济阳坳陷石炭—二叠系沉积及成岩演化
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
近年来的勘探实践表明,济阳坳陷石炭-二叠系具有良好的油气勘探前景。在前人勘探与研究成果的基础上,综合利用地质、地球物理和地球化学等资料,并结合华北板块南北两侧造山带构造演化,对济阳坳陷石炭-二叠系地层展布、沉积作用、成岩演化、储层特征及其控制因素进行了系统研究。
     研究结果表明,济阳坳陷石炭-二叠系发育陆表海滨岸环境、海陆过渡环境和陆相环境等3类沉积环境;台地-泻湖沉积体系、障壁岛-泻湖-潮坪复合沉积体系、三角洲沉积体系以及河流-湖泊复合沉积体系等4种沉积体系;泻湖相、台地相、潮坪相、障壁岛相、浅水三角洲相、曲流河相和浅水湖泊相等7种沉积相类型,发生了5~6次海侵作用(沿海侵通道,海水从南向北发展,自东向西迁移),存在陆表海滨岸聚煤模式和浅水三角洲聚煤模式等2种主要成煤模式和三角洲平原泥炭沼泽、泻湖泥炭坪、岛后泥炭坪、潮坪泥炭坪和碳酸盐台地泥炭坪等5种主要成煤环境。从晚石炭世到晚二叠世,济阳坳陷发育了陆表海环境的含煤建造、海陆过渡环境的浅水三角洲相含煤建造以及陆相环境的河湖相碎屑岩建造,物源区始终为阴山造山带东部地区,碎屑物质供应能力逐渐增强。伴随着海水逐渐退去和气候变的干燥,聚煤环境变差,氧化环境下的陆相沉积逐渐占据主导地位。周缘造山带和残留海盆的构造演化是控制该区石炭二叠纪沉积演化的主要因素。
     依据常规物性以及孔隙结构分析,二叠系山西组浅水三角洲砂体及下石盒子组和上石盒子组曲流河砂体为该区有效储集砂体类型,总体属于低孔低渗-特低孔特低渗型储层,储集空间类型以次生溶蚀孔隙为主。孔喉半径小、分选差、连通性差、渗流能力弱是砂体储层孔喉结构的基本特征。与山西组相比,下石盒子组和上石盒子组砂岩储层具有孔喉分布偏粗歪度、渗流能力有所增强、次生溶蚀孔隙更为发育、排驱压力大幅降低的特点。
     在综合分析沉积条件、成岩演化和构造作用对储层物性影响的基础上,认为控制储层的主要地质因素是沉积条件,即沉积主水道的分布特征(砂体几何形态)。最后利用孔隙度、渗透率及分维三个参数,建立了该区深层储层分类评价标准,并预测出车西、义东、罗家、孤北、王家岗、金家、高青及判参镇地区为有利勘探区,邵家和惠民凹陷南坡为较有利勘探区。
Experience of exploration in recent years reveals that Permo-Carboniferous formation in Jiyang depression has good oil and gas exploring promising. Base on the data of geology, geophysics, geochemistry and the tectonic evolution history of north and south border orogenic zones of North China plate, stratigraphic distribution, sedimentation, diagenetic evolution, characteristics and controlling factors of reservoir of Permo-Carboniferous in Jiyang depression have been studied.
     The result show that three sedimentary environments that are epicontinental littoral environment, continental-marine environment and continental environment; four sedimentary systems that are lagoon-plateau sedimentary system, barrier land-tidal flat-lagoon sedimentary system, shallow delta sedimentary system and fluvial-lake sedimentary system; seven sedimentary facies that are lagoon, plateau, barrier land, tidal flat, shallow delta, meandering river and shallow lake occurred in Permo-Carboniferous of Jiyang depression. And five to six times marine transgressions occurred in late Carboniferous period (along the transgression passageway from south to north, then, from east to west), and two accumulating coal models that are epicontinental littoral environment and shallow delta environment, five accumulating coal environments that are delta plain peat swamp, lagoon peat flat, barrier land peat flat, tidal peat flat and carbonate plateau peat flat existed. From late Carboniferous to late Permian, Jiyang depression developed epicontinental littoral environment coal-bearing sedimentary successions, continental-marine environment shallow delta facies coal-bearing sedimentary successions and continental environments fluvial and lake facies poor coal -bearing sedimentary successions, and the provenance always lay in the east area of the Yinshan orogenic zone, the ability of providing sediments gradually strengthened. Accompanying with seawater’s fallback and climate becoming to dry, the coal-forming environment becoming poor, continental sediment of oxidizing environment gradually played a main role in sedimentary successions. The tectonic evolution history of boundary orogenic zones and remnant sea basins are the main controlling factors to all the sedimentary process.
     Based on the analysis of routine physical properties and pore throat structure in sandstone reservoirs in Permian of Jiyang depression, shallow delta facies sand body of Shanxi Formation and meandering river facies sand body of Shang, Xiashihezi Formation are the main efficient reservoir in this area, and the reservoir sand bodies belong to low porosity and permeability to extremely low porosity and permeability, and the main reservoir space is the secondary dissolution pores. The reservoir pore throat structure characterized by mini pore throat, poor sorting, poor connectedness and poor infiltrating ability. Comparing to Shanxi Formation, Shang, Xiashihezi Formation reservoirs have the features of skewing bold pore throat size distribution, more secondary dissolution pores, improving infiltrating ability and lower displacement pressure.
