosome of NfiC gene of E18 rat molar tissues, because previous studies had shown that NfiC gene was specific to the tooth root development and play a key role in the root formation, and NfiC gene was differentially expressed in molar and incisor germs. Two pairs of primers were designed, which were specific to the NfiC gene and by RT-PCR method, we amplified the NfiC gene in the rat molar tissue. The fragments were were inserted into competence DH5a bacteria. Positive clone were selected randomly and evaluated by enzyme digestion and sequencing. As the results that we found that there were at least three deffierent alternative spliceosome of NfiC gene in the rat molar which were named with rNFIC-1、 rNFIC-2 and rNFIC-3.As a conclusion from section 4, the NfiC gene expressed in the rat molar, and there was a multiple
    alternative splicing way for the NfiC gene to play their functions which was unknown in the tooth development.In the section 5 study 1, in order to study the root patterning related gene Sel1L in the tooth development, first we studied the Sel1L's expression pattern in the tooth development and in vitro cultured Tooth Germ Cells(TGCs) using a monocloned antibody of Sel1L(a generous gift from Dr.Sylvie Menard and Dr.Ida Biunno).the immunohistochemistry results proved the SellL had a dynamic expression pattern in the tooth development: in the early stage, it was only a weak expression in the dental epithelial and neighbouring mesenchymal., but in the E18(root pattern period), it was mainly located in the differentiated cells, such as ameoblasts and odontoblasts, and in the incisor, only the cervical loop marginal cells were positive and the inner epithelia stem cells were not positive which inferred the SellL might related with cells' differentiation. In the study 2, we constructed a RNAi vector which specifically knock down the SellL gene's expression and transfected into TGCs. After transfection, we detected the SellL expression level by RT-PCR and western blot, the results showed RNAi vector had a nice blocking effect of SellL gene. In the study3, we studied the phenotype and genotype of TGCs after RNAi vector transfection. The results showed that compared with the control group: (1)the transfected cell had a enhanced proliferation which demonstrated SellL gene might inhibit the cells' growing.(2)the transfected group cells had less apoptosis.(3)by using RT-PCR and real-time PCR, we found the Hesl gene, which were the main targets of Notch signaling, were up-regulated after RNAi.(4)Western blot results showed Smad4, the TGFβ signaling molecular, were down-regulated.(5)Western blot results also showed DSPP, the chief differentiation marker of odontoblasts, signaling molecular,
引文
1. Salazar-Ciudad I, Jemvall J, Newman SA.Mechanisms of pattem formation in development and evolution. Development. 2003, 130 (10): 2027-37.
    2. Wilkins, A. S.. The Evolution of Developmental Pathways. Massachussets. Sinauer Associates Inc (2001).
    3. Salazar-Ciudad, I., Garcia-Fernandez, J.and Sole, RV. Gene networks capable of pattern formation: from induction to reaction-diffusion. J. Theor. Biol. 2000, 205 (4): 587-603.
    4. Riechmann, V. and Ephrussi, A. Axis formation during Drosophila oogenesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2001, 11(4): 374-383.
    5. Doe, C. Q. and Bowerman, B. Asymmetric cell division: fly neuroblast meets worm zygote. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001, 13(1): 68-75
    6. Newman, S. A. Is segmentation generic? BioEssays 1993, 15(4): 277-83
    7. Rivera-Pomar, R. and Jackle, H. From gradients to stripes in Drosophila embryogenesis: filling in the gaps. Trends Genet. 1996, 12(11): 478-83
    8. Miura, T. and Shiota, K. Extracellular matrix environment influences chondrogenic pattern formation in limb bud micromass culture: Experimental verification of theoretical models. Anat. Rec. 2000, 258(1): 100-7
    9. Goldstein, B. When cells tell their neighbors which direction to divide. Dev. Dyn. 2000, 218(1): 23-9
    10. Kuan, C. Y., Roth, K. A., Flavell, R. A. and Rakic, P. Mechanisms of programmed cell death in the developing brain. Trends Neurosci. 2000, 23(7): 291-7
    11. Ganan, Y., Macias, D., Basco, R. D., Merino, R. and Hurle, J. M. Morphological diversity of the avian foot is related with the pattern of msx gene expression in the developing autopod. Dev. Biol. 1998, 196(1): 33-41
    12. Kubota, Y. and Ito, K. Chemotactic migration of mesencephalic neural crest cells in the mouse. Dev. Dyn. 2000, 217(2): 170-9
    13. Lee, K. K., Wong, C. C., Webb, S. E. Hepatocyte growth factor stimulates chemotactic response in mouse embryonic limb myogenic cells in vitro. J. Exp. Zool. 1999, 283(2): 170-80