     On the basis of reservoir physical properties affected by sedimentary condition, diagenetic evolution and tectonic process, it can be concluded that the main geological factor to control reservoir properties is sedimentary condition, i.e. the characteristics of distributions of sedimentary main fluvial channels (geometric shape of sand body). And finally, the classification criteria of the deeply buried reservoirs are established making use of the three factors-porosity, permeability and fractal dimension. Based on above analysis, it can be forecasted that the most favorable exploration targets are the west of Chenzhen, the east of Yihezhuang, Luojia, Gubei, Wangjiagang, Jinjia, Gaoqin and Pancanzhen areas and the more favorable exploration targets are Shaojia and the south of Huimin sag areas.
引文
[1] 梁生正,杨国奇,田建章等.渤海湾叠合盆地大中型天然气田的勘探方向.石油学报, 2001, 22 (6) :1-4
    [2] 王兆云,何海清,程克明.华北区古生界原生油气藏勘探前景.石油学报,1999,20 (2) :1-6
    [3] 梁生正,谢恭俭,马郡,等. 华北石炭—二叠系残留盆地天然气勘探方向. 天然气工业, 1998, 18 (6) : 16-19
    [4] 王毓俊,田在艺.华北东部盆地油气勘探潜力与发展方向.石油学报, 2003, 24 (7) : 7-12
    [5] 张亚光,杨子玉,肖枚等.乌马营潜山天然气藏地质地球化学特征和成藏过程.天然气地球科学, 2003, 14 (4) :283-286
    [6] 胡宗全,周新科,张玉兰.济阳坳陷前第三系油气勘探前景,石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(5): 655 - 660
    [7] 冯增昭,王英华,刘焕杰等.中国沉积学.北京:石油工业出版社,1994, 123-143
    [8] M.Molina,P.A. Ruiz-Ortiz, J.A. Vera.Calcareous tempestites in pelagic facies. Sedimentary Geology, 1997(109): 95-109
    [9] 刘宝君等.中国扬子地台西缘寒武纪风暴事件与磷矿沉积.沉积学报, 1987, 5(3): 87-95
    [10] 张金亮等.东濮凹陷沙三段的风暴沉积.沉积学报,1988,6(1):50-54
    [11] 杜远生,韩欣.滇中中元古代昆阳群因民组碎屑风暴岩及其意义.沉积学报, 2000, 6(2): 259-262
    [12] 张国栋.现代滨岸风暴沉积-以舟山普陀岛、朱家尖岛为例.沉积学报,1987, 5(2): 43-48
    [13] 谢钦春,马黎明,李伯根等.浙江三门湾猫头深潭风暴快速沉积研究.海洋学报, 2001, 23 (5): 78-86
    [14] 李育慈,晋慧娟, 新疆博格达山晚古生代风暴岩及其古地理意义,沉积学报, 1993, 11 (1) : 23-31
    [15] Mutii E.,Ricci F., Segurentm., Zanzucchi G.Seismotturbidite: a new group of resedimented deposits. Marine Geology, 1984, 55 (1/2): 103-116
    [16] Seilacher A. Sedimentary structures tentatively attributed to seismic events. Marine Geology, 1984, 55: 1-12
    [17] Heezen B C, Ewing M. Turbidity currents and submarineslumps and 1929 Grand bank earthquake. Am JSci,1952, 250 (12): 849-873
    [18] Heezen B C, Dyke C L. Grand bank Slump .Bull Am AssPetrol Geol, 1964, 48(2): 221-225
    [19] T.Shiki, M. B.Cita and D. S.Gorsline. Sedimentary features of seismite, seismo-turbidites and tsunamiites-an introduction. Sedimentary Geology, 2000,135(1-4): 7-9
    [20] Vanneste K., M.Meghraoui and T.Camelbeeck. Late Quaternary earthquake-related soft-sediment deformation along the Belgian portion of the Feldbiss Fault, Lower Rhine Graben system. Tectonophysics,1999,309(1-4):57-79
    [21] Jean Claude Plaziat and Mfedal Ahmamou. Mechanic processes active in seismites; their identification and tectonic significance in the Pliocene basin of the Sais of Fes and Meknes (Morocco). Geodinamic Acta.1998, 11(4): 183-203
    [22] Bhattacharya H. N. and Sandip Bandyopadhyay. Seismites in a Proterozoic tidal succession, Singhbhum, Bihar India,Sedimentary Geology .1998,119(3-4): 239-252
    [23] Rakesh Mohindra and T.N. Bagati. Seismically induced soft-sediment deformation structures (seismites) around Sumdo in the Lower Spitti valley(Tethys Himalaya). Sedmentary Geology, 1996,101(1-2):69-83
    [24] Rodriguez-Pascua M. A., J.P Calvo,G. De Vicente et al., Soft sediment deformation structures interpreted as seismites in lacustrine sediments of the Prebetic Zone, SE Spain,and their potential use as indicators of earthquake magnitudes during the Late Miocene. Sedimentary Geology. 2000, 135 (1-4):117-135
    [25] 宋天锐.北京十三陵前寒武纪碳酸盐岩地层中的一套可能的地震-海啸序列.科学通报, 1988, 38(8): 609-611
    [26] 乔秀夫.中国震积岩的研究与展望.地质论评,1996,42(4):317-320
    [27] 乔秀夫.宋天锐,高林志等.碳酸盐岩振动液化地震序列.地质学报, 1994, 68 (1): 16-32
    [28] 乔秀夫,李海兵,高林志.华北地台震旦纪-早古生代地震节律.1997,地学前缘, 4(3-4): 155-160
    [29] 郭建华,王方平,刘贵等.湘西大庸上震旦统灯影组震裂角砾岩.石油实验地质, 1999,21(3):219-224
    [30] 吴贤涛,尹国勋.四川峨眉晚侏罗世湖泊沉积中震积岩的发现及其意义.沉积学报, 1992, 10 (3): 19-24
    [31] 陈世悦, 袁文芳, 鄢继华.济阳坳陷早第三纪震积岩的发现及其意义.地质科学, 2003, 38 (3) : 377-384
    [32] 纪友亮,张世奇.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式.北京:地质出版社,1998
    [33] 朱筱敏.层序地层学. 山东东营: 石油大学出版社, 2000, 1- 9
    [34] 纪友亮,张世奇.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学.北京:石油工业出版社,1996, 1-15
    [35] C.K.威尔格斯等.徐怀大等译.层序地层学原理.北京:石油工业出版社,1993, 1-45
    [36] 刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏等.陆相层序地层学导论与应用.北京:石油工业出版社, 2002, 5-28
    [37] 陈文学,姜在兴,鲜本忠等.层序地层学与隐蔽圈闭预测―以河南泌阳凹陷为例.北京:石油工业出版社, 2001, 3-21
    [38] 张万选,张厚福.陆相地震地层学.北京:石油工业出版社,1994, 7-19
    [39] 赵澄林,季汉成.现代沉积.北京:石油工业出版社,1997, 1-16
    [40] 李从先,韩昌甫.低能海岸的垂直层序和风暴沉积.沉积学报,1992,10(4):119-128
    [41] 陆克政.含油气盆地分析.东营:石油大学出版社,2001, 43-51
    [42] 覃建雄,徐国盛,曾允孚.现代沉积学理论重大进展综述,地质科技情报, 1995,14(3):23-32
    [43] 赵澄林,储层沉积学, 北京:石油工业出版社,1998, 1-24
    [44] 罗明高,黄键全.油气聚集微观定量模型, 沉积学报,2000,18 (1): 151-156
    [45] 李四光.中国北部之蜓科,中国古生物志(乙种), 1927,4(1), 24-59
    [46] 刘鸿允等.太原西山古生代含煤地层研究,科学通报, 1957, 11, 13-16
    [47] 刘鸿允,刘宪亭.山西的陆相三叠系石千峰组和二马营群,中国地质科学院院报, 1984, 9(2): 137-156
    [48] 杜宽平.对太原西山月门沟煤系的新见,地质论评, 1958,18(2), 16-20
    [49] 杜宽平,沈玉蔚.太原西山上古生代地层的划分,地质科学, 1959,7(1): 21-26
    [50] 盛金章.中国的二叠系.北京:科学出版社,1962
    [51] 盛金章.中国的蜓类, 北京:科学出版社,1962
    [52] 李星学.华北月门沟群植物化石.中国古生物志,1963
    [53] 李星学.中国晚古生代陆相地层.全国地层委员会编,中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所集刊, 1987, 6: 1-118
    [54] 李星学,姚兆奇,蔡重阳等.甘肃靖远石炭系生物地层, 全国地层委员会编,中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所集刊,1987, 8: 24-197
    [55] 李星学等.中国地质时期植物群(中文版). 南宁: 广西科技出版社, 1995
    [56] 尚楚雄.华北地台晚古生代煤地质学研究.太原:陕西科学技术出版社,1997
    [57] 汪增萌等.辽东福州晚中石炭世地层简论华北地台中石炭统的划分.现代地质, 1989, 3(2): 107-113
    [58] 汪增萌, 尚楚雄.阴山南麓的两个陆相石炭系剖面,煤炭学报, 1986, 3(2): 37-46
    [59] 米家榕,孙克勤,金建华.辽宁本溪早石炭世植物化石,长春地质学院院报, 1990,20(4): 361-368
    [60] 高联达,范国清.辽东早石炭世晚期孢子花粉的发现及其地层意义.中国区域地质, 1995, 3: 268-271
    [61] 金建华,王嘹亮等.中国早石炭世晚期植物地理分区问题初见,长春地质学院学报, 1992, 22 (4): 361-365
    [62] 刘发.辽宁本溪本溪组下部腕足类化石的发现及其意义,长春地质学院学报, 1987, 17 (2): 254-256
    [63] 范国清.中朝板块东部石炭纪沉积特征及其构造、古地理, 岩相古地理, 1990, 3: 56-59
    [64] 刘焕杰.潮坪成煤环境初论-三汇坝晚二叠世龙潭组含煤建造沉积环境模式.中国矿业大学学报,1982, 2: 34-41
    [65] 刘焕杰等.华北石炭纪含煤建造的陆表海堡岛体系特点及其事件沉积.沉积学报, 1987, 5(3): 51-55
    [66] 刘焕杰等.准格尔煤田含煤建造岩相古地理学研究.地质出版社,1991
    [67] 刘焕杰,桑树勋等.成煤环境的比较沉积学研究.徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,1996, 23-68
    [68] 陈世悦,徐凤银,刘焕杰.华北晚古生代层序地层与聚煤规律.东营:石油大学出版社,2000, 18-36, 99-112, 132-145
    [69] 王兆云,赵文智,王云鹏.中国海相碳酸盐岩气源岩评价指标研究,自然科学进展, 2004, 14(11): 1236-1243
    [70] 曹忠祥,刘华,王玉林.济阳坳陷石炭-二叠系沉积与层序地层分析, 山东科技大学学报, 2002, 21(2): 68-72
    [71] 王玉林.济阳石炭-二叠纪沉积与层序地层分析, 河南石油, 2003, 17(5): 1-3
    [72] 刘华.微量元素分析在含煤地层层序划分中的应用.山东科技大学学报, 2004, 23 (1): 12-16