    14. Newman, S. A. and Muller, G. B. Epigenetic mechanisms of character origination. J. Exp. Zool. 2000, 288(4): 304-17
    15. Le Douarin, N. and Kalcheim, C. The Neural Crest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1999).
    16. Hall, B. K. and Miyake, T. All for one and one for all: condensations and the initiation of skeletal development. BioEssays. 2000, 22(2): 138-47
    17. Werb, Z., Sympson, C. J., Alexander, C. M. Extracellular matrix remodeling and the regulation of epithelial-stromal interactions during differentiation and involution. Kidney Int. Suppl. 1996, 54: S68-74
    18.金岩.口腔颌面组织胚胎学.陕西科学技术出版社.西安,2002.4
    19. Ten Care AR. Oral Histology: Development, structure and function. 5th edition. Ed. Mosby-Year book, Inc. 1998
    20. AS Tucker, DJ Headon, P Schneider. Edar/Eda interactions regulate enamel knot formation in tooth morphogenesis.Development, 2000, 127( 21): 4691-4700
    21. Osborn JW, Ten Cate AR. Advanced dental histology. Bristol: J. Wright and Sons, 1983
    22. St Amand TR, Zhang Y, Semina EV,. Antagonistic signals between BMP4 and FGF8 define the expression of Pitxl and Pitx2 in mouse tooth-forming anlage. Dev Biol. 2000, 217(2): 323-32.
    23. Cobourne MT, Sharpe PT. Tooth and jaw: molecular mechanisms of patterning in the first branchial arch. Arch Oral Biol. 2003, 48(1): 1-14.
    24. Ornitz DM, Itoh N. Fibroblast growth factors. Genome Biol. 2001. 2(3): 3005-3016.
    25. Klint, P., Claesson-Welsh, L. Signal transduction by fibroblast growth factor receptors. Front Biosc. 1999, 4: D165-77
    26. Botchkarev, V. A. Bone Morphogenetic Proteins and their antagonists in skin and hair follicle biology. J Invest Dermatol. 2003, 120(1): 36-47
    27. Canalis E, Economides AN, Gazzerro E. Bone morphogenetic proteins, their antagonists, and the skeleton. Endocr Rev. 2003, 24(2): 218-35.
    28. Hammerschmidt M, Brook A, McMahon AP. The world according to hedgehog. Trends Genet. 1997, 13 (1): 14-21
    29. Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Lauter E, Tabin C.Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell. 1993, 75(7): 1401-16
    30. Sarkar L, Cobourne M, Naylor S, Smalley M, Dale T, Sharpe PT. Wnt/Shh interactions regulate ectodermal boundary formation during mammalian tooth development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97(9): 4520-4.
    31. Hardcastle Z, Hui CC, Sharpe PT. The Shh signalling pathway in early tooth development. Cell Mol Biol, 1999, 45(5): 567-78
    32. Dassule HR, Lewis P, Bei M, Maas R, McMahon AP. Sonic hedgehog regulates growth and morphogenesis of the tooth. Development, 2000, 127(22): 4775-85
    33.唐志英.Wnt信号通道的分子学机制及在牙胚发育中的调控作用.国外医学口腔医学分册,2002,29(5):265-67
    34. Sarkar L, Sharpe PT. Expression of Wnt signalling pathway genes during tooth development. Mech Dev, 1999 , 85(1-2): 197-200.
    35. Dassule HR, McMahon AP. Analysis of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the initial morphogenesis of the mammalian tooth. Dev Biol,1998,202(2):215-27
    36. Pazianos, G., Uqoezwa, M., Reya, T. The elements of stem cell self-renewal: a genetic perspective. Biotechniques.2003, 35(6): 1240-7
    37. Yoneya T, Tahara T, Nagao K et al.Molecular cloning of Delta-4, a new mouse and human notch ligand. J Biochem. 2001,129(1 ):27-34
    38. Beatus P , Lundkvist J , Oberg C , et al . The origin of the ankyrin repeat region in notch intracellular domains is critical for regulation of HES pro2 moter activity. Mech Dev, 2001 , 104 (1 - 2) :3-20.
    39. Feder JN , Jan LY, Jan YN. A rat gene with sequence homology to the drosophila gene hairy is rapidly induced by growth factors known to influence neuronal differentiation. Mol Cell Biol , 1993 ,13(l):105-113.
    40. Suzuki K, Fukui H, Kayahara T.Hes 1-deficient mice show precocious differentiation of Paneth cells in the small intestine.Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005,328(l):348-52.