    [73] 李明娟,张洪年,胡宗全等.济阳坳陷石炭-二叠纪层序地层研究, 石油与天然气地质, 2004, 25(1): 100-106
    [74] 李明娟,郑和荣,张海清.济阳坳陷晚古生代岩相古地理, 石油地质与工程, 2006, 20(5): 6-9
    [75] 李明娟, 张洪年,胡宗全等.济阳坳陷石炭-二叠纪层序划分与等时格架建立地层研究, 石油物探, 2004, 45(1): 83-87
    [76] 于林平,曹忠祥,李增学.济阳坳陷石炭-二叠系烃源岩有机地球化学特征, 地质地球化学, 2003, 31(4): 68-73
    [77] 白群丽.济阳坳陷石炭-二叠系煤成气成藏模式分析, 油气地质与采收率, 2003, 10(5): 28-30
    [78] 周建林.济阳坳陷石炭-二叠纪煤成气成藏规律认识, 地球科学与环境学报, 2004,26 (2): 47-50
    [79] 彭传圣.济阳坳陷孤北低潜山煤成气成藏条件及特征,中国海洋大学学报, 2005, 35(4): 670-676
    [80] 王秉海,钱凯.胜利油区地质研究与勘探实践,山东东营:石油大学出版社, 1992
    [81] 牛树银,陈路,许传诗等.太行山区地壳演化及成矿规律.北京:地震出版社, 1994
    [82] 段太忠,曾允孚,高振中.根据沉积历史分析华南古大陆边缘的构造演化.石油与天然气地质,1988, 9(4) : 410-420
    [83] 王颖,赵锡奎,高博禹.济阳坳陷构造演化特征, 成都理工学院学报, 2002, 29 (2): 181- 187
    [84] 侯贵廷,钱祥麟,宋新民. 渤海湾盆地的形成机制.北京大学学报(自然科学版), 1998, 34 (4) : 503-509
    [85] 王尚文.中国石油地质学. 北京:石油工业出版社,1983. 348
    [86] 宗国洪,施央申,王秉海等.济阳盆地中生代构造特征与油气.地质论评, 1998, 44(3): 289 - 294
    [87] 侯贵廷,钱祥麟,蔡东升.渤海湾盆地中、新生代构造演化研究, 北京大学学报, 2001,37(6): 845-851
    [88] 宗国洪,肖焕钦,李常宝等.济阳坳陷构造演化及其大地构造意义,高校地质学报, 1999, 5(3): 275-282
    [89] 徐嘉炜. 郯庐断裂带的平移运动及地质意义. 国际交流地质学术论文集 1, 1980, 129 - 142
    [90] O. Serra 等.测井资料地质解释, 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1992
    [91] 王中刚,于学元,赵振华等.稀土元素地球化学.北京:科学出版社,1989
    [92] Wright J, Holser W T. Geological Society of America Abstracts With Progress, 1981, 13: 586
    [93] Wright J, Seymour R S, Shaw H F. REE and Nd isotopes in conodont apatite: variations with geological age and depositional environment. Geological Society of Ametica, Special paper, 1984,196: 325-340
    [94] Wright J, Miller J F, Holser W T. Conodont chemostratigraphy across the Cambrian-Ordovician boundary: Western United State and Southeast China. In Austin R L ed. Conodonts: Investigative Techniques and Applications, Ellis Horwood Ltd, 1986, 259-280
    [95] Wright J, Schrader H, Solser W T, Paleoredox variations in ancient oceans records by rare earth elements in fossil apatite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1987, 51: 631-644
    [96] Elderfield H, Pagett R. REE in ichtholiths: variations with redox conditions and depositional environment. Science of the total environment, 1986,49: 175-197
    [97] Wang Y L, Liu Y G, Schmitt R A, Race earth element geochemistry of South Atlantic deep sea sediments: Ce anomaly change. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1986, 50: 1337-1355
    [98] Liu Y G, Miah M R U, Schmitt R A, Cerium: a chemical tracer for paleo-oceanic redox condition, Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1988, 52: 1361-1371
    [99] Hu X, Wang Y L, Schmitt R A, Geochemistry of sediments on the Rio Grande Rise and the redox evolution of the South Atlantic Ocean. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1988, 52: 201-207
    [100] Veizer J, Demovic R. Evironmental and climatatic controlled fractionation of elements in Mesozoic carbonate sequences of the western Carpathims. Jour. Sed. Petrology, 1973, 43 (1): 258-271
    [101] Veizer J, Demovic R. Strontium as a tool in facies analysis, Jour. Sed. Petrology, 1974, 44 (1): 93-115
    [102] 刘本立.地球化学基础.北京:北京大学出版社,1994,186-187
    [103] 陈洪德,刘文均,郑荣才.层序地层学理论和研究方法,成都:四川科学技术出版社, 1994, 138-139
    [104] 王随继,黄杏珍,妥进才等.泌阳凹陷核桃园组微量元素演化特征及其古气候意义, 沉积学报, 1997, 15 (1): 65-70
    [105] Yang S Y, Li C X, Jung H S, et al. Discrimination of geochemical compositions between the Chang jiang and the Huanghe sediments and its application for the identification of sediment source in the Jiangsu coastal plain, China. Marine Geology, 2002, 186: 229-241
    [106] 何宏,彭苏萍,邵龙义.巴楚寒武-奥陶系碳酸盐岩微量元素及沉积环境, 新疆石油地质, 2004, 25 (6): 631-633
    [107] 韩宗珠,袁红明,庄振业等.山东莱州仓上泻湖Y86孔微量元素地球化学特征及沉积相判别, 海洋湖沼通报, 2005, 2: 13-21
    [108] 彭海艳,陈洪德,向芳等.微量元素分析在沉积环境识别中的应用—以鄂尔多斯盆地东部二叠系山西组为例, 新疆地质, 2006, 24 (2): 202-205
    [109] 熊应乾,刘振夏, 杜德文等.东海陆架 EA01 孔沉积物常微量元素变化及其意义, 沉积学报, 2006, 24 (3): 56-60
    [110] 牟保磊.元素地球化学, 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1999, 23-89
    [111] 严佳新,徐四平,李方林.湖北巴东栖霞组缺氧沉积环境的地球化学特征, 岩相古地理, 1998, 18 (6): 27-32
    [112] Donaldson A C. Pennsylvanian sedimentation of central appalachians. The Geol. Soc. of America. Special paper 148.1974,47-48
    [113] Coleman J M, Prior D B. Deltaic environment of deposition. In: Scholle P A Spraring D.eds. Sand -stone Geol. 1982, 137-138
    [114] 刘焕杰.潮坪成煤环境初论-三汇坝晚二叠世龙潭组含煤建造沉积环境模式. 中国矿业学院学报, 1982, (2) : 61-71
    [115] 葛宝勋,尹国勋,李春生.山西阳泉矿区含煤岩系沉积环境及聚煤规律探讨.沉积学报, 1985, 3 (3) : 33-44
    [116] 刘焕杰,贾玉如,王宏伟.华北石炭纪含煤建造的陆表海堡岛体系特点及其事件沉积.沉积学报, 1987, 5 (3) : 73-80
    [117] 杨起.河南禹县晚古生代煤系沉积环境与聚煤特征. 北京: 地质出版社. 1987, 55-71
    [118] 李宝芳,李祯,付泽明.华北南部晚古生代陆表海的沉积充填特征和构造演化. 地球科学, 1989, 14 (4) : 367-378
    [119] 王士俊.山西、山东太原组煤核中的科达植物及其生活环境.中国矿业大学学报, 1989, (4) : 71-80
    [120] 程保洲.山西晚古生代沉积环境与聚煤规律.太原:山西科技出版社,1992, 121-243
    [121] 陈钟惠,武法东,张守良等.华北晚古生代含煤岩系沉积环境和聚煤规律.武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1993, 54-76
    [122] 李增学,魏久传,李守春.鲁西河控浅水三角洲沉积体系及聚煤规律.煤田地质与勘探, 1995, 23 (2): 7-13
    [123] 尚冠雄.华北地台晚古生代煤地质学研究.太原:山西科技出版社, 1997, 55-67
    [124] 陈建文.东海某井两类河流相沉积,海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1991, 11 (1): 41-45
    [125] Miall A D, The geology of fluvial deposits, Sptinges-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1996, 75-178
    [126] 辛仁臣, 柳成志, 雷顺.粗粒曲流河体系河道沉积的沉积构型分析-以籍家岭泉头组露头为例, 大庆石油学院学报, 1997, 21 (3): 16-19
    [127] 刘发.辽宁本溪本溪组下部腕足类化石的发现及意义. 长春地质学院学报, 1987, 17 (2): 35-37
    [128] 米家榕,孙克琴,金建华.辽宁本溪早石炭世植物化石,长春地质学院学报, 1990, 20 (4): 361-368
    [129] 米家榕, 金建华, 孙克琴.辽东早石炭世地层的发现. 中国地质学会编“,七五”地质科技重要成果学术交流会议论文选集, 北京:科学技术出版社, 1992, 9-13
    [130] 范国清.关于华北早、中石炭世的海侵方向,科学通报, 1991, 36(6): 454-455
    [131] 高联达,范国清.辽东早石炭世晚期孢子花粉的发现及其地层意义,中国区域地质, 1995, (3): 268-271
    [132] 范国清.中朝板块东部石炭纪沉积特征及其构造、古地理, 岩相古地理,1990, 3: 1-8
    [133] 范国清.华北石炭纪海侵活动规律.中国区域地质,1991, 4: 349-355
    [134] 裴放.北秦岭晚古生代海槽与华北陆块石炭—二叠纪含煤岩系,中国区域地质, 1998, 17 (4): 385 -389
    [135] 武法东, 陈钟惠, 张守良等.华北晚古生代含煤盆地层序地层初探.中国煤田地质, 1994, 6 (1): 11-18
    [136] 武法东,陈钟惠,张守良等.华北石炭-二叠纪的海侵作用.现代地质, 1995, 9(3): 284-292
    [137] 陈世悦.论秦岭碰撞造山作用对华北石炭-二叠纪海侵过程的控制,岩相古地理, 1998, 18 (2): 48-54
    [138] Wan Tianfeng, Length and penetration depth of the Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone in Eastern Asia. In: Wan Tianfeng, Zhuhong, Zhao Lei et al (eds.). Formation evolution of Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press,1996, 12-25
    [139] Xu Jiawei (ed.). The Tancheng-Lujiang wrench fault system. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 1993, 300
    [140] 陈丕基. 郯庐断裂巨大平移的时代与格局,科学通报, 1988, 33 (4): 289-293
    [141] 张用夏,李卢玲.郯庐断裂带的平移及其对邻区构造的影响,构造地质论丛(3), 北京:地质出版社,1984,1-8
    [142] 翁世劼.关于郯庐断裂带的几个地质问题,构造地质论丛(3), 北京: 地质出版社, 1984,66-71