    41. Castella, P., Sawai, S., Nakao, K., Wagner, J. A. and Caudy, M. HES-1 repression of differentiation and proliferation in PC 12 cells: role for the helix 3-helix 4 domain in transcription repression. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000 , 20( 16):6170-83
    42. Mitsiadis TA, Regaudiat L, Gridley T. Role of the Notch signalling pathway in tooth morphogenesis.Arch Oral Biol. 2005,50(2): 137-40.
    43. Tummers M, Thesleff I.Root or crown: a developmental choice orchestrated by the differential regulation of the epithelial stem cell niche in the tooth of two rodent species.Development. 2003 ,130(6): 1049-57
    44. Mitsiadis TA, Lardelli M, Lendahl U, Thesleff I.Expression of Notch 1, 2 and 3 is regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and retinoic acid in the developing mouse tooth and associated with determination of ameloblast cell fate.J Cell Biol. 1995,130(2):407-18.
    45. Kere, J., Srivastava, AK., Montonen, O., et al. Xlinked anhidrotic (hypohidrotic) ectodermal dysplasia is caused by mutation in a novel transmembrane protein. Nat. Genet. 1996 ,13(4):409-16
    46. Majumder K, Shawlot W, Schuster G, Harrison W, Elder FF, Overbeek PA.YAC rescue of downless locus mutations in mice.Mamm Genome. 1998 ,9(11):863-8.
    47. Courtney JM, Blackburn J, Sharpe PT.The Ectodysplasin and NFkappaB signalling pathways in odontogenesis.Arch Oral Biol. 2005 ,50(2): 159-63.
    48. Pispa J, Mustonen T, Mikkola ML et al.Tooth patterning and enamel formation can be manipulated by misexpression of TNF receptor Edar.Dev Dyn. 2004 , 231(2):432-40.
    49. Tucker AS, Headon D J, Schneider P, Ferguson BM, Overbeek P, Tschopp J, Sharpe PT. Edar/Eda interactions regulate enamel knot formation in tooth morphogenesis.Development. 2000, 127(21): 4691-700.
    50. Laurikkala, J., Mikkola, M., Mustonen etal. TNF signaling via the ligand-receptor pair ectodysplasin and edar controls the function of epithelial signaling centers and is regulated by Wnt and activin during tooth organogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2001, 229(2): 443-455.
    51. Laurikkala, J., Pispa, J., Jung, H. S. etal. Regulation of hair follicle development by the TNF signal ectodysplasin and its receptor Edar. Development 2002, 129(10): 2541-53
    52. Blokzijl, A., Dahlqvist, C., Reissmann, E. et al. (2003) Cross-talk between the Notch and TGF-beta signaling pathways mediated by interaction of the Notch intracellular domain with Smad3. J Cell Biol. 2003, 163(4): 723-8
    53. Takumi Takizawa, Wataru Ochiail, Kinichi Nakashima,Tetsuya Taga. Enhanced gene activation by Notch and BMP signaling cross-talk. Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, 31(19): 5723-5731
    54.崔大祥,闫小君.克隆差异表达基因的新策略.生物化学与生物物理进展2000,27(4):362-364
    55. Bertioli D J, Schlichter UH, Adams M J, et al. An analysis of differential display shows a strong bias towards high copy number mRNAs. Acids Res. 1995, 23(21): 4520-3
    56. Liang P, Zhu W, Zhang X, Guo Z, et al. Differential display using one-base anchored oligo-dT primers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22(25): 5763-4
    57. Diatchenko L, Lau YF, Campbell AP, et al. Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93(12): 6025-30
    58.王涛,陆应麟.抑制性消减杂交技术的原理和应用.国外医学分子生物学分册.1998:20(6):271-275
    59. Zhongliang Z, Xin H, Nan L, et al. Direct cloning of cell differential expression genes with full-length by a new strategy based on the multiple rounds of long distance polymerase chain reaction and magnetic beads mediated subtraction. Journal of Biotechnology. 1999, 73(1): 35-41.
    60.李鑫,金岩,岳文等小鼠腭突正常发育与腭裂形成中差异cDNA文库的建立.口腔医学研究,2003,19(6):476-479
    61.轩昆,金岩,文玲英.牙根发育不全疾病致病差异表达基因文库的建立.临床口腔医学杂志.2003,19(10):587-590
    62.池晓菲 舒庆尧.开放的差异基因表达技术研究进展.中国生物化学与分子生物学报.2002,18(3):259-264
    63. Wodicka L, Dong H, Mittrnann M, Ho MH.Genome-wide expression monitoring in
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.