    [143] 郭振一.沂沭断裂带的基本特征及其活动方式,构造地质论丛(3), 北京: 地质出版社, 1984, 142-151
    [144] 张理刚,王可法.中国东部中(新)生代构造同位素地质学研究,桂林冶金地质学院学报, 1991, 11 (1):35-48
    [145] Wan Tianfeng, Length and penetration depth of the Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone in Eastern Asia. In: Wan Tianfeng, Zhuhong, Zhao Lei et al (eds.). Formation evolution of Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press, 1996, 93
    [146] Wan Tianfeng, Zhuhong. Tectonic events of late Proterozoic-Triassic in South China. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences,1991,6(2):147-157
    [147] Wan Tianfeng, Intraplate deformation, tectonic stress field and their application for eastern China University of Geosciences Press, 1994, 76-89
    [148] 周伏洪,姚正熙,张文俊等.郯庐断裂带航磁特征及其深部构造,构造地质论丛(3), 北京: 地质出版社,1984,272-285
    [149] Wan Tianfeng, Length and penetration depth of the Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone in Eastern Asia. In: Wan Tianfeng, Zhuhong, Zhao Lei et al (eds.). Formation evolution of Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press, 1996, 12-25
    [150] 万年丰,朱鸿,赵磊等.郯庐断裂带的形成与演化:综述, 现代地质,1996,10 (2): 159-168
    [151] 任纪舜.中国东部及邻区大地构造演化的新见解,中国区域地质,1989, 4: 289-390
    [152] 张鹏飞,邵龙义,代世峰.华北地台晚古生代海侵模式雏议,古地理学报, 2001, 3 (1): 15-24
    [153] 葛宝勋, 尹国勋, 李春生.山西阳泉矿区含煤岩系沉积环境及聚煤规律探讨. 沉积学报, 1985, 3 (3) : 33-44
    [154] 杨起.河南禹县晚古生代煤系沉积环境与聚煤特征. 北京: 地质出版社, 1987, 96-186
    [155] 刘焕杰,贾玉如,王宏伟.华北石炭纪含煤建造的陆表海堡岛体系特点及其事件沉积.沉积学报, 1987, 5 (3) : 73-80
    [156] 李宝芳,李祯,付泽明.华北南部晚古生代陆表海的沉积充填特征和构造演化. 地球科学, 1989. 14 (4): 367-378
    [157] 程保洲.山西晚古生代沉积环境与聚煤规律. 太原: 山西科技出版社. 1992, 64-190
    [158] 陈钟惠,武法东,张守良等.华北晚古生代含煤岩系沉积环境和聚煤规律. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社. 1993, 1-153
    [159] 尚冠雄.华北地台晚古生代煤地质学研究. 太原: 山西科技出版社. 1997, 13-26, 91-280
    [160] 桑树勋, 陈世悦,刘焕杰,华北晚古生代成煤环境与成煤模式多样性研究, 2001, 36(2): 212 - 221
    [161] MaCabe P J. Depositional environments of coal and coal-bearing sequences. In: Rahmani R A and Flores R M. eds. Sedimentology of coal and coal-bearing sequences. Special Publication of International Association of Sedimentologist, 1984, 7:13-42
    [162] Cameron C C, Esterle J S and Palmer C A. The geology, botany and chemistry of selected peat-forming environments from temperate and tropical latitudes. International Journal of Coal Geology, 1989, 12 (1-4) : 105-156
    [163] Moore T A and Hilbert R E. Petrographic and anatomical characteristics of plant material from two peat-forming environments of Holocene and Miocene age, Kalimantan, Indonesia. Research of Palaeobotanic Palynology, 1992, 72(1): 199-227
    [164] 刘焕杰, 桑树勋等.成煤环境的比较沉积学研究.徐州:中国矿业大学出版社, 1996, 55-78
    [165] 许效松, 徐强, 潘桂棠等.中国南大陆古地理与 Pangea 对比, 岩相古地理, 1996, 16 (2): 1-23
    [166] Royden, L, H., The tectonic expression of slab pull at continental convergent boundaries, Tectonics, 1993, 12: 303-325
    [167] Shackleton, R, M., Precambrian collision tectonics in Africa, In: M. P. Coward and A. C. Pies (eds), Collision Tectonics. Spec. Publ. Geol. Soc., London, 1986, 19: 359-349
    [168] Zhang Guowei et al. Orogenisis and dynamics of the Qinling orogeny, Science in China (D), 1996, 3: 225-234
    [169] 张国伟,张宗清,董云朋. 秦岭造山带主要构造岩石地层单元的构造性质及其大地构造意义. 岩石学报, 1995, 11(2): 101-114
    [170] 唐克东等.中朝板块北侧褶皱带构造演化及成矿规律, 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1992
    [171] 陈世悦.华北地块南部晚古生代-三叠纪盆地演化与盆山耦合关系研究:[博士后研究工作报告], 西北大学, 陕西西安, 1997, 112-170
    [172] 赵红格, 刘池洋. 物源分析方法及研究进展,沉积学报, 2003,21 (3): 409 - 415
    [173] 冯增昭.沉积岩石学.北京:石油工业出版社,1993,1-162
    [174] Dicknson W R. Sucaek C A. Plate tectonics and sandstone composition. AAPG, 1979, 63: 2164 -2182
    [175] Dicknson W R. Provenance of North American Phanerozoic Sandstones in relation to tectonic setting. Bull Geol Am, 1983, 94: 222-235
    [176] Cullers R L , Barrett T , Carlson R , et al . REE and mineralogic changes in Holocene soil and stream sediment. Chem. Geol, 1987, 63 :275-297
    [177] Cullers R L , Basu A , Suttner L J . Geochemical signature of provenance in sand-size mineral in soil and stream near the tabacco root batholith, Montana, USA. Chem Geol, 1988, 70:335-348
    [178] McLennan S M, Taylor S R. Sedimentary rocks and crustal evolution: tectonic setting and secular trands. The J Geol, 1991, 99: 1-21
    [179] McLennan S M. Rare earth elements in sedimentary rocks: influence of provenance and sedimentary processes. In: Lipin B R, McKay GA, eds. Geochemistry and mineralogy of rare earth elements. Reviews in Mineralogy, 1989, 21: 169-200
    [180] Taylor S R, McLennan SM. The continental crust: Its composition and evolution. Blackwell, 1985, 312
    [181] Girty G H. Provenance and depositional setting of Paleozoic chert and argillite, Sierra Nervada, California. J Sedi Res, 1996, 66 (1) :107-118
    [182] Grigsby J D. Detrital magnetite as a provenance indicator. J Sedi Petrol, 1990, 60 (6): 940-951
    [183] Morton A C. Geochemical studies of detrital heavy minerals and their application to provenance research. In: Morton A C , eds. Development in sedimentary provenance studies, 1991, 31-45
    [184] Murray R W, Brink M R, Brumsack H J, et al. REE in Japan Sea sediments and diagenetic behavior of Ce/Ce: Results from ODP Log 127. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1991, 55: 2453 -2466
    [185] Murray R W. Chemical criteria to identify the depositional environment of chert: general principles and applications. Sedi Geol, 1994, 90: 213-232
    [186] 杨守业,李从先.REE 示踪沉积物物源研究进展, 地球科学进展, 1999, 14(2): 164-167
    [187] 刘英俊,曹励明.元素地球化学导论.北京:地质出版社,1987.57-80
    [188] 高爱国,陈志华,刘焱光等.楚科奇海表层沉积物的稀土元素地球化学特征.中国科学(D 辑), 2003,33 (2): 148-153
    [189] 刘锐娥,黄月明, 卫孝锋等.鄂尔多斯盆地北部晚古生代物源区分析及其地质意义, 矿物岩石, 2003, 23(3): 82-86
    [190] 刘锐娥,卫孝峰,王亚丽等. 泥质岩稀土元素地球化学特征在物源分析中的意义-以鄂尔多斯盆地石炭-二叠纪为例, 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16 (6): 788 - 791
    [191] 席胜利,王怀厂,秦伯平.鄂尔多斯盆地北部山西组、下石盒子组物源分析.天然气工业, 2002, 22 (2) :21-24
    [192] Haughton D W, Morton A C, Todd S P. Developments in sedimentary provenance studies. London: Oxford University Press, 1991, 45-57
    [193] 陈纯芳,郑浚茂,王德发.板桥凹陷沙三段沉积体系与物源分析.古地理学报, 2001, 3 (1) : 55-62
    [194] 刘宝君,曾允孚.岩相古地理基础和工作方法,北京:地质工业出版社,1985, 45-71
    [195] 朱国华.碎屑岩储集层孔隙的形成,演化和预测.沉积学报,1992,10 (3):258-265
    [196] 耿斌,才巨宏.一种考虑成岩作用的砂岩孔隙度解释方法.石油学报, 2004, 25 (5): 44-47
    [197] 郭军,单玄龙,万传彪等.松辽盆地白垩系砂岩储集层特征.世界地质, 2002, 21 (3): 242-245
    [198] 王宝清.三肇扶余及杨大城子油层储集层的成岩作用.石油与天然气地质, 2001, 22 (1): 82-86
    [199] 吴朝东.延安延安组沉积岩类型及储集性能.岩石学报.1996,12(4): 606-618
    [200] 陈杰, 周改英, 赵喜亮等.储层岩石孔隙结构特征研究方法综述, 特种油气藏, 2005, 12(4): 11-14
    [201] 罗蛰谭, 王允诚.油气储集层的孔隙结构.科学出版社,1986, 21-43, 106-123
    [202] Wardlaw, N.C, Tayler, R.P., Mercury capillary pressure curves and the interpretation of pore structure and fluid distribution. Bull. Can. Petrol. Geol., 1976, 24 (2): 225-226
    [203] 张绍槐,罗平亚.保护储集层技术, 北京:石油工业出版社,1993
    [204] 刘建清,赖兴运,于炳松等.成岩作用的研究现状及展望,石油实验地质, 2006, 28 (1): 65-77
    [205] 吴智平,李伟,任拥军等.济阳坳陷中生代盆地演化及其与新生代盆地叠合关系探讨,地质学报,2003,77(2):280-286
    [206] 应凤祥,罗平,何东博等.中国含油气盆地碎屑岩储集层成岩作用与成岩数值模拟,北京:石油工业出版社,2004, 91-99
    [207] 王志欣,徐怀民,信荃麟等.冀东油田北堡东营组储层特征及其主控因素,石油大学学报, 1996, 20(3): 1-5
    [208] 蔡进功,谢忠怀,田芳.济阳坳陷深层砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化. 石油与天然气地质, 2002, 23 (1) : 83-86
    [209] 钟大康,朱筱敏,张枝焕等. 东营凹陷古近系砂岩储集层物性控制因素评价. 石油勘探与开发, 2003,30 (3) : 95-98
    [210] 钟大康,朱筱敏,周新源等.塔里木盆地中部泥盆系东河砂岩成岩作用与储集性能控制. 古地理学报, 2003, 5 (3): 378-390
    [211] 朱筱敏,米立军,钟大康等.济阳坳陷古近系成岩作用及其对储层质量的影响,古地理学报, 2006, 8(3): 295-305
    [212] Beard D C, Weyl P K. Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated. AAPG Bulletin, 1973, 57: 349-369
    [213] Bloch S. Empirical prediction of porosity and permeability in sandstones. AAPG Bulletin, 1991, 75 (7): 1145-1160
    [214] 陈祥, 孙凤华, 伏卫东等. 焉耆盆地八道湾组储层物性特征及发育控制因素研究, 江汉石油学院学报, 2002 , 24 (4): 19-22
    [215] 李会军, 吴泰然, 吴波等.中国优质碎屑岩深层储层控制因素综述, 地质科技情报, 2004, 23(4): 76-82
    [216] 孟元林,刘德来,贺如等.歧北凹陷沙二段超压背景下成岩场分析与储层孔隙度预测,沉积学报, 2005, 23(3): 389-396
    [217] 杨松岭, 杜建平, 马广明等.吐哈盆地丘东气田中侏罗统西山窑组上下气藏储层差异性分析, 古地理学报, 2007, 9 (1): 107-116
    [218] Mandelbrot B B. The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco: Freeman, 1982
    [219] Falconer K J. The geometry of fractal sets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985
    [220] Hardy H H, Beier R A. Fractals in reservoir engineering. London: World Scientific, 1994
    [221] 王域辉,廖淑华.分形与石油.北京:石油工业出版社,1994:33-142
    [222] 纪法华,张一伟.分形几何学在储层非均质性描述中的应用.石油大学学报, 1994, 18 (5): 161-168
    [223] 金强,曾怡.储集性砂岩粒度组成的分形结构.石油大学学报,1995,19(3):12-16
    [224] 贾芬淑,沈平平,李克文.砂岩孔隙结构的分形特征及应用研究.断块油气田, 1995, 1(2): 16-21
    [225] 陈程,孙义梅.砂岩孔隙结构分维及其应用.沉积学报,1996,14(4):108-113
    [226] 张立强,纪友亮,马文杰等.博格达山前带砂岩孔隙结构分形几何学特征与储层评价.石油大学学报,1998,22(5): 31-34
    [227] 贺承祖,华明琪.储层孔隙结构的分形几何描述.石油与天然气地质, 1998, 19(1): 15-23
    [228] 何琰,吴念胜.确定孔隙结构分形维数的新方法.石油实验地质,1999,21(4): 372-375
    [229] 胡宗全,童孝华,王允诚.川中大安寨段灰岩裂缝分形特征及孔隙结构模型.成都理工学院学报,1999,26(1):31-33
    [230] 贺伟,钟孚勋等.储层岩石孔隙的分形结构研究和应用.天然气工业,2000,20(2): 67-70
    [231] 李留仁,赵艳艳,李忠兴等.多孔介质微观孔隙结构分形特征及分形系数的意义,石油大学学报,2004,28(3):105-108
    [232] 李中锋,何顺利,杨文新.砂岩储层孔隙结构分形特征描述, 成都理工大学学报, 2006, 33 (2): 203-208
    [233] Pfeiper, Avni R D. Chemistry nonintegral dimensions between two and three. Chem Phys, 1983, 79(7): 3369-3558
    [234] Katr A J, Thompson A H. Fractal sandstone pores: implication for conductive and formation. Phys Revlett, 1985,54(3): 1325-1328
    [235] Krohn C.E Sandstone fractal and Euclidean pore volume distribution, Geophys Res,1988, 93 (B4): 3286-3296
    [236] Krohn C.E. Fractal measurements of sandstone,, shales and carbonates. Geophys Res, 1988, 93 (B4): 3297-3305
    [237] Angulo R F, Alvarado V and Gonzalez H. Fractal dimension from mercury intrusion capillary test, SPE 23695,1992
    [238] 曾伟,强平,黄继祥.川东嘉二段孔隙层下限及分类与评价,矿物岩石,1997,17 (2): 42-48
NGLC 2004-2010.National Geological Library of China All Rights Reserved.
Add:29 Xueyuan Rd,Haidian District,Beijing,PRC. Mail Add: 8324 mailbox 100083
For exchange or info please contact us via email.